Search

Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-74 years. County-level information on population measures of mammography use can inform targeted intervention to reduce geographic disparities in mammography use. County-level estimates for mammography use nationwide are rarely presented., Methods: We used data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; n = 130,289 women), linked it to the American Community Survey poverty data, and fitted multilevel logistic regression models with two outcomes: mammography within the past 2 years (up-to-date), and most recent mammography 5 or more years ago or never (rarely/never). We poststratified the data with U.S. Census population counts to run Monte Carlo simulations. We generated county-level estimates nationally and by urban-rural county classifications. County-level prevalence estimates were aggregated into state and national estimates. We validated internal consistency between our model-based state-specific estimates and urban-rural estimates with BRFSS direct estimates using Spearman correlation coefficients and mean absolute differences., Results: Correlation coefficients were 0.94 or larger. Mean absolute differences for the two outcomes ranged from 0.79 to 1.03. Although 78.45% (95% confidence interval, 77.95%-78.92%) of women nationally were up-to-date with mammography, more than half of the states had counties with >15% of women rarely/never using a mammogram, many in rural areas., Conclusions: We provided estimates for all U.S. counties and identified marked variations in mammography use. Many states and counties were far from the 2020 target (81.1%)., Impact: Our results suggest a need for planning and resource allocation on a local level to increase mammography uptake., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine screening for colorectal cancer for adults ages 50 to 75 years. We generated small-area estimates for being current with colorectal cancer screening to examine sociogeographic differences among states and counties. To our knowledge, nationwide county-level estimates for colorectal cancer screening are rarely presented. Methods: We used county data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; n = 251,360 adults), linked it to the American Community Survey poverty data, and fitted multilevel logistic regression models. We post-stratified the data with the U.S. Census population data to run Monte Carlo simulations. We generated county-level screening prevalence estimates nationally and by race/ethnicity, mapped the estimates, and aggregated them into state and national estimates. We evaluated internal consistency of our modeled state-specific estimates with BRFSS direct state estimates using Spearman correlation coefficients. Results: Correlation coefficients were ≥0.95, indicating high internal consistency. We observed substantial variations in current colorectal cancer screening estimates among the states and counties within states. State mean estimates ranged from 58.92% in Wyoming to 75.03% in Massachusetts. County mean estimates ranged from 40.11% in Alaska to 79.76% in Florida. Larger county variations were observed in various race/ethnicity groups. Conclusions: State estimates mask county variations. However, both state and county estimates indicate that the country is far behind the "80% by 2018" target. Impact: County-modeled estimates help identify variation in colorectal cancer screening prevalence in the United States and guide education and enhanced screening efforts in areas of need, including areas without BRFSS direct-estimates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(3); 245-53. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: In 2005, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released guidelines which outlined specific family history patterns associated with an increased risk for BRCA1/2 mutations, and recommended at-risk individuals be referred for genetic counseling and evaluation for BRCA testing. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of individuals with a USPSTF increased-risk family history pattern, the frequency with which specific patterns were met, and resulting healthcare actions among women from the Henry Ford Health System., Methods: As part of a study evaluating ovarian cancer risk perception and screening, 2,524 randomly selected participants completed a detailed interview (response rate 76%) from an initial eligible cohort of 16,720 women., Results: Approximately 6% of participants had a family history fulfilling one or more of the USPSTF patterns. Although 90% of these women had shared their family history with their provider, less than 20% had been referred for genetic counseling and only 8% had undergone genetic testing. Caucasian women with higher income and education levels were more likely to receive referrals. Among the 95 participants in the total study cohort who reported BRCA testing, 78% did not have a family history that met one of the USPSTF patterns., Conclusions: These results suggest a higher prevalence of women with an increased-risk family history than originally predicted by the USPSTF, and lack of provider recognition and referral for genetic services., Impact: Improvements in healthcare infrastructure and clinician education will be required to realize population level benefits from BRCA genetic counseling and testing.

Evidence suggests a role for reproductive and hormonal factors in the etiology of colorectal cancer. Investigation of adenomas, the presumed precursors of cancer, and reproductive characteristics may place such associations within a particular stage of carcinogenesis. We examined parity, age at first birth, age at menopause, and age at menarche as well as contraceptive and noncontraceptive hormone use in a case-control study of 347 women (115 cases with adenomas and 232 controls) conducted in North Carolina. Using unconditional logistic regression analysis, increasing age at menopause was found to be associated with a reduction in the risk of adenomas [odds ratio (OR), 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.68]. An increased risk for adenomas was found for women undergoing surgical menopause as compared with women undergoing natural menopause (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.05-4.21). Our results suggest a reduced risk of adenomas associated with noncontraceptive hormone use that was limited to a subgroup of women with natural menopause or bilateral oophorectomy (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97). No associations were seen between other reproductive characteristics and adenomas. These results suggest protective effects for both endogenous and exogenous female hormones that operate early in the process of carcinogenesis. Alternatively, lifestyle factors or other correlates of exogenous hormone use and delayed menopause could play a role in reduced adenoma risk.