Search

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the incidence, prognostic performance, and generalizability of the Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) organ dysfunction criteria using electronic health record (EHR) data. Additionally, we sought to compare the performance of the PODIUM criteria with the organ dysfunction criteria proposed by the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC). METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of critically ill children at 2 medical centers in the United States between 2010 and 2018. We assessed prevalence of organ dysfunction based on the PODIUM and IPSCC criteria for each 24-hour period from admission to 28 days. We studied the prognostic performance of the criteria to discriminate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 22 427 PICU admissions met inclusion criteria, and in-hospital mortality was 2.3%. The cumulative incidence of each PODIUM organ dysfunction ranged from 15% to 30%, with an in-hospital mortality of 6% to 10% for most organ systems. The number of concurrent PODIUM organ dysfunctions demonstrated good-to-excellent discrimination for inhospital mortality (area under the curve 0.87-0.93 for day 1 through 28) and compared favorably to the IPSCC criteria (area under the curve 0.84-0.92, P < .001 to P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: We present the first evaluation of the PODIUM organ dysfunction criteria in 2 EHR databases. The use of the PODIUM organ dysfunction criteria appears promising for epidemiologic and clinical research studies using EHR data. More studies are needed to evaluate the PODIUM criteria that are not routinely collected in structured format in EHR databases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Early recognition and treatment of pediatric sepsis remain mainstay approaches to improve outcomes. Although most children with sepsis are diagnosed in the emergency department, some are admitted with unrecognized sepsis or develop sepsis while hospitalized. Our objective was to develop and validate a prediction model of pediatric sepsis to improve recognition in the inpatient setting., Methods: Patients with sepsis were identified using intention-to-treat criteria. Encounters from 2012 to 2018 were used as a derivation to train a prediction model using variables from an existing model. A 2-tier threshold was determined using a precision-recall curve: an "Alert" tier with high positive predictive value to prompt bedside evaluation and an "Aware" tier with high sensitivity to increase situational awareness. The model was prospectively validated in the electronic health record in silent mode during 2019., Results: A total of 55 980 encounters and 793 (1.4%) episodes of sepsis were used for derivation and prospective validation. The final model consisted of 13 variables with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.95-0.97) in the validation set. The Aware tier had 100% sensitivity and the Alert tier had a positive predictive value of 14% (number needed to alert of 7) in the validation set., Conclusions: We derived and prospectively validated a 2-tiered prediction model of inpatient pediatric sepsis designed to have a high sensitivity Aware threshold to enable situational awareness and a low number needed to Alert threshold to minimize false alerts. Our model was embedded in our electronic health record and implemented as clinical decision support, which is presented in a companion article., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Background: Following development and validation of a sepsis prediction model described in a companion article, we aimed to use quality improvement and safety methodology to guide the design and deployment of clinical decision support (CDS) tools and clinician workflows to improve pediatric sepsis recognition in the inpatient setting., Methods: CDS tools and sepsis huddle workflows were created to implement an electronic health record-based sepsis prediction model. These were proactively analyzed and refined using simulation and safety science principles before implementation and were introduced across inpatient units during 2020-2021. Huddle compliance, alerts per non-ICU patient days, and days between sepsis-attributable emergent transfers were monitored. Rapid Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles based on user feedback and weekly metric data informed improvement throughout implementation., Results: There were 264 sepsis alerts on 173 patients with an 89% bedside huddle completion rate and 10 alerts per 1000 non-ICU patient days per month. There was no special cause variation in the metric days between sepsis-attributable emergent transfers., Conclusions: An automated electronic health record-based sepsis prediction model, CDS tools, and sepsis huddle workflows were implemented on inpatient units with a relatively low rate of interruptive alerts and high compliance with bedside huddles. Use of CDS best practices, simulation, safety tools, and quality improvement principles led to high utilization of the sepsis screening process., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Prior criteria for organ dysfunction in critically ill children were based mainly on expert opinion. We convened the Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) expert panel to summarize data characterizing single and multiple organ dysfunction and to derive contemporary criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction. The panel was composed of 88 members representing 47 institutions and 7 countries. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature to derive evidence-based criteria for single organ dysfunction for neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, acute liver, renal, hematologic, coagulation, endocrine, endothelial, and immune system dysfunction. We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020. Study identification was accomplished using a combination of medical subject headings terms and keywords related to concepts of pediatric organ dysfunction. Electronic searches were performed by medical librarians. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the authors reported original data collected in critically ill children; evaluated performance characteristics of scoring tools or clinical assessments for organ dysfunction; and assessed a patient-centered, clinically meaningful outcome. Data were abstracted from each included study into an electronic data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Consensus was achieved for a final set of 43 criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction through iterative voting and discussion. Although the PODIUM criteria for organ dysfunction were limited by available evidence and will require validation, they provide a contemporary foundation for researchers to identify and study single and multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children., Competing Interests: FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)