Search

Unlabelled: Cardiogenic shock develops in 5-15% of patients hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction. It is responsible for more than a half of all hospital deaths with survival rate of about 20%. Conventional medical therapy with use of adrenergic, vasoactive, inotropic and thrombolytic agents has failed to improve survival. Treatment strategy combine hemodynamic stabilisation with restoration of coronary blood flow. The aim of the study was evaluation of mechanical restoration of coronary blood flow in infarction related artery and to assess its influence on mortality in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. We retrospectively analysed 58 subjects: 26 patients treated by primary angioplasty, 25 patients with PTCA angioplasty after streptokinase treatment and 7 ones treated conservatively. TIMI 3 flow in angioplasty treated patients was achieved in 70.6% with in hospital mortality rate 14%, however, when reperfusion was unsuccessful the mortality was high (80%). 12 months follow-up mortality rate was 41.8%., Conclusion: Successful reperfusion with coronary angioplasty of the infarct-related artery can significantly reduce mortality rate in patients with cardiogenic shock. Patients who survived in-hospital period have favourable one-year prognosis.

The aim of the study was a comparison of coronary angioplasty as the method of myocardial infarction treatment in the two groups of patients: 1st--aged 40 years and younger, and 2nd--older than 40 years of age. The 1st group consisted of 50 patients in the mean age of 36.5 +/- 3.5 years, the 2nd group included 617 patients in the mean age of 58.3 +/- 10.1 years. There was no difference between the two groups in pain duration, infarct localization, thrombolysis, and cardiogenic shock. The younger compared with the older patients were significantly more often of male gender: 45 (90.0%) vs 456 (73.9%), (p = 0.01). The young patients were more often smokers: 41 (82.0%) vs 393 (64.0%), (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in an incidence of other coronary risk factors. Coronary angiogram showed that there was no significant difference between the both groups in the infarct-related artery localization, TIMI flow before PTCA and number of stenosed arteries. The frequency successful PTCA (TIMI 3 flow, residual stenosis below 30%) was similar in both groups: 45 (90.0%) vs 549 (89.1%), (p = 0.3). There was no significant difference between two groups in the efficacy of treatment, incidence of reocclusion, complications, and mortality during hospitalization.