Search

Introduction: Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has been confirmed. No absolute recommendations on the use of AB in case of relevant potential risk of UTI have been reported, though some categories of patients at increased infective probability after UDS have been recognized. The aim of this study is to report the experts' consensus on the best practice for the use of AB before UDS in the main categories of patients at potential risk of developing UTI., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was performed on AB before UDS in males and females. A panel of experts from the Italian Society of Urodynamics, Continence, Neuro-Urology, and Pelvic Floor (SIUD) assessed the review data and decided by a modified Delphi method on 16 statements proposed and discussed by the panel. The cut-off percentage for the consensus was a ≥70% of positive responses to the survey. The study was a Delphi consensus with experts' opinions, not a clinical trial involving directly patients., Results: The panel group was composed of 57 experts in functional urology and UDS, mainly urologists, likewise gynaecologists, physiatrists, infectivologists, pediatric urologists, and nurses. A positive consensus was achieved on 9/16 (56.25%) of the statements, especially on the need for performing AB before UD in patients with neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. Urine analysis and urine culture before UDS are mandatory, and in the event of their positivity, UDS should be postponed. A consensus was reached on avoiding AB in menopausal status, diabetes, age, gender, bladder outlet obstruction, high postvoid residual, chronic catheterization, previous urological surgery, lack of urological abnormalities, pelvic organ prolapse, and negative urine analysis., Conclusions: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients without notable risk factors and with a negative urine test due to the potential morbidities that may result from antibiotic administration. However, AB can be used for risk categories such as neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. The evaluation of urine analysis and urine culture and postponing UDS in cases of positive tests were considered good practices, as well as performing AB in the neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: To assess the role of detrusor underactivity (DUA), diagnosed by different urodynamic criteria, on outcomes of women underwent middle urethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI)., Methods: In this prospective study, DUA criteria of women with SUI, naïve for SUI surgery, candidates to MUS were: I Pdet@Qmax ≤10 cm H2O and Qmax ≤12 mL/s (Jeong et al.) ii Pdet@Qmax<30 cm H2O and Qmax<10 mL/s (Abarbanel and Marcus) iii Pdet@Qmax<20 cm H2O and Qmax<15 mL/s and BVE < 90% (BVE criteria) iv Pdet@Qmax<20 cm H2O + Qmax (PIP1 Griffiths) Control group (CG) comprised non-DUA patients. Preoperative and at 2-years follow-up evaluation included physical examination, uroflowmetry, post void residual urine (PVR), ICIQ-FLUTS., Results: 102 patients fulfilled 2-years controls. DUA rate range was 16.7% (BVE) - 53.9% (PIP1-Griffith). The POUR rate varied: 20% (PIP1-Griffith) - 35.3% (BVE), 10% in CG. Tape incision rate for POUR was 3.4% in DUA, 4.5% in CG. No patients had urinary retention at 2-years follow-up. In DUA groups, Qmax did not change significantly after surgery and PVR was low. SUI recurrence rate was 2.8% in DUA, 4.5% in CG. Preoperatively, urgency and post-micturition dribble were the most (82.4%) and the less (26.7%) reported symptoms, respectively. At follow-up, frequency was the most prevalent (56.1%), reduced sensation/bladder pain the less usual (23.1%). ICIQ-FLUTS scores were higher in DUA groups., Conclusions: DUA did not have a negative impact on MUS outcomes in a mid-term follow-up. Early postoperative voiding complication rates changed according to the type of DUA urodynamic criteria., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Resilience represents a fundamental element in the experience of pain, as it allows adaptation to suffering and increases psychological social well-being and quality of life (QoL). We investigated resilience in patients affected by urologic chronic pelvic pain (UCPP) and the relationships with pain severity and distribution, catastrophizing and psychological distress., Methods: Forty-eight consecutive UCPP patients were classified on a pain body map as being affected by pelvic pain only or widespread pain (WP), and underwent the evaluation of resilience with the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14), with higher scores indicating high resilience levels; scores < 56 denote very poor resilience. Pelvic and nonpelvic pain intensity and the bother of urinary symptoms on QoL were measured by means of Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) investigated catastrophizing and psychological conditions., Results: Overall, RS-14 mean ± SD total score was 50.2 ± 12.5 in patients with pelvic pain only and 40.2 ± 10.2 in those with WP. Significant relationships were observed between low resilience levels and high scores of pelvic and nonpelvic PNRS, VAS, pain catastrophizing scale and depression and anxiety, stress scale (for all: p < 0.001). Significantly lower RS-14 scores were detected in females and in patients with WP., Conclusions: A very poor resilience has been identified in UCPP patients, particularly in those with greater catastrophizing and mood alterations. WP and female gender were mostly affected. In UCPP patients, low resilience appears as a crucial factor in pain experience., (© 2021 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic poses a challenge to treatment of patients with urologic chronic pelvic pain (UCPP), who are at risk to be postponed in the priority of care. We investigated pain, catastrophizing, and psychological status in UCPP patients during SARS-CoV-2 by means of Skype telephone calls., Methods: A total of 28 UCPP patients underwent Skype video consultations. Pain intensity was assessed with Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS). Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) were used to assess catastrophizing and psychological status., Results: During SARS-CoV-2, UCPP patients showed higher intensity of pain than before (mean ± SD PNRS score: 7.25 ± 0.9 vs. 5.4 ± 0.7; p < .0001), with pain exacerbation in 75%; they showed higher PCS and DASS-21 scores as compared to before the pandemic (mean ± SD PCS total score: 32.4 ± 1.2 vs. 23.7 ± 3.5; mean ± SD DASS-21 total score: 42.03 ± 4.5 vs. 34.4 ± 2.2; p < .001 and p < .001, respectively)., Conclusion: During SARS-CoV-2 pandemic UCPP patients presented with high intensity of pain, marked catastrophizing thoughts and severe alteration of the psychological status. These observations impose the need not to postpone assessment and treatment of these patients during the pandemic. Remote visits with video telephone calls are a simple way of continuing care in UCPP patients., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes of unobstructed patients with detrusor underactivity (DUA), comparing the surgical results between obstructed and unobstructed males with concomitant DUA, at midterm follow-up., Methods: This was an observational, prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. Candidates to TURP underwent preoperative urodynamics (UD), with a diagnosis of DUA, were divided in two cohorts: Group A unobstructed men, group B males with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Males were evaluated yearly with uroflowmetry (UF), post-void residual (PVR), and bladder voiding efficiency (BVE), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, visual analogic scale (VAS) for subjective assessment of the quality of life. The degree of the variation of maximum flow rate (Qmax), PVR, BVE, IPSS, VAS between baseline and follow-up (Δ) was evaluated., Results: Patients in group A were 28 and in group B 23. Overall patient's mean ± SD age was 63.37 ± 12.41 years. Preoperative urodynamics characteristics: mean bladder contractility index (BCI) of 61.15 and 76.25 in group A and B, respectively; mean bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) of 17.25 and 50.15 in group A and group B, respectively. After surgery, overall patient group, group A, and group B showed a statistical improvement in IPSS score (P < .0001), Qmax (P < .0001), PVR (P < .0008), BVE (P < .03) and VAS (P < .0001)., Conclusions: BOO had an important impact on the degree of improvement of Qmax and PVR/BVE, while had a poor influence on lower urinary tract symptoms amelioration. The most relevant outcomes were found when BOO was associated with DUA, which was not a contraindication to surgery., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: To assess the long-term complications and outcomes in patients treated for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with transvaginal anterior colporrhaphy (AC) alone, transvaginal naterior AC with reinforcement by using porcine Xenograft (AC-P) (Pelvisoft® Biomesh), and transvaginal anterior repair with polypropylene mesh (AC-M)., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 109/123 consecutive patients, who underwent cystocele repair: 42 AC, 19 AC-P, and 48 AC-M. Subjective outcomes included validated questionnaires as well as questions that had not been previously validated. Objective outcomes have been evaluated considering failure the anterior vaginal wall recurrence >2 stage POP-Quantification. Statistical analysis included the chi-square or Fisher exact test., Results: The mean follow-up was 94.80 ± 51.72 months (19-192 months). In all groups, the patient's personal satisfaction was high. There was no evidence of difference in outcome based on whether a biological graft was or was not performed, or whether synthetic mesh was used to reinforce the repair. Data showed a higher rate of complications in the AC-M group (P < 0.05) that could explain the lower subjective satisfaction of these patients., Conclusions: This study evaluated long-term outcomes to anterior vaginal repair over a period of more than 5 years in all the groups. Our data show that anterior vaginal repair with mesh and xenograft did not improve significantly objective and subjective outcomes. Rather, prosthetic device use leads to higher rate of complications., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: To characterize the factors contributing to changes in baseline abdominal pressure (P(abd)) and the correlation between DeltaVLPP, VLPP(tot), and other clinical and urodynamic variables., Methods: Two hundred sixty-four female patients who had undergone an anti-incontinence procedure between February 1994 and October 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. The urodynamics performed for each patient included abdominal and vesical pressures measured in a standardized manner with the patient sitting upright and the pressure sensors maintained at the level of the symphysis pubis. VLPP was determined at bladder volumes of 200 mL during a gradually increasing Valsalva maneuver., Results: Baseline P(abd) varied between 10 and 55 cm H(2)O (mean, 32.7 +/- 8.8) and were significantly correlated with patient weight (P<0.001) and with patient body mass index (P<0.001). Baseline P(abd) was not found to be correlated with patient age, Baden and Walker Classification of the grading of pelvic floor prolapse, degree of incontinence (determined by the number of pads used per day), or prior surgical procedures for stress incontinence. Higher baseline P(abd) were significantly correlated with the peak abdominal pressure reached during the Valsalva maneuver (P<0.0001) and with VLPP(tot) (P<0.0001) but not with DeltaVLPP. Higher VLPP(tot) significantly correlated with decreased age (P=0.004), less severe incontinence (P=0.004), higher peak Valsalva pressure (P<0.0001), and the ability to increase abdominal pressure for a longer period of time (time to peak P(abd) during Valsalva). VLPP(tot) and DeltaVLPP had similar statistical correlation with all the clinical variables examined and neither could predict the outcome of any anti-incontinence surgery. By using a VLPP of 60 cm H(2)O as a cutoff to differentiate severe ISD from GSUI, 211 (67.4%) of the patients would be categorized as having ISD according to their DeltaVLPP compared with only 106 (40.1%) by using the VLPP(tot)., Conclusions: Baseline P(abd) varies considerably among patients, is correlated with patient weight and habitus. In addition, it varies with both the ability to be increased for longer periods of time and with VLPP(tot). Looking at VLPP(tot) and DeltaVLPP will result in a different categorization of the type of incontinence in at least 25% of patients and, thus, affect the physician's selection of an anti-incontinence procedure for an individual patient., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)