Search

Abstract Introduction Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss in developed countries. However, a significant gap persists in understanding this population, exacerbated by their advanced age and visual impairments, which can hinder research participation and access to healthcare. The purpose of this study was to describe the content of the questionnaire and the participating patients with nAMD. Methods The survey includes patients diagnosed with nAMD who had previously received treatment or were currently undergoing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Participants were recruited using various methods, as reaching out to patients who are no longer receiving treatment poses a particular challenge. A patient and public advisory board assisted throughout the study period. Results Of the 713 electronic invitations sent out, 494 (69.3%) patients responded to the questionnaire, with an additional 57 responses obtained through e-mail or telephone interviews. Due to the exclusion of 16 responses, there were a total of 535 valid responses, including 176 from patients previously treated and 359 from those currently undergoing treatment for nAMD. The median age of respondents was 79.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 75.5–84.7), with 59.8% being women. Among them, 53.2% were married, while 43.1% lived alone. Conclusions Data from the I-OPTA (Identification of Patient-Reported Barriers in Treatment for nAMD) questionnaire allows future exploration of patients who are no longer receiving treatment, patients’ knowledge about preventive measures, and the impact of nAMD on visual function and quality of life. Future research, including studies that integrate data from corresponding retinal images and Danish national registers, has the potential to generate invaluable knowledge, providing benefits to both patients and healthcare professionals.

Abstract Introduction This study reports our experiences with systematic retinal screening in Denmark through optometrists with access to tele-ophthalmological services before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We evaluated an optometrist-based retinal screening system with a referral option for tele-ophthalmological service by a consultant ophthalmologist within the time period of August 1, 2018 to September 30, 2023. The optometrist collected patient history, refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, basic slit-lamp examination, 4-in-1 visual field report, and retinal imaging using color fundus 45° photography. Tele-ophthalmological services were provided by consultant ophthalmologists. Within pre-defined periods of pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19, we evaluated the rate of referrals to the tele-ophthalmological service, diagnoses made, and referrals to the public healthcare system. Results A total of 1,142,028 unique individuals, which corresponded to 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark, underwent screening by the optometrists; 50,612 (4.4%) of these individuals were referred to the tele-ophthalmological examination by consultant ophthalmologists. A referral for further ophthalmic examination, either at hospital or at an ophthalmic practice, was made for 10,300 individuals (20.4% of those referred for tele-ophthalmology, corresponding to 0.9% of the population screened). The referral rate from the screening to the tele-ophthalmological service increased from before COVID-19 (3.4%) to during COVID-19 (4.3%) and further after COVID-19 (6.4%). This increase coincided with an increasing prevalence of conditions seen in the tele-ophthalmological service. Conclusion During a period of 5 years, 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark underwent retinal screening. This provided an adjunctive health service during a period of severe strain on the public healthcare system, while limiting the number of excessive referrals to the public healthcare system. Temporal trends illustrated an increased pattern of use of a large-scale tele-ophthalmological system.

Abstract The port delivery system (PDS) of anti-VEGF therapy provides continuous delivery of ranibizumab (RBZ). In October of 2021, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the PDS with RBZ as a treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As the field of PDS with RBZ is progressing rapidly, this narrative review provides a much-needed overview of existing clinical trials as well as ongoing and upcoming trials investigating PDS with RBZ. The phase 2 LADDER trial reported that the mean time to first refill with RBZ PDS 100 mg/ml was 15.8 months (80% CI 12.1–20.6), and pharmacokinetic profiling revealed a sustained concentration of RBZ in serum and aqueous humor. Later, the phase 3 ARCHWAY trial reported that PDS with RBZ (100 mg/ml) refilled every 24 weeks was non-inferior to monthly intravitreal injection (IVI) with RBZ (0.5 mg) in patients with nAMD over 9 months and 2 years. However, patients with PDS had a higher rate of adverse events including vitreous hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Patients indicate high treatment satisfaction with both PDS and IVI, but the lower number of treatments with PDS was reported as a preferred choice. Several ongoing and future clinical trials, of which details are discussed in this paper, are further exploring the potentials of PDS with RBZ. We conclude that the PDS provides continuous deliverance of RBZ and that clinical efficacy levels are non-inferior to IVI therapy for nAMD. Yet, a higher rate of adverse events remains a concerning detail for widespread implementation. Future studies are warranted to better understand which patients may benefit best from this treatment approach, if long-term efficacy can be sustained, and if safety of PDS can be further improved.

Abstract Introduction This review aims to assess the efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab—a dual vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2 inhibitor—in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macula oedema (DMO). It summarises the findings of current studies on faricimab and discusses whether this new drug may fill a gap in current treatment options. Methods We performed a search of the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE databases for publications on faricimab between 29 November 2022 and 10 May 2023, and a search of ClinicalTrials.gov for the protocols on clinical trials for this review. We included clinical trials, case–control studies and observational studies. Results In phase 3 trials of nAMD, the efficacy of faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept (+ 5.8–6.6 vs. + 5.1–6.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters). At study end, 80% of faricimab-treated patients were on ≥ 12-week dosing intervals, and 44.9–45.7% of faricimab-treated patients were on 16-week dosing intervals. Total adverse events, as well as serious ocular adverse events, were comparable between groups. In phase 3 trials of DMO, efficacy of faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept (+ 10.7–11.8 vs. + 10.3–10.9 ETDRS letters). At study end, > 70% of patients in the personalised treatment interval faricimab group were on ≥ 12-week dosing intervals, and 51–53% were on 16-week dosing intervals. Total adverse events were comparable between groups, although the rate of serious ocular adverse events was higher in the faricimab groups than in the aflibercept groups (1.9–3.1% vs. 0.6–1.9%, respectively). In real-world studies of treatment-resistant nAMD or DMO, faricimab demonstrated superior efficacy compared to aflibercept. In a real-world study of mostly previously treated nAMD, faricimab demonstrated some efficacy. Conclusion Faricimab demonstrated non-inferior to superior efficacy, strong durability and acceptable safety in treatment-naïve nAMD and mostly treatment-naïve DMO, as well as superior efficacy in treatment-resistant nAMD and DMO. However, further research is needed on faricimab in real-world settings.

Abstract Introduction There is little understanding of long-term treatment persistence in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME), particularly relating to treatment intervals. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment interval and discontinuation rate after 24 months of unilateral anti-VEGF treatment in patients with DME under routine clinical care in the USA. Methods This was a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study to review the health insurance claims of adults with DME linked with the IBM MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases, who were continuously enrolled in a health plan for at least 6 months prior to their first anti-VEGF treatment and for a duration of at least 24 months between July 2011 and June 2017. Patients were grouped on the basis of the injection interval they achieved at 24 months of treatment. Discontinuation rate beyond 24 months and its association with treatment intervals at 24 months was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The overall discontinuation rate among the 1702 eligible patients from 24 to 60 months after treatment initiation was 30%. At 60 months, patients were more likely to remain on treatment in shorter (75.3% [4-week interval group]) versus longer treatment interval groups (62.1% [> 12-week interval group], difference = 13.2%, [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 2.06], p = 0.01). Patients on a > 12-week interval were twice as likely to discontinue treatment compared with those on an 8-week interval (hazard ratio = 2.01 [95% CI 1.43, 2.82], p