Search

Your search keyword '"De Jong, Kenneth"' showing total 48 results
Start Over Author "De Jong, Kenneth" Publisher acm
48 results on '"De Jong, Kenneth"'

24. SAX-EFG

Author

Kamath, Uday, primary, Lin, Jessica, additional, and De Jong, Kenneth, additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Genetic programming needs better benchmarks

Author

McDermott, James, primary, White, David R., additional, Luke, Sean, additional, Manzoni, Luca, additional, Castelli, Mauro, additional, Vanneschi, Leonardo, additional, Jaskowski, Wojciech, additional, Krawiec, Krzysztof, additional, Harper, Robin, additional, De Jong, Kenneth, additional, and O'Reilly, Una-May, additional

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Genetic programming needs better benchmarks

Author

Wojciech Jaskowski, Sean Luke, James McDermott, Luca Manzoni, David White, Mauro Castelli, Leonardo Vanneschi, Krzysztof Krawiec, Kenneth de Jong, Robin Harper, Una-May O'Reilly, Mcdermott, J, White, D, Luke, S, Manzoni, L, Castelli, M, Vanneschi, L, Jaśkowski, W, Krawiec, K, Harper, R, De Jong, K, O'Reilly, U, Terence Soule, Jason H. Moore, Mcdermott, Jame, White David, R., Luke, Sean, Manzoni, Luca, Castelli, Mauro, Vanneschi, Leonardo, Jaskowski, Wojciech, Krawiec, Krzysztof, Harper, Robin, De Jong, Kenneth, and O'Reilly, Una-May

Subjects
Standardization, business.industry, Computer science, Applied Mathematics, benchmarks, genetic programming, Genetic programming, Benchmarking, Data science, Field (computer science), benchmark, Computational Theory and Mathematic, Benchmark (computing), Artificial intelligence, business, Set (psychology), Implementation
Abstract

Genetic programming (GP) is not a field noted for the rigor of its benchmarking. Some of its benchmark problems are popular purely through historical contingency, and they can be criticized as too easy or as providing misleading information concerning real-world performance, but they persist largely because of inertia and the lack of good alternatives. Even where the problems themselves are impeccable, comparisons between studies are made more difficult by the lack of standardization. We argue that the definition of standard benchmarks is an essential step in the maturation of the field. We make several contributions towards this goal. We motivate the development of a benchmark suite and define its goals; we survey existing practice; we enumerate many candidate benchmarks; we report progress on reference implementations; and we set out a concrete plan for gathering feedback from the GP community that would, if adopted, lead to a standard set of benchmarks. © 2012 ACM.

Published
2012

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results