Search

Information Retrieval (IR) methods have been recently employed to provide automatic support for bug localization tasks. However, for an IR-based bug localization tool to be useful, it has to achieve adequate retrieval accuracy. Lower precision and recall can leave developers with large amounts of incorrect information to wade through. To address this issue, in this paper, we systematically investigate the impact of combining various IR methods on the retrieval accuracy of bug localization engines. The main assumption is that different IR methods, targeting different dimensions of similarity between artifacts, can be used to enhance the confidence in each others' results. Five benchmark systems from different application domains are used to conduct our analysis. The results show that a) near-optimal global configurations can be determined for different combinations of IR methods, b) optimized IR-hybrids can significantly outperform individual methods as well as other unoptimized methods, and c) hybrid methods achieve their best performance when utilizing information-theoretic IR methods. Our findings can be used to enhance the practicality of IR-based bug localization tools and minimize the cognitive overload developers often face when locating bugs.

Open Source Software (OSS) projects start with an initial vocabulary, often determined by the first generation of developers. This vocabulary, embedded in code identifier names and internal code comments, goes through multiple rounds of change, influenced by the interrelated patterns of human (e.g., developers joining and departing) and system (e.g., maintenance activities) interactions. Capturing the dynamics of this change is crucial for understanding and synthesizing code changes over time. However, existing code evolution analysis tools, available in modern version control systems such as GitHub and SourceForge, often overlook the linguistic aspects of code evolution. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose to study code evolution in OSS projects through the lens of developers' language, also known as code lexicon. Our analysis is conducted using 32 OSS projects sampled from a broad range of application domains. Our results show that different maintenance activities impact code lexicon differently. These insights lay out a preliminary foundation for modeling the linguistic history of OSS projects. In the long run, this foundation will be utilized to provide support for basic program comprehension tasks and help researchers gain new insights into the complex interplay between linguistic change and various system and human aspects of OSS development.

Requirements-to-source-code traceability employs information retrieval (IR) methods to automatically link requirements to the source code that implements them. A crucial step in this process is indexing, where partial and important information from the software artifacts is converted into a representation that is compatible with the underlying IR model. Source code demands special attention in the indexing process. In this paper, we investigate source code indexing for supporting automatic traceability. We introduce a feature diagram that captures the key components and their relationships in the domain of source code indexing. We then present an experiment to examine the features of the diagram and their dependencies. Results show that utilizing comments has a significant effect on traceability link generation, and stemming is required when comments are considered.

A major software engineering challenge is to understand the fundamental mechanisms that underlie the developer's code navigation behavior. We propose a novel and unified theory based on the premise that we can study developer's information seeking strategies in light of the foraging principles that evolved to help our animal ancestors to find food. Our preliminary study on code navigation graphs suggests that the tenets of information foraging provide valuable insight into software maintenance. Our research opens the avenue towards the development of ecologically valid tool support to augment developers' code search skills.