Search

Decision making regarding adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer is complex. The aim of this study was to determine patients' and clinicians' minimally desired survival benefit to choose chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Moreover, influencing factors and importance of positive and negative treatment effects (i.e. attribute) were investigated. Patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and multidisciplinary gynaecologic oncology clinicians completed a trade-off questionnaire based on PORTEC-3 trial data. In total, 171 patients and 63 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Median minimally desired benefit to make chemoradiotherapy worthwhile was significantly higher for patients versus clinicians (10% vs 5%, p = 0.02). Both patients and clinicians rated survival benefit most important during decision making, followed by long-term symptoms. Older patients (OR 0.92 [95%CI 0.87–0.97]; p = 0.003) with comorbidity (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.89]; p = 0.035) had lower preference for chemoradiotherapy, while patients with better numeracy skills (OR 1.2 [95%CI 1.05–1.36], p = 0.011) and chemoradiotherapy history (OR 25.0 [95%CI 8.8–91.7]; p < 0.001) had higher preference for chemoradiotherapy. There is a considerable difference in minimally desired survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer among and between patients and clinicians. Overall, endometrial cancer patients needed higher benefits than clinicians before preferring chemoradiotherapy. • Desired benefit to choose adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed in endometrial cancer. • Desired benefit varied considerably among and between patients and clinicians. • Patients desired higher survival benefit than clinicians to choose chemoradiotherapy. • Survival benefit and long-term symptoms are most important in decision making. • Patient preferences are strongly influenced by treatment history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To investigate if analysis of genetic alterations in the main pathways involved in endometrioid type carcinogenesis (PI3K–AKT, Wnt/β-catenin, P53-activation and MSI) improves the current risk assessment based on clinicopathological factors. Methods: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary tumor samples of 65 patients with FIGO-stage I endometrioid type endometrial cancer (EEC) were selected from the randomized PORTEC-2 trial. Tumors were stained by immunohistochemistry for P53, PTEN and β-catenin. Tumor DNA was isolated for sequence analysis of TP53 (exons 4 to 8), hotspot mutation analysis of KRAS (exon 1) and PI3K (exon 9 and 20) and microsatellite-instability (MSI) analysis including MLH1 promotor-methylation status. Univariate and multivariate analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox regression models were performed. Results: P53 status (HR 6.7, 95%CI 1.75–26.0, p=0.006) and MSI were the strongest single genetic prognostic factors for decreased DFS, while high PI3K–AKT pathway activation showed a trend and β-catenin was not prognostic. The combination of multiple activated pathways was the most powerful prognostic factor for decreased DFS (HR 5.0; 95%CI 1.59–15.6 p=0.006). Multiple pathway activation, found in 8% of patients, was strongly associated with aggressive clinical course. In contrast, 40% of patients had no alterations in the investigated pathways and had a very low risk of disease progression. Conclusions: Activation of multiple oncogenic pathways in EEC was the most powerful prognostic factor for decreased DFS, resulting in an individual risk assessment superior to the current approach based on clinicopathological factors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the rates of local control and survival after relapse in patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated in the multicenter randomized PORTEC trial.: MethodsThe PORTEC trial included 715 patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer, either grade 1 or 2 with deep (>50%) myometrial invasion or grade 2 or 3 with <50% invasion. In all cases an abdominal hysterectomy was performed, without lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive pelvic RT (46 Gy) or no further treatment.: ResultsThe analysis was done by intention-to-treat. A total of 714 patients were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 73 months, 8-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 4% in the RT group and 15% in the control group (P < 0.0001). The 8-year actuarial overall survival rates were 71 (RT group) and 77% (control group, P = 0.18). Eight-year rates of distant metastases were 10 and 6% (P = 0.20). The majority of the locoregional relapses were located in the vagina, mainly in the vaginal vault. Of the 39 patients with isolated vaginal relapse, 35 (87%) were treated with curative intent, usually with external RT and brachytherapy, and surgery in some. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 31 of the 35 patients (89%), and 24 patients (77%) were still in CR after further follow-up. Five patients subsequently developed distant metastases, and 2 had a second vaginal recurrence. The 3-year survival after first relapse was 51% for patients in the control group and 19% in the RT group (P = 0.004). The 3-year survival after vaginal relapse was 73%, in contrast to 8 and 14% after pelvic and distant relapse (P < 0.001). At 5 years, the survival after vaginal relapse was 65% in the control group compared to 43% in the RT group.: ConclusionSurvival after relapse was significantly better in the patient group without previous RT. Treatment for vaginal relapse was effective, with 89% CR and 65% 5-year survival in the control group, while there was no difference in survival between patients with pelvicrelapse and those with distant metastases. As pelvic RT was shown to improve locoregional control significantly, but without a survival benefit, its use should be limited to those patients at sufficiently high risk (15% or over) for recurrence in order to maximize local control and relapse-free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]