Search

Abstract: The peakedness of a random variable (RV) about a point is defined by . A RV is said to be less peaked about than a RV about , denoted by , if for all , i.e., is stochastically larger than . These generalize the original definitions of Birnbaum (1948) who considered the cases where and were symmetric about and , respectively. Statistical inferences about the distribution functions of continuous and under peakedness ordering in the symmetric case have been treated in the literature. Rojo et al. (2007) provided estimators of the distributions in the general case and analyzed their properties. We show that these estimators could have poor asymptotic properties relative to those of the empiricals. We provide improved estimators of the DFs, show that they are consistent, derive the weak convergence of the estimators, compare them with the empirical estimators, and provide formulas for statistical inferences. An example is also used to illustrate our theoretical results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In competing risks studies, the Kaplan–Meier estimators of the distribution functions (DFs) of lifetimes and the corresponding estimators of cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) are used widely when no prior information is available for these distributions. In some cases better estimators of the DFs of lifetimes are available when they obey some inequality constraints, e.g., if two lifetimes are stochastically or uniformly stochastically ordered, or some functional of a DF obeys an inequality in an empirical likelihood estimation procedure. If the restricted estimator of a lifetime differs from the unrestricted one, then the usual estimators of the CIFs will not add up to the lifetime estimator. In this paper we show how to estimate the CIFs in this case. These estimators are shown to be strongly uniformly consistent. In all cases we consider, when the inequality constraints are strict the asymptotic properties of the restricted and the unrestricted estimators are the same, thus providing the asymptotic properties of the restricted estimators essentially “free of charge”. We give an example to illustrate our procedure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]