Search

The lack of reliable markers for the early diagnosis of allograft rejection is a major obstacle preventing improved results in clinical pancreas transplantation. Using a vascularized whole-pancreas transplant model in the rat, with exocrine ductal drainage into the lower urinary tract, we explored the possibility that a change in an index of pancreatic function (IPF), viz., urine volume, urine pH, and urine amylase (UA) in composite, may provide an earlier and more specific indicator of rejection than a decline in UA levels alone. Six Lewis-to-Lewis rat isograft and 12 ACI-to-Lewis allograft recipients were studied. Ten nontransplanted diabetic Lewis rats served as a control group. Euglycemia was restored in all the recipients of isografts, and was maintained for over a year. In the allograft group, rejection occurred on Days 7-9, with a mean graft survival time of 8.1 +/- 0.1 days. Peak UA levels and IPF during normal allograft function were 2422 +/- 353 U/ml and 100 +/- 14, respectively, whereas levels heralding rejection were 600 U/ml and 25 (P less than 0.05). The diagnosis of rejection based on the IPF resulted in significantly greater specificity and an earlier prediction time compared with UA alone (2.4 +/- 0.3 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2 days); the IPF permitted the successful prediction of rejection 3 or more days prior to hyperglycemia in 6 of 12 (50%) grafts, whereas only 1 of 12 (8%) rejection episodes was successfully predicted when the rejection criterion was based on UA. In conclusion, early diagnosis of rejection was achieved by a composite index of pancreatic function, improving the ability to predict pancreas-allograft rejection 24 to 48 hr prior to a fall in UA levels.

A rat cardiac allograft model (ACl to Lewis) was used to investigate the clonal deletion theory. Twelve groups of Lewis recipients received various combinations of donor-specific blood transfusions (DSTs), immediate post-DST immunosuppression with azathioprine/prednisone, and low-dose cyclosporine (1 mg/kg/day) posttransplant. DSTs and cyclosporine together gave modest prolongation of graft survival (from 6.0 to 17 days). DSTs plus immediate post-DST immunosuppression followed by low-dose cyclosporine prolonged graft survival to an average of 45 days. Third-party transfusions alone and in combination with immunosuppression did not significantly prolong allograft survival. Postoperative cyclosporine was required for the expression of this effect suggesting that clonal depression rather than clonal deletion had occurred. Combining DSTs with brief but intense preoperative immunosuppression may be a more effective method of pretransplant conditioning than DSTs alone.