Search

Food production has a profound eutrophication impact on waterbodies via nutrient leaching. To provide reliable life cycle assessments of the eutrophication potential of agricultural products, accurate nitrogen leaching models are needed. Although many dynamic nitrogen leaching models are in use, their suitability for farm-level assessments remains limited when their requirements for site specific data or numerous parameters are not met. In Finland, less data intensive leaching models for life cycle assessments have been developed using data from conventional farming, however, the suitability of these models for organic farming remains unknown. In this work, we developed new nitrogen leaching models that are applicable to both conventional and organic production. While this paper does not aim to argue in favor of organic or conventional farming it provides tools that can be used to inform decisions about management practices from the environmental perspective. We utilized up to 16 years of field measurements from two leaching fields in Finland. We developed prediction equations for nitrogen leaching for two soil types: sand soil and clay soil. According to our statistical analysis based on the data, the relevant factors for explaining nitrogen leaching included soil type, rainfall, whether the farming is done organically, and the availability of nitrogen for leaching. Computed nitrogen balance as such was found to be a poor proxy for nitrogen available for leaching, while nitrate nitrogen concentration measurement of the soil carried out in the fall was found to be a valuable predictor. Organic farming, with a crop rotation resembling that of conventional farming, resulted on average in 20% less nitrogen leached per hectare as compared to conventional farming with 95% C.I. [-34%, -3%]. The developed models are suitable for integration into a life cycle assessment framework, and especially the models utilizing nitrate nitrogen were shown to be applicable to a wide range of different crop types, making the model well-suited for plots with diverse crop rotations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: financial support was provided by Business Finland., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Nature-based solutions (NbS) can be beneficial to help human communities build resilience to climate change by managing and mitigating related hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs). Substantial research has been carried out in the past on the detection and assessment of HMHs and their derived risks. Yet, knowledge on the performance and functioning of NbS to address these hazards is severely lacking. The latter is exacerbated by the lack of practical and viable approaches that would help identify and select NbS for specific problems. The EU-funded OPERANDUM project established seven Open-Air Laboratories (OALs) across Europe to co-develop, test, and generate an evidence base from innovative NbS deployed to address HMHs such as flooding, droughts, landslides, erosion, and eutrophication. Herein, we detail the original approaches that each OAL followed in the process of identifying and selecting NbS for specific hazards with the aim of proposing a novel, generic framework for selecting NbS. We found that the process of selecting NBS was overall complex and context-specific in all the OALs, and it comprised 26 steps distributed across three stages: (i) Problem recognition, (ii) NbS identification, and (iii) NbS selection. We also identified over 20 selection criteria which, in most cases, were shared across OALs and were chiefly related to sustainability aspects. All the identified NbS were related to the regulation of the water cycle, and they were mostly chosen according to three main factors: (i) hazard type, (ii) hazard scale, and (iii) OAL size. We noticed that OALs exposed to landslides and erosion selected NbS capable to manage water budgets within the soil compartment at the local or landscape scale, while OALs exposed to floods, droughts, and eutrophication selected approaches to managing water transport and storage at the catchment scale. We successfully portrayed a synthesis of the stages and steps followed in the OALs' NbS selection process in a framework. The framework, which reflects the experiences of the stakeholders involved, is inclusive and integrated, and it can serve as a basis to inform NbS selection processes whilst facilitating the organisation of diverse stakeholders working towards finding solutions to natural hazards. We animate the future development of the proposed framework by integrating financial viability steps. We also encourage studies looking into the implementation of the proposed framework through quantitative approaches integrating multi-criteria analyses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Alejandro Gonzalez Ollauri reports financial support was provided by European Commission., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)