Search

Purpose: Perampanel (PER) is expanding the therapeutic scope for pediatric epilepsy owing to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. However, concerns about psychiatric and behavioral adverse events (PBAEs) in combination therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) continue to contribute to hesitation in its prescription. We investigated the risk profiles for PBAEs when adding PER to pediatric epilepsy treatment and analyzed the differences according to the presence of concomitant LEV., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children aged 4-18 years with epilepsy who were prescribed PER as adjunctive therapy from March 2016 to February 2023. We compared the occurrence and management of PBAEs between the PER without LEV and PER with LEV groups. The risk factors for PBAEs were also analyzed., Results: Ninety-four patients (53 boys and 41 girls) were included in this study. The median age of total patients at the time of adding PER was 14.9 years (12.3-16.4 years), and 53 patients (56.4 %) had concomitant LEV. Forty-seven PBAEs occurred in 34 patients (36.2 %), with no significant differences depending on whether concomitant LEV is present or not. The most common PBAEs were aggression (14.9 %), irritability (9.6 %), affect lability (7.4 %), and acute psychosis (6.4 %). PBAEs occurred at a lower dosage (2-6 mg/day) in 70.6 % of the patients. In addition, 73.5 % of patients with PBAEs continued PER treatment by follow-up observation or by reducing the PER dosage. No risk factors, such as the presence of concomitant LEV or lamotrigine, any comorbid conditions, higher PER dosage (8-12 mg/day), two or more concomitant anti-seizure medications, and younger age (<13 years) at PER add-on, showed significant associations., Conclusion: When expanding the use of anti-seizure medications in pediatric patients, real-world evidence on safety issues is crucial for pediatric epileptologists. We confirmed that combination therapy with PER and LEV did not increase the risk profile of PBAEs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Previous studies showed inconsistent results on the association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with multiple sclerosis (MS), and are limited by a lack of adjustment for sex and age. The goals of this retrospective cohort study were to evaluate whether SSc is associated with increased incident MS independent of sex and age., Methods: We enrolled patients with SSc from Taiwan's Registry of Catastrophic Illness Database and referent subjects from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Each SSc patient was matched to at most three referent subjects by sex, age, month and year of initial diagnosis of SSc. Incidence of MS in SSc patients and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Cox hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of MS., Results: The study enrolled 1171 patients with SSc and 3409 referent subjects. Patients with SSc had higher incidence of MS than referent subjects (9.35 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI=6.86-11.85; 0.13 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI=0.03-0.37, respectively). Similar results also occurred in both men and women. SSc was associated with increased incidence of MS after adjusting for sex and age (HR: 69.48, 95% CI=21.69-222.54)., Conclusion: SSc is associated with increased incidence of MS, independent of sex and age of the patients. Multidisciplinary teams should guide the assessment, treatment, and holistic care of SSc patients to reduce its morbidity., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)