Search

Hippocampal atrophy rates have been used in a number of studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) to assess disease progression and are being increasingly utilized as an outcome measure in clinical trials of new pharmaceutical agents. Owing to the labor-intensive nature of hippocampal segmentation, more automated approaches are required for such analysis. In this study we compared methods of automatically segmenting the hippocampus (single-person template and template library) on the baseline image in a group of probable AD (n=36) and control (n=19) subjects with serial images. Using the method that gave most similar results to manual, three automated methods of calculating change within the hippocampal region were compared: fluid change calculated using (1) Jacobian change or (2) region propagation and (3) boundary shift. Rates were compared with manual measures. We found that segmentation of baseline hippocampus was most accurate using a template library combined with morphological operations (intensity thresholding plus one conditional dilation). This gave a voxel similarity of 0.69 (0.05) and 0.72 (0.06) in controls and probable AD subjects respectively compared with manual measures. Atrophy rates within these regions were most similar to the manual rates using the boundary shift integral (mean difference from manual rate 0.03% (1.29) in controls and 0.48% (2.44) in AD). A template library segmentation approach, together with morphological operations, provides a segmentation accurate enough to quantify relative change over time. The change over time can then be calculated automatically using boundary shift or fluid measures, with boundary shift giving most similar results to manual.

MRI-derived rates of hippocampal atrophy may serve as surrogate markers of disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Manual delineation is the gold standard in hippocampal volumetry; however, this technique is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aimed to compare regional non-linear (fluid) registration measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates against manual delineation in MCI. Hippocampi of 18 subjects were manually outlined twice on MRI scan-pairs (interval+/-SD: 2.01+/-0.11 years), and volumes were subtracted to calculate change over time. Following global affine and local rigid registration, regional fluid registration was performed from which atrophy rates were derived from the Jacobian determinants over the hippocampal region. Atrophy rates as derived by fluid registration were computed using both forward (repeat onto baseline) and backward (baseline onto repeat) registration. Reliability for both methods and agreement between methods was assessed. Mean+/-SD hippocampal atrophy rates (%/year) derived by manual delineation were: left: 2.13+/-1.62; right: 2.36+/-1.78 and for regional fluid registration: forward: left: 2.39+/-1.68; right: 2.49+/-1.52 and backward: left: 2.21+/-1.51; right: 2.42+/-1.49. Mean hippocampal atrophy rates did not differ between both methods. Reliability for manual hippocampal volume measurements (cross-sectional) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): baseline and follow-up, left and right, >0.99). However, the resulting ICC for manual measurements of hippocampal volume change (longitudinal) was considerably lower (left: 0.798; right: 0.850) compared with regional fluid registration (forward: left: 0.985; right: 0.988 and backward: left: 0.975; right: 0.989). We conclude that regional fluid registration is more reliable than manual delineation in assessing hippocampal atrophy rates, without sacrificing sensitivity to change. This method may be useful to quantify hippocampal volume change, given the reduction in operator time and improved precision.

The application of voxel-level three-dimensional registration to serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is described. This fluid registration determines deformation fields modeling brain change, which are consistent with a model describing a viscous fluid. The objective was to validate the measurement of hippocampal volumetric change by fluid registration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) against current methodologies. The hippocampus was chosen for this study because it is difficult to measure reproducibly by manual segmentation and is widely studied; however, the technique is applicable to any structure which can be delineated on a scan. First, suitable values for the viscosity-body-force-ratio, alpha (0.01), and the number of iterations (300), were established and the convergence, repeatability, linearity, and accuracy investigated and compared with expert manual segmentation. A simple model of hippocampal atrophy was used to compare simulated volumetric change against that obtained by fluid registration. Finally the serial segmentation was compared with the current gold standard technique-expert human labeling with a volume repeatability of approximately 4%-in 27 subjects (15 normal controls, 12 clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease). The scan-rescan volumetric consistency of serial segmentation by fluid-registration was shown to be superior to human serial segmentors ( approximately 2%). The mean absolute volume difference between fluid and manual segmentation was 0.7%. Fluid registration has potential importance for tracking longitudinal structural changes in brain particularly in the context of the clinical trial where large numbers of subjects may have multiple MR scans., (Copyright 2001 Academic Press.)