Search

Introduction: Patients with pectus excavatum (PE) often undergo cross-sectional imaging (CSI) to quantify severity for insurance authorization before surgical repair. The modified percent depth (MPD), an external caliper-based metric, was previously validated to be similar to the pectus index and correction index. This study explored family perceptions of CSI and MPD with respect to value and costs., Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey study including families of patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective multicenter study evaluating the use of MPD as an alternative to CSI for quantifying PE severity. Families of PE patients who underwent both MPD and CSI completed a survey to determine their perceptions of MPD and costs of CSI. Responses were described and associations were evaluated using chi squared, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression as appropriate. Statistical significance was set to 0.05., Results: There were 136 surveys completed for a response rate of 88%. Respondents were confident in MPD (86%) and confident in its similarity to CSI (76%). Families of females were less confident in the measurements than males (55% versus 80%, P = 0.02; odds ratio 0.30 (0.11, 0.83). Obtaining CSI required time off work/school in 90% and a copay in 60%. Nearly half (49%) of respondents reported CSI was a time/financial hardship. Increasing copay led to decreased reassurance in CSI (55%: copay > $100 versus 77%: lower copay/75%: no copay; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: From the family perspective, MPD is valuable in assessing the severity of PE. Obtaining CSI was financially burdensome, particularly for those with higher copays. MPD measurements provide high value at low cost in assessing the severity of PE., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Firearm injury is the leading cause of death in children. The recent rise has coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trends of pediatric firearm injury over a 6-y period, to include the COVID-19 pandemic, at our pediatric trauma center., Methods: A retrospective review of the trauma registry at a free-standing children's hospital from January 2018 to December 2023 was performed. The variables evaluated included year of injury, age of injury, race, gender, admission requirements, need for blood products, need for operation, mortality, insurance type, and reason for injury., Results: There were 397 firearm injury presentations identified over the 6-y period. The median age of injury was 13 y with an interquartile range of 6-15 y. Most were male (72.3%) and of Black race (74.6%). A majority of children who sustained a firearm injury had Medicaid (77.8%). During the years of 2018 and 2019, we evaluated 40 and 39 patients, respectively. Over the next 2 y, there was a dramatic increase in pediatric firearm injuries with an increase of 65% (N = 66) in 2020 and 102.5% (N = 81) in 2021. Although there was less of an increase above baseline in 2022, there was still an elevation of 82.5% (N = 73). By the end of 2023, there had been a 145% rise (N = 98) in pediatric firearm injuries above the baseline year of 2018. The mortality rate was 7.6% (N = 30), which is 2.5 times higher than the all-cause trauma mortality of 3.1% at our facility., Conclusions: The number of firearm injuries dramatically increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and these increases have been sustained. Most of the victims have been male, of Black race, and publicly insured. While the state population of Alabama is 26.4% Black race, Black children account for 74.6% of all firearm-injured pediatric patients in our trauma registry. The reason for this disparity is not well-understood. Through ongoing research, we hope to gain insight into the reasons behind pediatric firearm injury and the best ways to mitigate them through both the medical and public health arenas., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Burn injuries are among the top ten leading causes of unintentional death in pediatric patients and are encountered by pediatric surgeons in all practice settings. There is a lack of literature evaluating mortality in pediatric burn injuries in regard to nonaccidental burns and potential disparities. Our study aims to determine the risk factors associated with mortality in pediatric burn injuries and highlight the characteristics of this patient population., Methods: We utilized the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2019 to identify primary burn injuries in children ≤14 y old. Physical abuse descriptors were used to identify patients with suspected nonaccidental injuries. Further demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, and insurance type, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were generated and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to evaluate risk factors for mortality., Results: 13,472 pediatric burn patients (≤14 y old) were identified. The overall mortality was low (<1%). Children with burns to multiple body regions had the highest independent risk of mortality in this cohort. All older age groups had an independent risk of mortality compared to the youngest patients, but those from ages 5 to <10 y old had the highest risk of mortality (OR = 11.40; 95% confidence interval: 4.41-29.43, P < 0.001). Black children had a significantly higher mortality compared to White children. Nonaccidental burns carried a mortality that was twice that of accidental burns. Government insurance type was the primary insurance type for a majority of patients who died., Conclusions: Risk factors for mortality in pediatric burn include Black race, multiple affected body regions, and nonaccidental burns. This study identified an increased mortality risk in the older age groups in contrast to previous studies that showed increased mortality in younger patients suffering from burn injuries., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Intestinal atresia is a common cause of neonatal bowel obstruction. Atresias are often associated with other congenital anomalies. The purpose of the study was to evaluate associated anomalies, operative management, and postoperative outcomes of infants with intestinal atresia., Methods: A review of patients presenting to a single free-standing children's hospital from March 2012 through February 2022 was performed. The variables examined were type of atresia, additional congenital anomalies, type of operative intervention, and postoperative outcomes. Standard statistical methods were utilized., Results: A total of 75 patients with intestinal atresia were identified and several of these patients had multiple atresias. Isolated duodenal atresia patients were the most common (49.3%), followed by jejunal (32%) and ileal (12%). Mixed atresias were rare at 4%, with isolated pyloric and colonic also rare at 1.3% each. Malrotation was associated with 13% of patients and equally associated with duodenal and jejunoileal atresias. A low percentage (3%) of intestinal atresias was seen in conjunction with gastroschisis and concomitant malrotation. A majority of infants with duodenal atresia underwent standard duodenoduodenostomy (19% laparoscopic, 81% open). In infants with jejunoileal atresia, most underwent resection with primary anastomosis. A tapering enteroplasty was performed primarily in 13% of atresias. There were no significant differences noted in time to first feed or length of stay between those with and without tapering enteroplasty. Eleven percent of patients required subsequent intervention for stricture or small bowel obstruction. There was one death in this series., Conclusions: Consistent with other literature, duodenal atresia was the most common type of intestinal atresia. However, we demonstrated that malrotation was equally associated with duodenal and jejunoileal atresias while prior reports had shown a higher association with duodenal atresia. In our patient population, the use of tapering enteroplasty did not appear to be associated with outcomes. Overall, these infants have a low morbidity and mortality rate with a rare need for reoperation., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)