Search

Objective: To assess quality of life (QOL) in patients who developed lower-extremity lymphedema (LLE) after radical gynecologic cancer surgery on prospective clinical trial GOG 244., Methods: The prospective, national, cooperative group trial GOG-0244 determined the incidence of LLE and risk factors for LLE development, as well as associated impacts on QOL, in newly diagnosed patients undergoing surgery for endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer from 6/4/2012-11/17/2014. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of QOL (by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT]), body image, sexual and vaginal function, limb function, and cancer distress were recorded at baseline (within 14 days before surgery), and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Assessments of LLE symptoms and disability were completed at the time of lower limb volume measurement. A linear mixed model was applied to examine the association of PROs/QOL with a Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) total score incremental change ≥4 (indicative of increased LLE symptoms) from baseline, a formal diagnosis of LLE (per the GCLQ), and limb volume change (LVC) ≥10%., Results: In 768 evaluable patients, those with a GCLQ score change ≥4 from baseline had significantly worse QOL (p < 0.001), body image (p < 0.001), sexual and vaginal function (p < 0.001), limb function (p < 0.001), and cancer distress (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sexual activity rates between those with and without LLE symptoms., Conclusions: LLE is significantly detrimental to QOL, daily function, and body image. Clinical intervention trials to prevent and manage this chronic condition after gynecologic cancer surgery are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Carter, Helen Huang, Dr. Carlson, Dr. Lockwood, Dr. Wenzel, Mr. Kauderer, Dr. Hutson, Dr. Walker, Dr. Fleury, Dr. Bonebrake, Dr. Soper, Dr. Mathews, Dr. Zivanovic, Dr. Richards, Dr. Tan, Dr. Alberts, Dr. Barakat and Dr. Wenzel report no conflicts of interest. Dr. Armer reports grant funding received from the NCI LEG study to their institution. Dr. Nolte reports salary support to institution from NCI R01CA162139 grant., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for lymphedema associated with surgery for gynecologic malignancies on GOG study 244., Methods: Women undergoing a lymph node dissection for endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer were eligible for enrollment. Leg volume was calculated from measurements at 10-cm intervals starting 10 cm above the bottom of the heel to the inguinal crease. Measurements were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at 4-6 weeks, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24- months. Lymphedema was defined as a limb volume change (LVC) ≥10% from baseline and categorized as mild: 10-19% LVC; moderate: 20-40% LVC; or severe: >40% LVC. Risk factors associated with lymphedema were also analyzed., Results: Of 1054 women enrolled on study, 140 were inevaluable due to inadequate measurements or eligibility criteria. This left 734 endometrial, 138 cervical, and 42 vulvar patients evaluable for LVC assessment. Median age was 61 years (range, 28-91) in the endometrial, 44 years (range, 25-83) in the cervical, and 58 years (range, 35-88) in the vulvar group. The incidence of LVC ≥10% was 34% (n = 247), 35% (n = 48), and 43% (n = 18), respectively. The peak incidence of lymphedema was at the 4-6 week assessment. Logistic regression analysis showed a decreased risk with advanced age (p = 0.0467). An exploratory analysis in the endometrial cohort showed an increased risk with a node count >8 (p = 0.033)., Conclusions: For a gynecologic cancer, LVC decreased with age greater than 65, but increased with a lymph node count greater than 8 in the endometrial cohort. There was no association with radiation or other risk factors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Alan Hutson received grant funding from NRG SDMC. Dr. Jeanne Carter received grant funding from grant RO1 as a co-investigator. Dr. Jane Armer received grant funding from NCI LEG study. Dr. Suzy Lockwood received grant funding from NIH ROICA 162139. Dr. Susan Nolte grant funding from NCI ROICA162139, salary support to institution, payments for patient accrual from GOG and NRG Oncology to institution. Dr. Robert Stewart received grant funding from NCI LEG study. Dr. Lari Wenzel received grant funding from NRG Oncology. All other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore whether patient-reported lymphedema-related symptoms, as measured by the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ), are associated with a patient-reported diagnosis of lymphedema of the lower extremity (LLE) and limb volume change (LVC) in patients who have undergone radical surgery, including lymphadenectomy, for endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study 244., Methods: Patients completed the baseline and at least one post-surgery GCLQ and LVC assessment. The 20-item GCLQ measures seven symptom clusters-aching, heaviness, infection-related, numbness, physical functioning, general swelling, and limb swelling. LLE was defined as a patient self-reported LLE diagnosis on the GCLQ. LVC was measured by volume calculations based on circumferential measurements. A linear mixed model was fitted for change in symptom cluster scores and GCLQ total score and adjusted for disease sites and assessment time., Results: Of 987 eligible patients, 894 were evaluable (endometrial, 719; cervical, 136; vulvar, 39). Of these, 14% reported an LLE diagnosis (endometrial, 11%; cervical, 18%; vulvar, 38%). Significantly more patients diagnosed versus not diagnosed with LLE reported ≥4-point increase from baseline on the GCLQ total score (p < 0.001). Changes from baseline were significantly larger on all GCLQ symptom cluster scores in patients with LLE compared to those without LLE. An LVC increment of >10% was significantly associated with reported general swelling (p < 0.001), heaviness (p = 0.005), infection-related symptoms (p = 0.002), and physical function (p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Patient-reported symptoms, as measured by the GCLQ, discerned those with and without a patient-reported LLE diagnosis and demonstrated predictive value. The GCLQ combined with LVC may enhance our ability to identify LLE., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Preclinical data suggest elesclomol increases oxidative stress and enhances sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. The objective of this prospective multicenter phase 2 trial was to estimate the activity of IV elesclomol plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer through the frequency of objective tumor responses (ORR)., Methods: Patients with measurable disease, acceptable organ function, performance status ≤ 2, and one prior platinum containing regimen were eligible. A two-stage design was utilized with a target sample size of 22 and 30 subjects, respectively. Prior Gynecologic Oncology Group studies within the same population involving single agent taxanes showed an ORR of approximately (20%) and served as a historical control for direct comparison. The present study was designed to determine if the regimen had an ORR of ≥40% with 90% power., Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 2 received no study treatment and were inevaluable. The median number of cycles was 3 (268 total cycles, range 1-18). The number of patients responding was 11 (19.6%; 90% CI 11.4% to 30.4%) with one complete response. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 3.6 months and 13.3 months, respectively. The median ORR duration was 9.2 months. Percentages of subjects with grade 3 toxicity included: Neutropenia 9%; anemia 5%; metabolic 5%; nausea 4%; infection 4%; neurologic (mostly neuropathy) 4%; and vascular (mostly thromboembolism) 4%. There were no grade 4 toxicities reported., Conclusions: This combination was well tolerated but is unworthy of further investigation based on the proportion responding [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00888615]., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: We sought to determine the level of concordance among surgeons' assessment of residual disease (RD) and pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings among women who underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction for advanced stage ovarian cancer., Methods: This is a post-trial ad hoc analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of bevacizumab in primary and maintenance therapy for patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer following surgical cytoreduction. All subjects underwent imaging of the chest/abdomen/pelvis to establish a post-surgical baseline prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. Information collected on trial was utilized to compare surgeon's operative assessment of RD, to pre-treatment imaging., Results: Of 1873 enrolled patients, surgical outcome was described as optimal (RD≤1cm) in 639 subjects. Twelve patients were excluded as they did not have a baseline, pretreatment imaging, leaving 627 participants for analysis. The average interval from surgery to baseline scan was 26days (range: 1-109). In 251 cases (40%), the post-operative scan was discordant with surgeon assessment, demonstrating RD>1cm in size. RD>1cm was most commonly identified in the right upper quadrant (28.4%), retroperitoneal para-aortic lymph nodes (RD>1.5cm; 28.2%) and the left upper quadrant (10.7%). Patients with RD>1cm on pre-treatment CT (discordant) exhibited a significantly greater risk of disease progression (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08-1.56; p=0.0059)., Conclusions: Among patients reported to have undergone optimal cytoreduction, 40% were found to have lesions >1cm on postoperative, pretreatment imaging. Although inflammatory changes and/or rapid tumor regrowth could account for the discordance, the impact on PFS and distribution of RD may suggest underestimation by the operating surgeon., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify patient and physician factors related to enrollment onto Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials., Methods: Prospective study of women with primary or recurrent cancer of the uterus or cervix treated at a GOG institution from July 2010 to January 2012. Logistic regression examined probability of availability, eligibility and enrollment in a GOG trial. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for significant (p<0.05) results reported., Results: Sixty institutions, 781 patients, and 150 physicians participated, 300/780 (38%) had a trial available, 290/300 had known participation status. Of these, 150 women enrolled (59.5%), 102 eligible did not enroll (35%), 38 (13%) were ineligible. Ethnicity and specialty of physician, practice type, data management availability, and patient age were significantly associated with trial availability. Patients with >4 comorbidities (OR 4.5; CI 1.7-11.8) had higher odds of trial ineligibility. Non-White patients (OR 7.9; CI 1.3-46.2) and patients of Black physicians had greater odds of enrolling (OR 56.5; CI 1.1-999.9) in a therapeutic trial. Significant patient therapeutic trial enrollment factors: belief trial may help (OR 76.9; CI 4.9->1000), concern about care if not on trial (OR12.1; CI 2.1-71.4), pressure to enroll (OR .27; CI 0.12-.64), caregiving without pay (OR 0.13; CI .02-.84). Significant physician beliefs were: patients would not do well on standard therapy (OR 3.6; CI 1.6-8.4), and trial would not be time consuming (OR 3.3; CI 1.3-8.1)., Conclusions: Trial availability, patient and physician beliefs were factors identified that if modified could improve enrollment in cancer cooperative group clinical trials., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is based on pathologic diagnosis. About 40% of AEH is found to be carcinoma at surgery. This study's objective is to derive an objective characterization of nuclei from cases diagnosed as AEH or superficially invasive endometrial cancer (SIEC)., Methods: Cases from GOG study 167A were classified by a central pathology committee as AEH (n=39) or SIEC (n=39). High resolution digitized images of cell nuclei were recorded. Features of the nuclear chromatin pattern were computed. Classification rules were derived by discriminant analysis., Results: Nuclei from cases of AEH and SIEC occupy the same range on a progression curve for endometrial lesions. Cases of AEH and SIEC both comprise nuclei of two phenotypes: hyperplastic characteristics and premalignant/neoplastic characteristics. The principal difference between AEH and SIEC is the percentage of premalignant/neoplastic nuclei. When this percentage approaches 50-60% superficial invasion is likely. SIEC may develop already from lesions at the low end of the progression curve., Conclusions: AEH comprises cases which may constitute a low risk group involving <40% of AEH cases. These cases hold a percentage of <20% of nuclei of a preneoplastic phenotype. AEH cases from the central and high end of progression have >40% of nuclei of preneoplastic phenotype. Nuclei of the preneoplastic phenotype in AEH lesions are almost indistinguishable from nuclei in SIEC, where this percentage exceeds 60%. The percentage of nuclei of the preneoplastic phenotype in AEH esions might serve as criterion for assessment of risk for the development of invasive disease., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate VH fibrin sealant's influence on lower extremity lymphedema after inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients., Methods: Patients undergoing an inguinal lymphadenectomy during the management of vulvar malignancy were randomized to receive sutured closure (SC) vs VH fibrin sealant sprayed into the groin followed by sutured closure (FS). Leg measurements were taken preoperatively and during postoperative encounters when surgical outcomes were assessed. Grade 2 or 3 lymphedema was defined as circumferential measurement increases of 3-5 cm and >5 cm, respectively., Results: 150 patients were enrolled. 137 patients were evaluable for lymphedema analysis with 67 and 70 patients in the SC arm and FS arm, respectively. The incidence of grade 2 and 3 lymphedema was 67%(45/67) in the SC arm, and 60% (42/70) FS arm (p=0.4779). The incidence of lymphedema was strongly associated with inguinal infection (p=0.0165). Lymphedema was not statistically increased in those who received adjuvant radiation. 139 patients remained evaluable for a descriptive analysis of their surgical complications. The overall incidence of complications was 61%(43/70) and 59% (41/69) for SC and FS arms, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of drains, drain output or incidence of inguinal infections, wound breakdowns or seromas. There was an increased incidence of vulvar infections in the FS arm (23/69) vs (10/70) (p=0.0098). The utilization of a Blake drain was associated with an increase in vulvar (p=0.0157) and inguinal wound breakdown (p=0.0456)., Conclusion: VH fibrin sealant in inguinal lymphadenectomies does not reduce leg lymphedema and may increase the risk for complications in the vulvar wound.

Objectives: To determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with completely resected stage I or II carcinosarcoma of the uterus treated with adjuvant ifosfamide and cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity of this regimen., Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed carcinosarcoma (mixed mesodermal tumor) and no postoperative radiotherapy following complete resection for clinical stage I or II disease. They were to have adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic functions and performance status of 2 or less. Study entry was to be within 8 weeks of hysterectomy. Patients with previous chemotherapy, or other noncutaneous malignancies, were ineligible. Ifosfamide was administered 1.5 g/m2 intravenously (IV) over 1 h and cisplatin was given 20 mg/m(2) over 15 min followed by mesna 120 mg/m2 IV bolus, then 1.5 g/m2/24 h as a continuous infusion. Initial doses (daily x 5 every 21 days x 3 cycles) were reduced by 20% (to 4 days) for myelotoxicity., Results: Nine of seventy-six patients enrolled were deemed ineligible and another two who did not receive protocol treatment were inevaluable. Of the 65 evaluable patients, median age was 65 years; 50 patients (77%) were stage I and 15 (23%) were stage II. PFS and OS, respectively, were 69% and 82% at 24 months, and 54% and 52% at 84 months. Overall 5-year survival was 62%. Leukopenia was the most commonly reported, but manageable, toxicity., Conclusion: Adjuvant ifosfamide and cisplatin after primary surgery for stage I or II carcinosarcoma of the uterus is tolerable. In the absence of concurrent controls, the impact on PFS and OS is unclear. Pelvic relapse remains problematic.

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide in patients with completely resected stage IB-III dysgerminoma., Methods: Eligible patients were treated with three courses of carboplatin 400 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus etoposide 120 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2, and 3 every 4 weeks for three courses., Results: Forty-two patients were entered on this trial, of whom 39 were eligible. No patient suffered a recurrence of dysgerminoma, but one patient ultimately died of lung adenocarcinoma. One patient was excluded on pathology review (elements of endodermal sinus tumor were present) developed recurrent tumor and died despite further therapy. As expected, the regimen was well tolerated. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 7.8 years (range: 2.86 months to 10.92 years)., Conclusion: The regimen used in this study is an alternative to cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) for selected patients for whom minimizing toxicity (particularly neuropathy) is critical or for whom reduction in the number of treatment days is important.

Objective: To assess the frequency with which patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are enrolled in prospective Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) treatment studies and to assess whether enrollment is influenced by patient age or other factors., Methods: The study was open to patients with primary, previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer referred to member institutions. Eligible patients provided written informed consent to have demographic and medical records data submitted to the protocol database for analysis. Pathologic diagnosis was confirmed by central review. Demographic and clinical data, including coexisting medical conditions, tumor stage, grade, and histology, surgical procedures, planned postoperative therapy, and reason/s (if applicable) a patient was not treated per GOG protocol, were collected., Results: Nine hundred and forty-eight patients were initially eligible. Subsequently, 137 (15%) patients were excluded based on pathology (low malignant potential tumors), as were 10 whose invasive disease was unstaged. Among 801 eligible patients, 36% were > or =65 years of age, 52% had papillary serous tumors, and 73% had stage III/IV disease. In patients aged <65 years, 67% were stage III/IV compared to 82% of patients > or =65 years of age. The mean age was 5.5 years greater for patients with stage III/IV versus stage I/II disease. Compared to their younger counterparts, older patients with stage III/IV disease were less likely to enter into a GOG treatment protocol. Most common reasons were patient ineligibility (33%), refusal (29%), and investigator decision (20%)., Conclusion: Age appears to be an important factor influencing treatment selection among patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer. In addition to reviewing eligibility criteria, practitioners' attitudes should be monitored to assure that elderly patients are not inappropriately denied participation in GOG clinical trials.