1. Hormonal biomarkers remain prognostically relevant within the molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer.
- Author
-
Vrede SW, Van Weelden WJ, Bulten J, Gilks CB, Teerenstra S, Huvila J, Matias-Guiu X, Gil-Moreno A, Asberger J, Sweegers S, van der Putten LJM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Reijnen C, Colas E, Hausnerová J, Weinberger V, Snijders MPLM, Vinklerova P, Ravaggi A, Odicino F, Bignotti E, McAlpine JN, Kruitwagen R, and Pijnenborg JMA
- Abstract
Objective: The prognostic relevance of hormonal biomarkers in endometrial cancer (EC) has been well-established. A refined three-tiered risk model for estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) expression was shown to improve prognostication. This has not been evaluated in relation to the molecular subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate the ER/PR expression within the molecular subgroups in EC., Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed and data from the European Network for Individualized Treatment centers and Vancouver, Canada were used. ER/PR immunohistochemical expression was grouped as: ER/PR 0-10 %, 20-80 % or 90-100 %. Molecular subgroups were determined with full next-generation sequencing or combined with immunohistochemistry: POLEmut, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53mut and no-specific molecular profile (NSMP)., Results: A total of 739 patients were included (median follow-up 5.0 years). Tumors were classified as POLEmut in 9.1 %(N = 67), MMRd in 27.6 %(N = 204), p53mut in 20.8 %(N = 154) and NSMP in 42.5 %(N = 314). Among all molecular subgroups, patients with ER/PR 90-100 % expression revealed the best disease-specific survival (DSS). Within p53mut, PR 90-100 % expression showed a 5-year DSS of 100.0 %. ER expression is prognostic more relevant in MMRd and NSMP tumors while PR expression in p53mut and NSMP tumors. Across all molecular subgroups, PR 0-10 %, p53mut, lympho-vascular space invasion and FIGO stage III-IV remained independently prognostic for reduced DSS Whereas PR 90-100 % and POLEmut remained independently prognostic for improved DSS., Conclusion: We demonstrated that ER/PR expression remain prognostically relevant within the molecular subgroups, and that a three-tiered cutoff refines prognostication. These data support incorporating routine evaluation of ER/PR expression in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF