Search

Memantine is a non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that has been approved for the treatment of the cognitive deficits noted in Alzheimer's disease. While there is a body of research that supports memantine's facilitative action upon memory compromise, this series of studies aimed to investigate the effects of this drug in healthy animals with intact memory functioning. A 0.1 mM dose of memantine injected immediately after a weakly aversive training event (i.e. 20% v/v methyl anthranilate) was found to enhance passive avoidance learning for this event in day-old chicks up to 24 h following training. The same dose of memantine was also observed to enhance memory for the training event when it was administered in conjunction with a reminder trial. These results suggest that memantine is capable of facilitating both memory consolidation as well as memory reconsolidation. It was concluded that memantine's mechanism may involve the short-term or intermediate memory phases of the Gibbs and Ng model of memory, and that the current findings represent enhancement of intact memory, rather than amelioration of memory compromise., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This series of experiments examined the involvement of the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390, on memory reconsolidation following reminder-activated retrieval. Day-old male New HampshirexWhite Leghorn chicks were trained on a single trial passive avoidance task. A dose of 0.5 mg/kg of SCH23390 was administered subcutaneously 5 min before reminder trials, which were presented at 30, 60, and 90 min following training. Memory deficits were observed when reminder trials were presented at 30 and 60 min following training, but not when a reminder was presented at 90 min. No effect on memory retention was observed when reminder trials were not presented, suggesting that reconsolidation mechanisms were both contingent on the presentation of the reminder and independent of the consolidation process. Following a reminder presented at 60 min post-training, deficits in memory retention emerged between 45 and 60 min. The deficit was prolonged, lasting for up until 48 h after reminder presentation. The results indicate an important role for the D1 receptor in reconsolidation processes.

The single-trial passive avoidance task is a useful procedure for examining learning and memory in the young chick. However, it has recently been suggested that discrepant results reported by different laboratories are due to differences in training procedure. The present study investigated a number of parameters surrounding the passive avoidance task, using day-old White Leghorn, Black Australorp cockerels. The results suggested that presentation of a water-dipped bead immediately after the aversive bead significantly altered retention levels. In addition, when the water-dipped bead was presented after the aversive bead, chicks failed to discriminate between beads for a period of 10 min following exposure to the aversant experience. A novel variant of the passive avoidance procedure, involving pretraining with a water-dipped red bead, training with an aversant-coated red bead, and testing with a dry red bead, was evaluated. A measure of avoidance was calculated using all three trials. It is suggested that the use of a single bead, measured both before and after the training experience and using both aversant- and water-trained controls, results in the most concise characterization of memory-related phenomena in the chick which is not contaminated by a carryover effect from the aversive training experience to the nonaversive bead.

The discrepant results noted by the La Trobe/Monash, Sussex, Open, and Berkeley University memory research groups employing the passive avoidance task (PAT) with the chick indicate that some of these differences may be due to differences in training procedures between the various groups. The procedures employed by each group were replicated as closely as possible and compared using the same strain of chick. Higher levels of pecking and lower training latencies were observed in the La Trobe/Monash chicks. Improved training latency was observed following a change in the day of experimentation with Sussex chicks, and in white light in Open chicks. A powerful reinforcing effect was observed when pretraining was conducted with a wet lure across multiple pretraining trials, indicating the importance of this difference between groups. The observed impact on chick performance of these variables indicates that differences between PAT procedures may have important interactive effects with aversive learning. The results of data gathered using different procedures may only be superficially comparable, and further investigation of the effects of these variables is indicated., (Copyright 2001 Academic Press.)

The effect of 2-deoxygalactose (2-D-gal), an inhibitor of glycoprotein synthesis, on memory formation was investigated with the day-old chick trained on a single-trial passive discrimination task. 2-D-gal (10 mumol/chick) was shown to inhibit memory formation at a time before the emergence of an antibiotic-sensitive long-term memory stage. The amnestic effect of 2-D-gal was successfully prevented by galactose, and more significantly by noradrenaline. In contrast, anisomycin-induced amnesia was resistant to challenge by either galactose or noradrenaline. The results are consistent with the view that some glycoprotein involvement in memory formation occurs prior to the formation of protein synthesis-dependent long-term memory, and this role of glycoproteins may be associated with the triggering of long-term memory formation by noradrenaline.