Search

Objective: To describe the quality of life of women at an increased risk of ovarian cancer undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO)., Methods: Patients evaluated in our gynecologic oncology ambulatory practice between January 2018-December 2019 for an increased risk of ovarian cancer were included. Patients received the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PROMIS emotional and instrumental support questionnaires along with a disease-specific measure (PROM). First and last and pre- and post-surgical PROM responses in each group were compared as were PROMs between at-risk patients and patients with other ovarian diseases., Results: 195 patients with an increased risk of ovarian cancer were identified, 155 completed PROMs (79.5%). BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were noted in 52.8%. Also included were 469 patients with benign ovarian disease and 455 with ovarian neoplasms. Seventy-two at-risk patients (46.5%) had surgery and 36 had both pre- and post-operative PROMs. Post-operatively, these patients reported significantly less tension (p = 0.011) and health-related worry (p = 0.021) but also decreased levels of health (p = 0.018) and quality of life <7d (0.001), less interest in sex (p = 0.014) and feeling less physically attractive (p = 0.046). No differences in body image or physical/sexual health were noted in at-risk patients who did not have surgery. When compared to patients with ovarian neoplasms, at-risk patients reported lower levels of disease-related life interference and treatment burden, less worry, and better overall health., Conclusions: In patients with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, RRBSO is associated with decreased health-related worry and tension, increased sexual dysfunction and poorer short-term quality of life. Patients with ovarian neoplasms suffer to a greater extent than at-risk patients and report higher levels of treatment burden and disease-related anxiety., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We assessed preferences for cancer risk management strategies for Lynch syndrome (LS) in LS-affected women., Methods: Women with LS aged ≥25 years evaluated 9 cancer risk management strategies using a visual analog scale (VAS) and modified standard gamble (SG). For the VAS, women ranked each strategy ranging from 0 (least preferred) to 100 (most preferred). VAS scores were calculated by dividing the corresponding number by 100. Scores closer to 1.0 reflected more favorable strategies. For the SG, participants were asked to specify their expected threshold of lifetime risk of endometrial or colorectal cancer, ranging from 0 to 100%, at which they would consider undertaking each strategy. Strategies included chemoprevention, cancer screening, and preventive surgery. Cancer worry and perceived cancer risk measures were collected on a subset of participants., Results: Sixty-one women completed preference assessments. By VAS, annual combined screening was the most preferred, followed by annual screenings and chemoprevention with oral contraceptives. By SG, women were the most willing to endorse oral contraceptives and biannual screening strategies at the lowest threshold of lifetime risk followed by annual screening strategies. Surgical interventions were the least preferred strategies using both VAS and SG. Women with a family history of gynecologic or colorectal cancer were less likely to consider prevention or screening options compared to women without a family history. Cancer worry was higher among women with a positive family history of LS cancer., Conclusion: Understanding women's preferences may facilitate optimal use and adherence to cancer risk management strategies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the presence or absence of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in tumor samples is a quick and relatively inexpensive method to screen for Lynch syndrome (LS). At our institution we have found that >20% of patients lack expression of MMR proteins and >10% would be expected to benefit from genetic counseling (GC). However, compliance with referral to GC is poor. Therefore, we set out to analyze the reasons for noncompliance, hypothesizing that it could be due to a perception of a low risk for developing other cancers., Methods: All patients with endometrial cancer between 2007 and 2009 were identified. Patients with absence of MMR protein expression who would be expected to benefit from GC were identified. These patients were sent a questionnaire assessing the utilization of GC services as well as their perception of LS and Lynch-associated cancers., Results: Forty-seven patients out of 384 were identified who would have been expected to benefit from GC. Of the responders, 20 patients (77%) reported that they were referred by their physician for GC, of which 9 saw a genetic counselor, 8 had genetic testing, and 3 mutations were detected. The primary reason for not seeing a genetic counselor was no insurance coverage/cost of the visit followed by anxiety for the results. Nine patients stated that the patient/family did not want to know information regarding cancer risk. As compared to the general population 35% thought their risk of having LS was higher, 12% thought it was the same, 15% lower, and 38% was unsure. Forty-six percent of patients thought the risk of colon cancer was higher than background risk, and 26% thought it was the same., Conclusion: Most patients underestimate their risk of LS associated heritable cancer. Physicians should pay more attention to family history and IHC in order to refer patients appropriately. In addition, more verbal and written information may enable patients to accurately assess their cancer risk. This could further improve compliance with genetic counseling and detection of Lynch syndrome., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)