Search

Extant African papioninans are distinguished from macaques by the presence of excavated facial fossae; however, facial excavation differs among taxa. Mangabeys (Cercocebus, Rungwecebus, and Lophocebus) exhibit fossae that invade the zygomatic forming pronounced suborbital fossae (SOFs). Larger-bodied Papio, Mandrillus, and Theropithecus have lateral rostral fossae with minimal/absent suborbital fossae. Because prior studies have shown that mangabeys exhibit adaptations to anterior dental loading (e.g., palatal retraction), it is plausible that mangabey SOFs represent structural accommodation to masticatory-system shape rather than facial allometry, as commonly hypothesized. We analyzed covariation between zygomaxillary-surface shape, masticatory-system shape, and facial size in 141 adult crania of Macaca fascicularis, Papio kindae, Cercocebus, and Lophocebus. These taxa represent the range of papionin SOF expression while minimizing size variation (narrow allometry). Masticatory-system landmarks (39) registered palate shape, bite points, masticatory muscle attachments, and the temporomandibular joint. Semilandmarks (450) captured zygomaxillary-surface shape. Following Procrustes superimposition with semilandmark sliding and principal components analyses, multivariate regression was used to explore allometry, and two-block partial least-squares analyses (within-configuration and separate-blocks) were used to examine covariation patterns. Scores on principal components 1-2 and the first partial least-square (PLS1) separate mangabeys from Macaca and Papio. Both zygomaxillary-surface shape and masticatory-system shape are correlated with size within taxa and facial morphotypes; however, regression distributions indicate morphotype shape differences are non-allometric. PLS1 accounts for ∼95% of shape covariance (p < 0.0001) and shows strong linear correlations (r-PLS = ∼0.95, p < 0.0001) between blocks. Negative PLS1 scores in mangabeys reflect deep excavation of the suborbital malar surface, palatal retraction, and anterior displacement of jaw adductor muscles and the temporomandibular joint. Neither PC1 nor PLS1 scores ordinate specimens by facial size. Taken together, these results fail to support the allometric hypothesis but suggest that mangabey zygomaxillary morphology is closely linked with adaptations to hard-object feeding., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We report here on evidence of early Homo around 1.0 Ma (millions of years ago) in the central plains of southern Africa. The human material, a first upper molar, was discovered during the systematic excavation of a densely-packed bone bed in the basal part of the sedimentary sequence at the Cornelia-Uitzoek fossil vertebrate locality. We dated this sequence by palaeomagnetism and correlated the bone bed to the Jaramillo subchron, between 1.07 and 0.99 Ma. This makes the specimen the oldest southern African hominine remains outside the dolomitic karst landscapes of northern South Africa. Cornelia-Uitzoek is the type locality of the Cornelian Land Mammal Age. The fauna contains an archaic component, reflecting previous biogeographic links with East Africa, and a derived component, suggesting incipient southern endemism. The bone bed is considered to be the result of the bone collecting behaviour of a large predator, possibly spotted hyaenas. Acheulian artefacts are found in small numbers within the bone bed among the fossil vertebrates, reflecting the penecontemporaneous presence of people in the immediate vicinity of the occurrence. The hominine tooth was recovered from the central, deeper part of the bone bed. In size, it clusters with southern African early Homo and it is also morphologically similar. We propose that the early Homo specimen forms part of an archaic component in the fauna, in parallel with the other archaic faunal elements at Uitzoek. This supports an emergent pattern of archaic survivors in the southern landscape at this time, but also demonstrates the presence of early Homo in the central plains of southern Africa, beyond the dolomitic karst areas., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Speleological, paleomagnetic, mineral magnetic, and biochronological analyses have been undertaken at the Gondolin hominin-bearing paleocave, North West Province, South Africa. Two fossiliferous but stratigraphically separate sequences, GD2 and GD1/3, which were once part of a large cavern system, have been identified. Although some comparative paleomagnetic samples were taken from the GD 1, 3, and 4 localities that are currently under investigation, the research presented here focuses on the fossil-rich, in situ deposits at locality GD 2, excavated by E.S. Vrba in 1979. The GD 2 deposits are dominated by normal-polarity calcified clastic deposits that are sandwiched between clastic-free flowstone speleothems. The lower flowstone has a sharp contact with the red siltstone deposits and is of reversed polarity. The capping flowstone shows a change from normal to reversed polarity, thereby preserving a polarity reversal. While the paleomagnetic work indicates that the GD 2 fossil material was deposited during a normal-polarity period, the shortness of the sequence made matching of the magnetostratigraphy to the geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS) impossible without the aid of biochronology. While lacking multiple time-sensitive taxa, the recovery of specimens attributable to Stage III Metridiochoerus andrewsi is consistent with a deposition date between 1.9 and 1.5 Ma. A comparison of the magnetostratigraphy with the GPTS therefore suggests that the fauna-bearing siltstone of GD 2 date to the Olduvai normal-polarity event, which occurred between 1.95 and 1.78 Ma, and that the reversal from normal to reversed polarity identified in the capping flowstone dates to 1.78 Ma. The main faunal layers therefore date to slightly older than 1.78 Ma. Deposits from the GD 1 locality are dominated by reversed directions of magnetization, which show that this deposit is not of the same age as the faunal layers from the GD 2 locality.