Search

Raziskava metodološko in vsebinsko povezuje v novo sinergijo spoznanja iz dialektične teorije sistemov, poslovne kibernetike in strateškega managementa saj z med-strokovnim ustvarjalnim sodelovanjem lahko ustvarimo miselne konstrukte, ki tvorijo v sinergiji novost, ki je ni moč reducirati zgolj na eno izmed navedenih področij znanosti. S to sinergijo smo iskali odgovore na vprašanja regionalnega razvoja, ker jih z utečenimi geografsko-ekonomskimi instrumenti ni moč razviti, saj le-ti niso zadostno celoviti. Posegli smo tudi na področje pokrajinizacije, kjer politična ekonomija prav tako nima zadostno celovitih odgovorov na vprašanje – koliko in kakšne pokrajine naj npr. Slovenija vzpostavi, če sploh. Obstoječa gradiva o tem nakazujejo osnovno problematiko, ki (kot vidimo) onemogoča vzpostavitev pokrajin, predvsem zaradi ukvarjanja z zatečenim stanjem, tj. delitvijo pristojnosti med državo – regijo – lokalnimi skupnostmi. Potreben je odmik od ustaljene politične in ekonomske teorije opredeljevanja in razumevanja pokrajin k sinergiji, za katero so nam služile navedene tri znanosti, da smo raziskovali in predlagali model regije – organizacije, ki bo sposobna preživeti na daljši rok v zapletenih razmerah. Bo torej viabilna, ker povezuje v novo sinergijo spoznanja iz njih v praksi z ustvarjalnim interdisciplinarnim sodelovanjem občanov regije in njihovih partnerjev od drugod. Takšna regija ima izoblikovano identiteto, opredeljeno z namenom, ki se izkristalizira v procesu sodelovanja regionalnih prebivalcev. Regionalna identiteta ni tavtološka in je ne zmorejo določiti državni uradniki, saj nastaja v nenehni interakciji in se, ob upoštevanju zadostne in potrebne celovitosti in raznolikosti, nenehno spreminja v novo danost. Regionalizacija je proces, tako samega oblikovanja regije kot njenega nenehnega spreminjanja, da bi se izognila entropiji. Sodobna IKT omogoča sodelovanje velikega števila prebivalcev, vsaj tistih, ki so računalniško pismeni, zato odločitve niso posledica vehementnosti oblastnikov, niti državnih niti regionalnih, temveč proces nenehnega tehtanja in izbire v njem lahko uporabimo metode medsebojnega interdisciplinarnega ustvarjalnega sodelovanja, npr. USOMID in TS. Namen regije, ki naj bo viabilna, je, da ustvarja pogoje viabilnosti osnovnih elementov, tj. posameznikov, ki so rekurzivni in iterirajoči elementi njene kohezivnosti. Prebivalci potrebujejo za svojo viabilnost, in sicer zaradi fizičnih omejitev eksistence, vodo, hrano, zrak in ne nazadnje avtonomijo oziroma svobodo izbire, ob predpostavki, da so sposobni razlikovati in se odločati. Razvoj, prilagajanje in samoučenje v primeru človeške – lahko jo imenujemo tudi regionalne – populacije, nikoli ne poteka neodvisno, izolirano, hermetično zaprto. Regija kot mreža medsebojno soodvisnih prebivalcev ni namenjena diktiranju posameznikove sreče ali dobrega počutja, temveč zagotavljanju osnovnih bivanjskih pogojev, na podlagi katerih lahko posameznik določa lastno identiteto oziroma namen, ki ga v življenju zasleduje in ga posledično kot del subjektivne realnosti tudi nenehno izračunava. Namesto regionalnega (birokratsko-delegatskega) aparata zato predlagamo zgolj izmed prebivalcev (v skladu s strokovnimi merili in sposobnostjo) izbrane managerje, ki so usmerjevalci regionalnih procesov, njihovi spremljevalci (v skladu z opredeljenimi razvojnimi kazalniki). V regionalni mreži odločajo prebivalci, model je participativen in hkrati takšen, da izkazuje dvojno povratno zanko (cilj je seveda negativna povratna zanka, ki stabilizira, razen ko si v skupnosti zaželimo revolucionarnih sprememb), znotraj viabilnega posameznika in njegove interakcije z okoljem. Načela njihovega sodelovanja in povezovanja, če naj bo le-to vzdržno na dolgi rok, morajo temeljiti na družbeni odgovornosti. Družbena odgovornost pomeni osebno odgovornost do družbe, ki se vedno kaže skozi posameznikove odločitve z zavezo spoštovati trajnostni razvoj in VKEN. The present research, both in terms of methods and content, links into a new synergy the knowledge of the Dialectical Systems Theory, Business Cybernetics and Strategic Management, backed by the Viable Systems Model only in interdisciplinary creative cooperation the mental constructs can be generated as a synergetic novelty - not reducible to any of the mentioned sciences alone. These were the basis to the quest for a regional development for which the answers are not feasible with the established geographic and economic instruments since they are not requisitely holistic. The regionalisation for which the political economy has no requisitely holistic answers – how many and what kind of regions Slovenia should establish if any, is part of the research. The existing regionalisation materials of Slovenia reveal the basic problems that hinder the establishment of regions, mostly due to the coping with the existing situation, notably the division of powers between the state – region – local community. Distancing from the established political and economic theory of defining and understanding the regions enables the new synergy, for which the previous mentioned three scientific areas are used. Our research was focused on the novel model of the region as an organisation capable of long-term survival in complicated and complex conditions. The identity of such a region is defined by the purpose that results from cooperation of regional inhabitants. Regional identity is not tautological and cannot be defined by the state clerks or officials it is created in the constant interaction of its people to make the new reality in line with their holistic requirements, therefore requisitely holistic. Regionalisation is the process of creating and constant changing the region so that its entropy is avoided. The modern ICT enables the cooperation of many inhabitants, at least the computer literate ones therefore the decisions are no acts of the vehement rulers, neither the state nor the regional ones, but of the process of constant consideration and selection in which the methods of interdisciplinary creative cooperation, e.g. USOMID or TS are used to make a viable region creating its framework conditions in which its constitutive elements - its inhabitants become viable. They are recursive and iterrary elements of their regional cohesiveness. The viability of inhabitants, due to the physical existence requirements, is conditioned with water, food, air and their autonomy - their freedom to choose, provided they could distinguish and decide. Development, alignment and self-learning in the case of humanity – including the regional population, are never independent, isolated or hermetically closed. The purpose of the region as a network of regional inhabitants is not to dictate the personal happiness or well-being, but to ensure the basic existential conditions in which the individuals can define their identity, their life’s purposes that are, as parts of subjective reality, constantly computed. Instead of a regional (burocratic - delegational) apparatus the management team is proposed that is selected from and by the inhabitants (according to their knowing and capabilities) to steer and monitor the regional processes (vis a vis development index). In their regional network the inhabitants decide their model is participative and reveals the double feedback loop (one targets the negative feedback loop that stabilises, except when evolutionary changes are required). It includes the viable individuals and their interactions with their environment. The principles of their cooperation are based on the social responsibility that is foremost personal responsibility to the society and revealed through the decisions of individuals towards the sustainable development and value-culture-ethic-norms of social responsibility.