Search

Anterior and posterior drooling are prevalent comorbidities in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Considering the heterogeneity of the patient population and the multifactorial aetiology of drooling, an interdisciplinary and individualised treatment approach is indispensable. However, no tool for stepwise decision-making in the treatment of paediatric drooling has been developed previously. Within the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, care for children with anterior and/or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities is coordinated by a saliva control team with healthcare professionals from six disciplines. In alignment with international literature, published guidelines, and evidence gained from two decades of experience and research by our team, this paper proposes an algorithm reflecting the assessment and treatment approach applied in our clinic. First, directions are provided to decide on the necessity of saliva control treatment, taking type of drooling, the child's age, and the severity and impact of drooling into account. Second, the algorithm offers guidance on the choice between available treatment options, highlighting the importance of accounting for child characteristics and child and caregiver preferences in clinical (shared) decision-making., Conclusions: With this algorithm, we aim to emphasise the importance of repeated stepwise decision-making in the assessment and treatment of drooling in children during their childhood, encouraging healthcare professionals to apply a holistic approach., What Is Known: • Children with anterior or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities comprise a heterogeneous group, necessitating an individualised treatment approach. • No stepwise decision-making tool is available for the treatment of paediatric drooling., What Is New: • Deciding on the necessity of saliva control treatment should be a conscious process, based on type of drooling, age, and drooling severity and impact. • Type of drooling, age, cognition, oral motor skills, self-awareness, posture, diagnosis, and child/caregiver preferences need to be considered to decide on the optimal treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To develop robust multivariable prediction models for non-response to (1) submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections and (2) concurrent submandibular and parotid (four-gland) injections, to guide treatment decisions for drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, including cerebral palsy., Method: This was a retrospective cohort study including 262 children (155 males/107 females, median age 7 years 11 months [IQR 5 years 1 month], range 4 years 0 months - 17 years 11 months) receiving submandibular injections and 74 children (52 males/22 females, median age 7 years 7 months [IQR 4 years 3 months], range 4 years 9 months - 18 years 8 months) receiving four-gland injections. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate associations between candidate predictors and non-response 8 weeks after injection., Results: Ninety-six children (37%) were non-responders to submandibular injections, for which developmental age was the strongest predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.45 for developmental age <4 years or 4-6 years with IQ <70). Other characteristics that showed a trend towards an increased risk of non-response were diagnosis, sex, and head position. Thirty-four children (46%) were non-responders to four-gland injections, for which tongue protrusion (aOR 3.10; 95% CI 1.14-8.43) seemed most predictive, whereas multiple preceding submandibular injections (aOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-1.16) showed a trend towards being protective. Predictors were, however, unstable across different definitions of non-response and both models (i.e. submandibular and four-gland) had insufficient discriminative ability., Interpretation: Potential predictors of non-response to BoNT-A injections were identified. Nevertheless, the developed prediction models seemed inadequate for guidance of treatment decisions., What This Paper Adds: Developmental age seemed most predictive of non-response to submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A injections. Non-response to concurrent submandibular and parotid injections was best predicted by tongue protrusion and number of previous injections. Multivariable prediction models including these clinical characteristics were unable to discriminate well. Predictors differed when non-response was defined using alternative outcome measures., (© 2023 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.)

Background: Despite the established efficacy of glycopyrronium bromide in reducing drooling among children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, evidence on its impact on the daily lives of children and parents and effectiveness in a real-world setting are scarce, especially among long-term users. This study explored timing and duration of glycopyrronium treatment, effect and impact on daily life, and occurrence of side effects to inform clinical practice., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a national referral centre for drooling, including 61 children with nonprogressive neurodevelopmental disabilities, treated with glycopyrronium for anterior and/or posterior drooling between 2011 and 2021. Data were obtained from medical records and supplemented by structured telephone interviews with parents., Results: Anterior drooling severity decreased in 82% of the included children. Changes in the impact of drooling on burden of care, social interaction, and self-esteem were reported in 55%, 31%, and 36%, respectively. Side effects were noted for 71% of cases, yet only 36% of parents deemed these as outweighing the positive impact of treatment. A substantial majority (77%) of the included children were long-term users (≥6 months). Among these, 38% of parents reported decreasing effectiveness and 27% noticed more prominent side effects over time., Conclusions: Glycopyrronium demonstrated potential in mitigating the impact of drooling on daily life, although variations were observed in the specific aspects and extent of improvement. The real-world context of our study provides important insights for refining clinical practices, emphasizing the need for balanced consideration of treatment benefits and potential side effects to facilitate shared decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Karen van Hulst and Corrie Erasmus have received a consulting fee from Eurocept Pharmaceuticals. Corrie Erasmus has received an unrestricted research grant from Proveca Ltd. All funding was paid to their institution and embedded in a research foundation; they received no personal financial payment. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Paediatric Neurology Society.)

Paediatric anterior drooling has a major impact on the daily lives of children and caregivers. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections are considered an effective treatment to diminish drooling. However, there is no international consensus on which major salivary glands should be injected to obtain optimal treatment effect while minimizing the risk of side effects. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence for submandibular BoNT-A injections and concurrent submandibular and parotid (i.e. four-gland) injections, respectively, and assess whether outcomes could be compared across studies to improve decision making regarding the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment approach for paediatric anterior drooling. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies (until October 1, 2023) on submandibular or four-gland BoNT-A injections for the treatment of anterior drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Similarities and differences in treatment, patient, outcome, and follow-up characteristics were assessed. Twenty-eight papers were identified; 7 reporting on submandibular injections and 21 on four-gland injections. No major differences in treatment procedures or timing of follow-up were found. However, patient characteristics were poorly reported, there was great variety in outcome measurement, and the assessment of side effects was not clearly described.   Conclusion: This review highlights heterogeneity in outcome measures and patient population descriptors among studies on paediatric BoNT-A injections, limiting the ability to compare treatment effectiveness between submandibular and four-gland injections. These findings emphasize the need for more extensive and uniform reporting of patient characteristics and the implementation of a core outcome measurement set to allow for comparison of results between studies and facilitate the optimization of clinical practice guidelines. What is Known: • There is no international consensus on which salivary glands to initially inject with BoNT-A to treat paediatric drooling. What is New: • Concluding on the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment based on literature is currently infeasible. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures used to quantify anterior drooling.and clinical characteristics of children treated with intraglandular BoNT-A are generally insufficiently reported. • Consensus-based sets of outcome measures and patient characteristics should be developed and implemented., (© 2023. The Author(s).)