Search

In this systematic review, we report on the effects of diuretic deprescribing compared to continued diuretic use. We included clinical studies reporting on outcomes such as mortality, heart failure recurrence, tolerability and feasibility. We assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework. We included 25 publications from 22 primary studies (15 randomized controlled trials; 7 nonrandomized studies). The mean number of participants in the deprescribing groups was 35, and median/mean age 64 years. In patients with heart failure, there was no clear evidence that diuretic deprescribing was associated with increased mortality compared to diuretic continuation (low certainty evidence). The risk of cardiovascular composite outcomes associated with diuretic deprescribing was inconsistent (studies showing lower risk for diuretic deprescribing, or comparable risk with diuretic continuation; very low certainty evidence). The effect on heart failure recurrence after diuretic deprescribing in patients with diuretics for heart failure, and of hypertension in patients with diuretics for hypertension was inconsistent across the included studies (low certainty evidence). In patients with diuretics for hypertension, diuretic deprescribing was well tolerated (moderate certainty evidence), while in patients with diuretics for heart failure, deprescribing diuretics can result in complaints of peripheral oedema (very low certainty evidence). The overall risk of bias was generally high. In summary, this systematic review suggests that diuretic discontinuation could be a safe and feasible treatment option for carefully selected patients. However, there isa lack of high-quality evidence on its feasibility, safety and tolerability of diuretic deprescribing, warranting further research., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) have gained prominence in the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. However, concerns arise for frail older adults, given their underrepresentation in trials and heightened susceptibility to adverse drug events. This review summarizes the clinical effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in older adults with frailty. SGLT2 inhibitors seem to exhibit consistent cardiovascular benefits irrespective of age. As such, these drugs can be beneficial for older adults with 'cardiovascular frailty': in other words, cardiovascular multimorbidity. However, in the current data there is a lack of focus on the broader definition of frailty, which also includes functional status and self-dependence. Also, some research suggest that adverse events, such as volume depletion and genitourinary infections, are more common in the frail older population. Therefore, until more data is available, SGLT2 inhibitors should be prescribed with caution in older adults living with frailty.