Search

Introduction: The death of a child has a tremendous impact on parents' lives. The experience of parents who have lost a child to cancer may differ from other bereavement experiences, including other childhood and adulthood causes of death, because of the uncertainty of the prognosis, the aggressive treatment, and the potential for regret about treatment decisions. Bereavement care remains scarce, and effective interventions to meet the diverse needs of parents have not been defined., Objective: To provide insights on bereaved parents' experiences, their needs, and wishes of support following the loss of their child to cancer., Methods: We conducted 18 qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 23 bereaved parents (seven fathers, 16 mothers), and used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze the data., Results: Parents received both informal and professional support. Regarding informal support, parents expressed a high level of ambivalence rooted in grief illiteracy. Parents also recognized their own struggles to express what forms of informal support they would have liked to receive. Support provided by healthcare professionals, institutions, and organizations involved in the children's care or in bereavement was inconsistent due to personnel time constraints, interpersonal relationships, or disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These factors could result in parents not having access to certain forms of support or not receiving long-term support., Conclusion: Improving grief literacy may strengthen informal support and make discussions of grief and death less taboo. Institutional policies, training, and networking may help to ensure that support provided by healthcare professionals, institutions, and organizations is less vulnerable to inconsistencies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is associated with improved end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. Inpatient and outpatient PPC have unique roles during the disease course. Yet, it is unknown whether the location of PPC receipt (inpatient vs. outpatient) is associated with healthcare utilization and EOL outcomes for pediatric and adolescent and young adult oncology patients., Procedure: A retrospective single-institution chart review of pediatric patients (age 0-28) with cancer who died between January 2015 and December 2022 was performed to compare EOL outcomes and healthcare utilization metrics among inpatient PPC, any outpatient PPC, and non-PPC recipients. Demographics and clinical factors were analyzed by PPC receipt location., Results: Among 450 patients, 292 (64.9%) received PPC (inpatient only 35%, any outpatient 65%). Patients who died without receiving PPC dropped from 69% to 22% following development of an outpatient PPC clinic (p < .001). In the last 6 months, 1 month, and last week of life, inpatient PPC recipients spent more days admitted to the hospital and intensive care unit (all p < .001), and had more intensive medical interventions performed (p < .01). Outpatient PPC recipients were less likely to receive intravenous (IV) chemotherapy (p < .01) or intubation (p = .05), and more likely to receive hospice, die at home, and have an outpatient do-not-resuscitate order (all p < .001)., Conclusions: PPC receipt substantially increased after the creation of an outpatient PPC clinic, suggesting that outpatient PPC is critical in the provision of PPC to children with cancer. Outpatient PPC was associated with fewer hospital days, IV chemotherapy, and intubation at EOL, while increasing hospice enrollment and home death., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)