1. 690P The prospect of direct benefit in first-in-human gene therapy studies in minors - an ethical analysis.
- Author
-
Pirson, I., Niks, E., de Vries, M., and de Graeff, N.
- Subjects
- *
PEDIATRIC therapy , *GENOME editing , *GENE therapy , *GENETIC transformation , *RISK assessment - Abstract
Recent developments in gene transfer and gene editing provide promising avenues for the treatment of monogenetic paediatric diseases. First-in-human (FIH) trials are a crucial step towards market authorization. Such trials involve notable uncertainties and risks, and for diseases that manifest in early childhood adult data are often lacking. In research involving minors, an important requirement to allow exposure to more than minimal risks is that there must be a prospect of direct benefit for the minors involved. However, in FIH pediatric gene therapy trials it can be questioned whether a certain therapy meets this requirement for a prospect of direct benefit and when such trials should be allowed, due to the uncertainty that accompanies them. To aid the review of these trials, we investigated definitions of the prospect of direct benefit in the ethical literature and important regulatory documents, such as the European Clinical Trial Regulation, FDA Common Rule and CIOMS guidelines. Additionally, we explored if and how preclinical research can substantiate evidence for the prospect of direct benefit. We found that "benefit" is inconsistently defined in regulatory documents, allowing different types of benefit to influence risk-benefit analysis. In some regulatory documents, direct benefit solely refers to clinical benefits that result from an intervention, whereas other regulations also include other, indirect, benefits in their definition of direct benefit. In addition, we found that what is meant with "prospect" is ill-defined in many regulatory documents. This raises questions on how this requirement for a "prospect" of direct benefit needs to be interpreted. We provide recommendations how this prospect could be understood. To do so, we look at different types of evidence - mechanical and statistical - that are used to substantiate claims of effectiveness, and thus potential direct benefit. Clearly defining and accurately interpreting the requirement for a prospect of direct benefit is crucial for effectively reviewing FIH pediatric gene therapy trials. A failure to do so could lead to mislabeling trials as providing a prospect of direct benefit, fostering therapeutic misconception and accepting trials with an unfavourable risk-benefit ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF