Search

Background: Measurement of rat anogenital distance (AGD) dates to at least 1912. Increased interest in endocrine disrupting chemicals and the use of AGD as a biomarker for fetal androgen effects have increased the number of studies with this endpoint in recent decades. A literature review revealed different landmarks, methods of measurement, and methods to adjust for body weight differences. AGD is often reported to hundredths of millimeters and as such, deserves precision in all these aspects. This paper presents recommendations for the measurement and analysis of rodent AGD., Methods: Literature and regulatory guidance documents that mentioned or measured rodent AGD were reviewed. Four adjustment methods were evaluated using available online data from three rat studies each with two generations of offspring., Results: Tabulation of studies reveals that species/stocks and time of data collection, but more importantly anatomical landmarks and methods of measurement have produced a variety of results which are difficult to compare. Not all studies have adjusted for test article effects on body weight (and thus size). The four adjustment methods were fairly comparable., Conclusion: Recommendations are as follows. A microscopic method should be used to measure AGD of late rodent fetuses and early postnatal pups. The caudal edge of the genital tubercle and the cranial edge of the anus are clear and identifiable landmarks. The simplest adjustment is to divide individual AGDs by the cube root of animals' body weight. These recommendations will help ensure data consistency and accuracy, and facilitate meaningful comparisons across laboratories and chemical classes., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: A new derived (i.e., calculated) endpoint of developmental toxicology has appeared in a very few studies since 1990. This endpoint is adjusted mean live fetal weight per litter or adjusted fetal weight. Given our lack of familiarity with the endpoint, we evaluated the basis, prevalence, methods, and usefulness in embryo-fetal developmental toxicity (EFDT) studies in rats., Methods: Literature searches were performed with key terms using PubMed and Google Scholar. Major textbooks were consulted but lack of any mention of the endpoint. Unpublished EFDT data, which are readily available online, were utilized to test adjustment methods., Results: Pertinent information on factors that influence fetal weight goes back a century. Four papers utilizing rats were found in which fetal weights were adjusted using either statistical or formula-based methods to adjust fetal weights. Only one study showed a clear benefit to the endpoint when there was a marked decrease in live litter size; this pointed to situations in which the new endpoint might be useful. The lone formula-based adjustment method was found to be lacking adequate testing and justifications. A new experimental alternative formula-based adjustment is shown to produce results very similar to statistical methods., Conclusions: From this assessment, we recommend that adjusted fetal weight should not be a routine endpoint at this time. However, there are likely cases where this derived endpoint could aid interpretation. We encourage other investigators to examine previous EFDT study data to establish guidance on the use of adjusted mean live fetal weights., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)