Search

Apicomplexan parasites possess several specialized structures to invade their host cells and replicate successfully. One of these is the inner membrane complex (IMC), a peripheral membrane-cytoskeletal system underneath the plasma membrane. It is composed of a series of flattened, membrane-bound vesicles and a cytoskeletal subpellicular network (SPN) comprised of intermediate filament-like proteins called alveolins. While the alveolin proteins are conserved throughout the Apicomplexa and the broader Alveolata, their precise functions and interactions remain poorly understood. Here, we describe the function of one of these alveolin proteins in Toxoplasma, IMC6. Disruption of IMC6 resulted in striking morphological defects that led to aberrant invasion and replication but surprisingly minor effects on motility. Deletion analyses revealed that the alveolin domain alone is largely sufficient to restore localization and partially sufficient for function. As this highlights the importance of the IMC6 alveolin domain, we implemented unnatural amino acid photoreactive crosslinking to the alveolin domain and identified multiple binding interfaces between IMC6 and 2 other cytoskeletal IMC proteins—IMC3 and ILP1. This provides direct evidence of protein–protein interactions in the alveolin domain and supports the long-held hypothesis that the alveolin domain is responsible for filament formation. Collectively, our study features the conserved alveolin proteins as critical components that maintain the parasite's structural integrity and highlights the alveolin domain as a key mediator of SPN architecture. Picomplexan parasites require specialized structures like the inner membrane complex to invade host cells and replicate. This study shows that the alveolin protein IMC6 is crucial for maintaining cellular morphology, invasion and successful replication in Toxoplasma gondii. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tachyzoite stage of the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii utilizes motility for multiple purposes during its lytic cycle, including host cell invasion, egress from infected cells, and migration to new uninfected host cells to repeat the process. Bradyzoite stage parasites, which establish a new infection in a naïve host, must also use motility to escape from the cysts that are ingested by the new host and then migrate to the gut wall, where they either invade cells of the intestinal epithelium or squeeze between these cells to infect the underlying connective tissue. We know very little about the motility of bradyzoites, which we analyze in detail here and compare to the well-characterized motility and motility-dependent processes of tachyzoites. Unexpectedly, bradyzoites were found to be as motile as tachyzoites in a 3D model extracellular matrix, and they showed increased invasion into and transmigration across certain cell types, consistent with their need to establish the infection in the gut. The motility of the two stages was inhibited to the same extent by cytochalasin D and KNX-002, compounds known to target the parasite's actomyosin-based motor. In contrast, other compounds that impact tachyzoite motility (tachyplegin and enhancer 5) have less of an effect on bradyzoites, and rapid bradyzoite egress from infected cells is not triggered by treatment with calcium ionophores, as it is with tachyzoites. The similarities and differences between these two life cycle stages highlight the need to characterize both tachyzoites and bradyzoites for a more complete understanding of the role of motility in the parasite life cycle and the effect that potential therapeutics targeting parasite motility will have on disease establishment and progression.