Search

Background: WALANT has gained much popularity in recent years, especially with COVID-19. However, a recent survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership (i.e. attendings/consultants) showed that only 17% were exposed to WALANT during residency or fellowship training. There is much interest in WALANT from trainees, but interpretation of the type and volume to be administered is highly varied. Methods: The aims of this study were (1) to survey a group of plastic surgery trainees in the UK about their knowledge of WALANT formulas, and (2) to compare trainee logbook records of WALANT procedures (if available) with published data from the UK. Results: All trainees were familiar with the 'standard' WALANT formula (1% lidocaine, 1:100,000 adrenaline ± 8.4% NaHCO3) described by Lalonde. However, because of local formularies, rather than 1:100,000 adrenaline, all used 1:200,000 adrenaline as it comes premixed in the UK. Other formulas used by UK trainees included 0.5% bupivacaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline, and mixing 1% lidocaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline with 1% lidocaine 1:1. In comparing available trainee WALANT records with published UK data, the average volume of WALANT used was 6.6 mls in the current study versus 12.9 mls for similar procedures (wound debridement and skin closure ± local flap, digital nerve repair, fingertip reconstruction, thenar injuries, phalangeal fracture and single digit extensor repair); specifically, for single digit flexor tendon repairs, this was 10 mls versus 16.3 mls. Conclusions: While the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have developed official guidance for the use of WALANT in the UK, it appears there remains much variation in interpretation and hence, application. Comparison of trainee logbook records of common hand surgery procedures suggests that most can be done with much less WALANT administered than previously reported, with safe and reproducible results. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the study was to determine if perioperative prescription anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) medication use increases the rate of revision surgeries or complications following wide-awake hand surgery performed under local anesthesia. All patients who underwent outpatient wide-awake hand surgery under local anesthesia without a tourniquet by two fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at a single academic practice over a 3-year period were included. Prescription history was reviewed to determine if any prescriptions were filled for an AC/AP drug within 90 days of surgery. All cases requiring revision were identified. Office notes were reviewed to determine postoperative complications and/or postoperative antibiotics prescribed for infection concerns. The number of revisions, complications, and postoperative antibiotic prescriptions were compared between patients who did, and did not, use perioperative AC/AP drugs. A total of 2,162 wide-awake local anesthesia surgeries were included, and there were 128 cases (5.9%) with perioperative AC/AP use. Of the 2,162 cases, 19 cases required revision surgery (18 without AC/AP use and one with AC/AP use). Postoperative wound complications occurred in 42 patients (38 without AC/AP use and four with AC/AP use). Of the wound complications, four were related to postoperative bleeding, one case of incisional bleeding, and three cases of incisional hematomas (three without AC/AP use and one with AC/AP use). None of these patients required additional intervention; their incisional bleeding or hematoma was resolved by their subsequent office visit. Sixty-five patients received postoperative antibiotics for infection concerns (59 without AC/AP use and six with AC/AP use). Prescription AC/AP medication use in the perioperative period for wide-awake hand surgery performed under local anesthesia was not associated with an increased risk for revision surgery or postoperative wound complications. This study demonstrates the safety of continuing patients' prescribed AC/AP medications during wide-awake hand surgery. Prognosis IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The second COVID-19 wave severely limited access to elective surgery. Methods: Between December 2020 and May 2021, 530 patients underwent a procedure in the elective ambulatory unit (EAU), a walk-in and walk-out model of surgery, and we used a prepandemic cohort of day-case patients for comparison. Results: We have had no confirmed cases of COVID-19 transmission on-site. The infection rate for EAU and day-case units for carpal tunnel decompression was 1.36% and 2%, respectively, and this difference was not significant, P =.696. Patient satisfaction was excellent at 9.8 of 10. The waiting time from primary care referral to carpal tunnel decompression was cut from 36 weeks to 12 weeks during the study period. Significant benefit in efficiency and cost saving was also found. Conclusion: Elective ambulatory unit provides a template to perform high-volume low-complexity hand and wrist surgery in a safe, efficient, and cost-effective manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) offers a cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for wound debridement, improving patient safety, surgical accessibility, and cost-efficiency. This study explores WALANT’s cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes in a resource-limited setting. The patient, E.M., a 27-year-old woman, presented with left upper limb swelling, which began a week after Implanon device removal at another facility. Upon admission, she displayed severe sepsis symptoms, including a blood pressure of 100/58 mmHg, a heart rate of 144 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 24 breaths per minute, and a temperature of 39.2℃. Her left upper limb showed swelling, redness, and shininess, leading to a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis with septic shock. Initially, wound debridement was conducted under GA. However, the patient’s choice to undergo WALANT for her second debridement saved her 89.1% of the cost of performing debridement under GA. This cost reduction significantly benefited the uninsured patient, alleviating the financial burden and also achieved a favorable patient outcome within the constraints of a resource-limited setting.

Fishing as a hobby is fairly popular among youth in hilly and mountainous areas of the world. Hence, injuries to extremities are also common by fishing equipment, especially in untrained people using indigenous equipment. The mechanism of injury is that of penetrating trauma. There is a paucity of literature regarding fishing equipment injury to extremities. In this article, we have presented a case series of fishing arrow injuries presented to us in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Most of these injuries were treated under the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique which has revolutionized the management of extremity injuries. Also, special precautions regarding the prevention of further tissue injury by arrow hooks while retrieving the arrows have been highlighted.

Introduction: Wide-awake local anesthesia and no tourniquet (WALANT) represents a revolutionary technique for hand surgeons who dismiss tourniquets and sedation. In this study, we present our experience with the WALANT technique in primary flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Patient and methods: This prospective research was carried out on 30 patients undergoing hand primary, flexor tendon repair surgery. Flexor tendon injury zones 2, 3, 4, and 5 were included. WALANT was prepared and injected. The tendons were surgically managed by a cruciate single cross-stitched locked 4-strand technique. The pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) score. The range of motion (ROM) of affected fingers was assessed according to the Strickland evaluation system. Results: There was a highly significant relationship between the patient's compliance with physiotherapy and obtained ROM of the affected finger with a P value

Introduction: There has been an increase in the popularity of the wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT) procedure for various upper limb surgeries. The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the satisfaction levels of 106 patients, considering factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, and the specific procedures they underwent. Method: The present study was a retrospective cohort study conducted to analyze the overall satisfaction of a cohort of 106 patients who underwent various surgical procedures of the hand between 2018 and 2023. The satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire comprising 13 questions/statements adjusted to a standard Swiss grading system (from 1 = I strongly agree to 6 = I strongly disagree). Results: Overall satisfaction with WALANT was high, with most patients expressing positive experiences. Patients with hypertension reported similar satisfaction levels compared to those without, while diabetic patients experienced significantly higher anxiety levels during the procedure (p > 0.05). Conclusion: WALANT exhibits versatility as an anesthesia choice, demonstrating efficacy in both routine and complex hand surgeries. Our survey-based study reveals a high satisfaction level across diverse procedures. When assessing the correlation between WALANT satisfaction and patient comorbidities, hypertension displayed no significant impact, while diabetic patients reported heightened anxiety. Importantly, patient satisfaction remained consistently high even within the subgroup with comorbidities. Our results underscore WALANT's reliability in upper limb surgery, showcasing its usefulness and positive outcomes across a broad range of patients and surgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nipple hypertrophy is a common esthetic problem in Asian women. Many patients are uncomfortable and seek plastic surgeons for correction. Although several reduction methods have been published, the new nipple size is not always decided by patients under conventional anesthesia. We describe a novel cinnamon roll technique with wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) to decrease pain, provide a bloodless field and allow on-table discussion of the ideal nipple size during surgery. Methods: Between November 2015 and October 2022, fifteen patients with 30 nipples were enrolled. The patient's characteristic data, nipple height and width, and VAS while infiltration were recorded. Aesthetic results were evaluated by rating a satisfactory score from 0 to 10 at follow-up. Sensory recovery was also evaluated for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months sequentially after the surgery. Results: Before surgery, the mean diameter and height of the nipples were 13.2 ± 1.8 mm and 12 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the mean diameter and height of the nipples were 8.8 ± 1.2 mm and 8.7 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The mean VAS while infiltration was 1.3 ± 0.5 and the mean satisfactory score at the latest clinic follow-up was 9.3 ± 0.6. No complications such as nipple necrosis, infection, numbness or hypertrophic scar occurred. The mean clinical follow-up period was 3.4 months. Conclusions: Cinnamon roll technique with WALANT is a simple, safe and reliable method with short learning curve and high satisfaction. Our technique offers a chance for patients to control subjective pleasing size of their own nipples. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fishing as a hobby is fairly popular among youth in hilly and mountainous areas of the world. Hence, injuries to extremities are also common by fishing equipment, especially in untrained people using indigenous equipment. The mechanism of injury is that of penetrating trauma. There is a paucity of literature regarding fishing equipment injury to extremities. In this article, we have presented a case series of fishing arrow injuries presented to us in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Most of these injuries were treated under the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique which has revolutionized the management of extremity injuries. Also, special precautions regarding the prevention of further tissue injury by arrow hooks while retrieving the arrows have been highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Environmental sustainability is an important issue in health care because of large amounts of greenhouse gases attributable to hospitals. The operating room has been highlighted as one of the highest contributors, prompting several initiatives by organizations focused on the care of hand and upper extremity conditions. This study aimed to quantify and compare the carbon footprint of a common hand surgery in two different surgical settings, the procedure room (PR) and operating room. We hypothesized that open carpal tunnel release (oCTR) will generate a greater environmental impact in the operating room than in the PR. This was a retrospective review of oCTRs performed at a tertiary care medical center. Current procedural technology codes isolated a single cohort of patients who underwent bilateral oCTR, one side performed in the PR and the contralateral side in the operating room. Current published emission conversions were used to calculate carbon footprint at our institution based on energy expenditure necessary for the creation and disposal of waste and sterilization of surgical equipment. Surgery time was combined with heating, ventilation and air conditioning/lighting energy consumption to estimate facility emissions. Fourteen patients had bilateral oCTR surgery performed in both settings. Open CTR performed in the operating room generated 3.7 kg more solid waste than when performed in the PR. In total, emissions from oCTR performed in the operating room generated 32.4 kg CO 2 , whereas oCTR in the PR emitted 13.0 kg CO 2 per surgery. Performing a common hand procedure (oCTR) is more environmentally sustainable in the PR than in the operating room, with a 60% reduction in carbon footprint. Greater effort should be made to perform surgery in the PR instead of the operating room in appropriately indicated patients. Surgical sets should be evaluated for the necessity of included equipment and unnecessary waste. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is an increasingly popular anesthetic technique used in hand surgery which uses local anesthetic and epinephrine, achieves adequate anesthesia, and eliminates the need for a tourniquet. Objective. This study compares the onset and duration of the three most commonly used concentrations of lidocaine and epinephrine for WALANT. Methodology. This was a randomized double-blind comparative study of 78 middle fingers subjected to either 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine or 0.25% lidocaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The pinprick test was used to measure onset time and anesthetic duration for the local effect and as a digital nerve block. Results. The contents of each treatment arm were as follows: Arm A: 0.25% lidocaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine, Arm B: 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and Arm C: 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Arm B had the shortest onset time (30.77 ± 10.39 seconds for local, 2.78 ± 0.69 minutes for digital block) followed by Arm C (38 ± 17.17 seconds for local, 4.30 ± 1.62 minutes for digital block) and Arm A (55.38 ± 18.48 seconds for local, 5.18 ± 1.46 minutes for digital block, p

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet is named the WALANT technique. WALANT has had a major positive impact on cost, convenience, ecology, patient satisfaction, access to surgical care, and outcomes in hand surgery in the last 20 years. Safe and efficient application of the technique is based on two principles. The first principle is the tumescent injection of a large volume low concentration 0.25–1% lidocaine, with 1:100 000–1:400 000 epinephrine. The second principle of WALANT is that the proper injection should be almost painless, with the patient only feeling the first needle poke of a tiny 30G needle. This wide awake patient approach reduces pain, neuropraxia, and systemic side effects of sedation with preservation of motor control, thereby aiding balanced reconstruction in hand surgery.

Abstract Background The Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique allows intraoperative motor assessment of tendon repair integrity of the hand compared with general anesthesia or brachial plexus block. No studies have tested the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to lidocaine on the analgesic properties of the WALANT technique, which is the aim of our study. Methods A total of 128 patients aged more than 18 years were scheduled for surgical flexor tendon injury repair using WALANT technique. Patients were divided into two equal groups. Ultrasound-guided subcutaneous injection of lidocaine 1% with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg), Group D, or without dexmedetomidine, Group C, was performed at four points: proximal to the wrist joint, the distal forearm, palm region, and proximal phalanges. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption throughout the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, time to first analgesic request, and pain score. Results Total morphine consumption was significantly (P

Purpose: Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT), a groundbreaking anaesthetic technique resurging in practice, warrants a comprehensive safety analysis for informed adoption. Our study aimed to identify complications/side effects of WALANT upper limb procedures through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered study was performed with strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Embase, OVIDMedline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched until February 2023. Inclusion criteria involved English articles, reporting complications/side effects in primary WALANT upper limb surgeries. Outcomes included all complications and side effects, data on the anaesthetic mixture, publication year/location, study type, and procedures performed. The meta-analysis employed the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation, computed I2 statistics, and utilized common or random effects models for pooled analysis. Results: 2002 studies were identified; 79 studies met the inclusion criteria representing 15,595 WALANT patients. A total of 301 patients had complications, and the meta-analysis using a random effects model provided a complication rate of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.93–2.7%). The most reported complications were superficial infection (41%, n = 123/300), other/specified (12%, n = 37/300), and recurrent disease (6.7%, n = 20/300). A decade-by-decade analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in complication rates spanning the last three decades (p = 0.42). Adding sodium bicarbonate to the anaesthetic solution significantly reduced postoperative complications (p = 0.025). Conclusion: WALANT has a low overall complication rate of 1.7%, with no significant temporal variation and a significant reduction in complications when sodium bicarbonate is added to the anaesthetic solution. Our findings support the safety of WALANT in upper limb procedures. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023404018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study was to assess the patient experience of trapeziectomy under WALANT for trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) in a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 23 patients with TMJ OA undergoing trapeziectomy with WALANT. All patients were seen by a hand therapist preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. At each visit, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. The Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) questionnaire was administered within 2 weeks of surgery. RESULTS All 23 patients completed the PPE-15 questionnaire. Their mean age was 64 years. The 21 patients who remained at the 24-month follow-up all said they would choose the same anaesthesia method again. At this follow-up, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, key pinch grip and DASH scores had improved significantly, while thumb opposition and hand grip strength remained largely unchanged. The majority of patients felt well informed before and during the procedure, and all patients rated pain relief as good or satisfactory. Nearly 40% of patients reported receiving inadequate information about the postoperative medications. DISCUSSION Patients have a positive attitude to trapeziectomy with WALANT, and seem to prefer WALANT over other methods of anaesthesia. Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is a safe procedure and appears to give a functional outcome similar to trapeziectomy under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is safe, preferred by patients and has similar clinical outcome as trapeziectomy in general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cost, efficiency, patient preference, and safety have driven utilization of wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) in hand surgery. This is not well documented in adolescents. We hypothesize that the use of WALANT with adolescents reduced time spent in the operating room (OR) and in the hospital when compared with patients who underwent surgery with traditional anesthesia (TA). Methods: After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of patients aged 10 to 17 who underwent surgery at a regional hospital system including the level 1 pediatric trauma hospital. Operative notes were assessed for use of WALANT. We excluded those operations not traditionally amenable to WALANT. Using a propensity matched cohort, hospital time, OR time, and perioperative complications were recorded and compared to evaluate efficiency and perioperative safety. Results: There were 28 cases in the WALANT group and 28 cases in the TA group after excluding cases not amenable to WALANT, and cases were propensity matched. Although the operative time (incision to closure) was similar, for WALANT patients, the in-room to procedure time (15 vs 22 minutes), procedure end to out-room time (5 vs 10 minutes), total room time (52.81 vs 63.68), and length of hospital stay (222 vs 342 minutes) were shorter than patients in the TA group. Conclusion: Our case series demonstrates time-savings both in the OR and in the hospital overall. Avoiding TA when WALANT is feasible may result in significant savings to hospital systems, patients, and payers while also freeing up anesthesia staff and perioperative nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique allows intraoperative motor assessment of tendon repair integrity of the hand compared with general anesthesia or brachial plexus block. No studies have tested the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to lidocaine on the analgesic properties of the WALANT technique, which is the aim of our study. Methods: A total of 128 patients aged more than 18 years were scheduled for surgical flexor tendon injury repair using WALANT technique. Patients were divided into two equal groups. Ultrasound-guided subcutaneous injection of lidocaine 1% with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg), Group D, or without dexmedetomidine, Group C, was performed at four points: proximal to the wrist joint, the distal forearm, palm region, and proximal phalanges. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption throughout the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, time to first analgesic request, and pain score. Results: Total morphine consumption was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in group D (2.66 ± 0.998) than in group C (3.66 ± 1.144) mg. Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in group D (54.7% (35)) than group C (100.0% (64)). The time for first request for analgesia was significantly (P < 0.001) longer in group D (11.31 ± 6.944) than in group C (5.91 ± 4.839) h. Pain score was significantly higher in group C than D at three (P < 0.001), and six (P = 0.001) hours (P = 0.001) postoperatively. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine significantly improves the analgesic quality of WALANT when added to lidocaine with less opioid consumption. Trial registration: (ID: PACTR202203906027106; Date: 31/07/2023). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet is a cost-effective anesthetic alternative that holds the potential to increase access to affordable and effective surgery. This surgical innovation was popularized by American hand surgeons who performed procedures successfully in less time, using less resources, with low infection rates and pain self-reports, which has since been validated with follow-up studies (4; 7; 15). This manuscript documents the impact of WALANT and presents a framework for educating health professionals on the innovation by reviewing the methods of a surgical workshop held in Eldoret, Kenya. It finally encourages the dissemination of WALANT training, since the technique has presented itself as a helpful tool in the efforts to improve access to safe and affordable surgery in East Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature on fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs) under wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT), and to examine postoperative pain scores and functional outcomes, operative data including operative time and blood loss, and the frequency of adverse events. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched from inception until May 2022 for relevant studies. Studies were screened in duplicate, and data on pain scores, functional outcomes, and adverse events were recorded. Due to methodological and statistical heterogeneity, the results are presented in a descriptive fashion. Results: Ten studies were included comprising 456 patients with closed, unilateral DRFs, of whom 226 underwent fixation under WALANT. These patients had a mean age of 52.8 ± 8.3 years, were 48% female, and had a mean follow-up time of 11.6 months (range: 6-24). Operative time for WALANT patients averaged 60.4 ± 6.5 minutes, with mean postoperative pain scores of 1.4 ± 0.6 on a 10-point scale. Studies that compared WALANT to general anesthesia found shorter hospital stays with most WALANT patients being sent home the same day, decreased postoperative pain scores, and decreased costs to the healthcare system. No adverse events were reported for WALANT patients. Conclusions: A growing body of literature reports that for closed, unilateral DRF, surgical fixation under WALANT is a safe and effective option. It allows patients to have surgery sooner, with improved pain scores and good functional outcomes, with a very low incidence of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Flexor tendon injuries represent a significant per-centage of admissions in emergency departments in Egypt. A bloodless surgical field is important to perform a hand surgery. Traditionally, a tourniquet is used for hemostasis, and the standered anesthetic techniques utilized in hand surgery were general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, or brachial plexus block. Recently the evolving Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique where patient is operated on under local anesthesia and hemostasis is achieved via adrenaline could be a better choice. Aim of this work is to compare the intraoperative pain scores, induction time, operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, and patient satisfaction with WALANT versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SC-BPB ) with tourniquet, in patients under-going flexor tendon repair. Patients and Methods: In the current study 52 patients who underwent flexor tendon intervention were divided randomly into two groups, each group consisting of 26 patients. Group A: Patients in this group received WALANT. Group B: Patients in this group received SC-BPB with a tourniquet applied to the arm. Results: Intraoperative Wong-Baker Faces scale revealed no statistically significant difference in intraoperative pain scores in both groups, except during injection (p = 0.04). Tourniquet-related pain was reported in 23% of patients of SC-BPB group (p = 0.001). Induction time was significantly shorter in WALANT (p < 0.01) but time needed to obtain sufficient hemostasis is sig-nificantly more in WALANT than SC-BPB (p < 0.01) while surgical time was similar in both groups (p = 0.538). Blood loss in spite of being minimal it was statistically significant higher in WALANT (p < 0.01). Conclusion: WALANT anesthesia was found to be better alter-native to SC-BPB in flexor tendon repair surgeries in adults being more simple technique and no need for special skills or ultrasound device, less time consumed in induction and less injection pain also no tourniquet-related pain, intraoperative active motion of the hand is preserved facilitating surgical technique, better effect on postoperative analgesia and more patient and surgeon satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies examining the implementation of clinic-based procedure rooms (PRs) for wide-awake hand surgery have reported cost reduction, decreased burden on hospital systems, and improved patient satisfaction. This study evaluates other resource savings, primarily time spent by patients in the hospital. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a PR or the operating room group for prospective evaluation. Time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery, several preprocedure appointments, complications, and cost comparisons were evaluated between the two groups. Patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated with postoperative surveys assessing anxiety, pain, and satisfaction. Significant time savings were noted between the groups. The median time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery for the patients in the operating room group was 256 minutes versus 90 minutes for the PR group, a time savings of approximately 3 hours. Eight additional preoperative clinic visits for operating room patients were generated compared with no additional preoperative visits for PR patients. Cost savings for surgeries performed in the clinic-based procedure amounted to $232,411. No postoperative complications were observed in the clinic setting. Continued utilization of the clinical PR for select hand surgery procedures will reduce the cost and time burdens for procedures while maintaining satisfaction and safety. A clinic-based PR for performing minor hand surgeries saves the patient time and ostensibly allows the operating room to be used for more complex surgeries that are not easily amenable to a wide-awake in-clinic procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Wide-awake hand surgery has allowed many hand procedures to be moved out of the operating room and into minor procedure rooms while increasing efficiency, maintaining safety, and reducing both patient and hospital costs. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and postoperative complications of wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet procedures performed in a community-based hospital procedure room. Methods: A total of 786 patients underwent 948 elective hand procedures in a hospital procedure room. At the conclusion of their surgeries, the patients were surveyed regarding their satisfaction. Following surgery, patients were evaluated for postoperative complications including infections. The trend in postoperative infection rates across 8 age groups was analyzed using a Cochran-Armitage test in R. Results: The overall infection rate was 6.2% ( n  = 59). All infections were superficial. Carpal tunnel had the highest number of infections ( n  = 25), followed by trigger finger ( n  = 8), and the combination trigger finger with carpal tunnel ( n  = 7). All infections were managed with antibiotics and/or soaks. Three patients did require a return to the operating room for irrigation and debridement. Ninety-nine percent of patients said the procedure room experience was better or the same as going to the dentist, would recommend wide-awake anesthesia to a friend or family member, and would undergo the procedure again. Conclusion: Wide-awake procedures performed in a hospital procedure room have low infection rates with high patient satisfaction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Traditionally, surgical repair of phalanx fractures was performed under general anesthesia. However, the emergence of regional and local anesthesia, otherwise known as Wide-awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet, provides an alternative approach where general anesthesia is undesirable. The choice of anesthetic approach resides with clinicians, though it is important to factor in the evidence that regional/local provides not only an alternative anesthesia approach but also potentially avoids comorbidities associated with general anesthesia. This study hypothesizes that the use of local/regional anesthesia for phalanx fracture/dislocation has comparable outcomes to general anesthesia and provides for fewer adverse events. Methods: To answer the research purpose, the investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases reported to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. The study population included patients in the NSQIP database who underwent operative fixation of a phalanx fracture or dislocation in 2 cohorts, those with local/regional anesthesia or general anesthesia. The predictor variables were preoperative patient demographic data, including age, gender, surgical specialty, elective surgery, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and open wound. Results: A total of 2831 patients were identified in the NSQIP database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Local/regional anesthesia was performed in 13% of patients with the remaining 87% receiving general anesthesia. Surgical site occurrences were not clinically significant between the 2 groups. Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the local/regional cohort included one patient with a deep vein thrombosis (0.03%) and pulmonary embolus (0.02%). Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the general anesthesia cohort included pneumonia (0.12%) and stroke (0.08%). Conclusions: Surgery using the regional/local anesthesia techniques for patients with phalanx fractures or dislocations is safe and can be used in situations where general anesthesia is undesirable as post-operative 30-day complications are similar to those with general anesthesia., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Objectives: We aimed to compare clinical and functional results of treatment of scaphoid pseudoarthrosis between patients undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) versus axillary block anesthesia. Methods: The patients diagnosed with scaphoid non-union who underwent pseudoarthoris surgery were divided into WALANT group ( n   =  12) and axial block group ( n   =  11). Visual analog scores (VAS) were measured by calling the patients via phone on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The VASs were also measured on the 14 th day during patient check-ups. At the end of 12 months, Michigan Hand Questionnaire was used to assess clinical recovery. Bone union rate and surgery time were also investigated. Radiological and clinical examinations were compared between the groups. Results: Eleven patients (91.7%) in the WALANT group and 10 patients (90.9%) in the axillary block group achieved bone union ( P   =  .94). Although there was no significant difference in preoperative VAS score between the groups, the WALANT group had significantly lower VAS score of the first 3 days postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the groups on the seventh and 14 th day postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding Michigan score, time to surgery, time to union and operation time. Conclusion: The scaphoid pseudoarthrosis surgery can be done safely with WALANT technique which has significant lower VAS score on the first 3 days postoperatively., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Carpal tunnel release can be performed as open or endoscopic surgery. In WALANT (wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet) a tourniquet is not used, ensuring less discomfort for the patient. In locoregional distal nerve block, on the other hand, a tourniquet is needed and can be painful. This raises the question as to which method of anesthesia is actually preferred for the patient and the surgeon. Patients undergoing staged bilateral carpal tunnel release present a unique opportunity to study this question., Methods: Fifteen patients were included in this prospective study. The primary endpoint was the preference for anesthesia type in patients and surgeons. Surgeon preference was based on the visibility and fluency of the procedure. Secondary endpoints for patients comprised pain scores for performing surgery and anesthesia and pain caused by the tourniquet., Results: Baseline demographic and clinical information was collected. There was no significant difference in pain for performing local anesthesia or surgery. Surgeons may find that performing endoscopic release under WALANT is more challenging, as visibility tends to be significantly poorer. The mean pain caused by the tourniquet used during the wrist block procedure was rated as 3.6. In both surgeries, 77% (10/13) of the patients preferred the WALANT anesthesia., Conclusion: In general, endoscopic carpal tunnel release was better tolerated under WALANT than locoregional distal nerve block. Although statistical analysis showed no significant difference in visibility and fluency for the surgeon between the two anesthesia techniques, we do not recommend endoscopic release under WALANT due to the consistent report of reduced visibility in the surgical field. This limitation, likely related to the presence of anesthetic fluid, may have failed to reach statistical significance due to small sample size, but is nevertheless a considerable challenge in practice., Level of Evidence: 1B., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: The cost of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) has historically been shown to be significantly higher than the cost of open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Setting and anesthetic technique drive costs in hand surgery; ambulatory surgical center (ASC) settings demonstrate lower costs when compared to hospital-based settings and local-only anesthetic techniques demonstrate savings over general anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare wide awake local-only anesthesia technique (WALANT) to monitored anesthetic care (MAC) for ECTR performed in an ASC setting., Methods: This study includes 481 ECTR under WALANT and 405 ECTR under MAC, performed between January 2019 and December 2021 in an ASC. Utilizing previously reported direct operating room costs, overhead, and material costs, we calculated a final cost for each procedure. We also report our complication rates: intraoperative conversion to OCTR and late revision to OCTR., Results: Intraoperative times were shortest for ECTR performed under WALANT (22 min) versus ECTR under MAC (25 min). The total cost for ECTR under WALANT was most cost-effective at $1341.28 versus ECTR under MAC at $1634.00. Both techniques demonstrated a low complication profile., Conclusions: Our intraoperative process flow, staffing model, and ASC setting resulted in cost savings making ECTR an economically feasible option., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is increasing in popularity within hand surgery. However, evidence is unclear on patient satisfaction rates when WALANT is compared against more traditional anaesthetic techniques where pneumatic tourniquets are used. The present study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction rates of patient with the WALANT technique., Methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 2003 up to June 2023. The review was carried out among adults undergoing elective hand surgery. The mean difference in operation time and standardised mean difference (SMD) for patient satisfaction and post-operative pain (<24 h) were computed using the random effects model. The quality of studies was evaluated using RoB-2 for RCTs and risk of bias in non-randomised studies ROBINS-I for observational studies. Data were collated and a meta-analysis was performed., Results: Five RCTs and 15 observational studies were included in our analysis, comprising a total cohort of 1800 patients. Among them, 899 patients received WALANT (50.0%). Among the RCTs, patient satisfaction was found to be higher in patients receiving WALANT (SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.11-1.92, p = 0.03, I² = 93%). Post-operative pain was found to be non-significant using WALANT (95% CI -3.72-0.03, p = 0.10, I² = 99%), as was operative time difference (95% CI -0.42-0.40, p = 0.96, I² = 0%)., Conclusion: The use of WALANT in elective hand surgery potentially results in higher satisfaction rates compared with anaesthesia with tourniquets. Post-operative pain and operation time were also found to be non-inferior in WALANT, but more robust studies are needed to verify these findings., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. Methods: A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft 2 ) to calculate requirements for each procedure. Results: Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft 2 ), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft 2 ), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft 2 ), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft 2 ), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft 2 ) and minor procedures (49 ft 2 ). Conclusions: Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft 2 ), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft 2 ), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft 2 ) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft 2 ). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).

Humeral shaft nonunion is a challenging orthopedic condition that often requires surgical intervention for successful healing. In this case report, we present a 53-year-old male patient who presented with a humeral shaft nonunion, Underlying Systemic Disorders, and Arteriovenous fistula. The patient had a history of a previous humeral shaft fracture managed with open reduction and internal fixation but developed nonunion despite appropriate initial treatment. The complexity of this case was compounded by the patient's preference for a minimally invasive approach and the desire to avoid general anesthesia due to underlying medical conditions., Competing Interests: The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article's research, authorship, and/or publication., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Tourniquets are commonly used in extremity surgery to help provide a bloodless operative field to improve visibility and reduce length of procedures. With the development of WALANT (wide awake, local anaesthetic, no tourniquet) techniques, many surgeons undertake surgery without tourniquet inflation. The correct technique of pneumatic tourniquet application is poorly understood by healthcare staff. The application of a tight tourniquet when applied for optional use or use for only a portion of a procedure, rather than for inflation throughout can cause venous engorgement of an extremity leading to increased blood loss and reduced operative field visualisation thereby discouraging surgeons from persevering with WALANT strategies., Aim: To determine the effect of tourniquet application tension on limb volume prior to skin incision., Methods: 30 volunteers had the volume of their non-dominant forearm measured post-inflation of a surgical tourniquet using two different application techniques. Tight application was defined as the tourniquet fastened using a dynamometer to a tension of 100 N. Loose application was defined as the tourniquet fastened using a dynamometer to a tension of 50 N. The tourniquet was then inflated to 200 mmHg after both application techniques. Exsanguination was performed by elevation of the arm for 1 min prior to tourniquet inflation. At 5 min the forearm volume was measured using a volume displacement technique., Results: 93 % of participants (28/30) had a higher volume of water displaced when the tourniquet was applied tightly. The mean difference between the loose and tight applications was 30.06 mls., Conclusion: The increase in volume in tightly applied tourniquets is believed to result from increased intravascular volume. This increase in blood volume can lead to increased intra-operative blood loss and poor intra-operative visualisation when operating without tourniquet inflation. Loose application of the tourniquet pre-inflation appears to prevent sequestration of venous blood in the limb, therefore decreasing operative blood loss and improving view for operating., Level of Evidence: Level 1; Symptom Prevalence Study., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Lacertus syndrome consists in proximal median nerve entrapment with median nerve compression at the lacertus fibrosus, causing hand weakness and fatigue, forearm pain and occasional numbness. Recent advances emphasized the importance of clinical examination, due to limitations in electromyographic diagnosis and delayed diagnosis. The Hagert clinical triad, lacertus notch sign, lacertus antagonist test and taping help accurate diagnosis. Non-operative treatment should be tried; and surgical techniques, whether open or ultrasound-guided under WALANT (wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet) show promising outcomes. Improved awareness, accurate diagnosis and innovative treatments enhance patient care for this challenging condition., (Copyright © 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The use of wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) in free flap surgery has been limited and discouraged because of the concern that the adrenaline will cause vasoconstriction. We report our positive experience in free flap harvesting and transfer. Level of evidence: IV., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

In patients with severe, long-standing carpal tunnel syndrome and thenar muscle atrophy, nerve decompression alone is unlikely to restore thumb opposition. A multitude of tendon transfer techniques have been described to restore thumb opposition. We describe the technique of an endoscopic carpal tunnel release with opponensplasty using ring finger flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon under Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) and ultrasound assistance., Competing Interests: Authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© 2024 Society for Indian Hand Surgery and Micro Surgeons. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: The regional hand trauma service in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, underwent significant reorganisation early in the COVID-19 pandemic, with a shift from predominantly general anaesthesia (GA) procedures to the adoption of a Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique. We implemented strategies targeted towards optimising patient experience, largely applicable to most healthcare settings., Methods: Four domains were explored: (i) compliance in timing to nationally agreed treatment guidelines, (ii) the role of patient information leaflets, (iii) the introduction of a post-operative analgesia protocol, and (iv) broadly evaluating the environmental impact following the implementation of a same-day 'see and treat' service., Results: Following reorganisation to a predominantly WALANT service, we observed an increase in compliance with nationally agreed standards for the treatment of common hand injuries. Patient education and peri-operative counselling reduced anxiety, whereas post-operative pain was better managed with the introduction of an analgesic protocol. Using a travel carbon calculator, it can be inferred that there are significant reductions in carbon emissions generated when patients are evaluated and treated on the same day as their clinical presentation., Conclusions: It is widely acknowledged that WALANT benefits patients and the healthcare system. We contemplated whether further incremental changes in clinical practice could further improve patient experience. Given our findings, we advocate a multi-modal approach with a greater focus on patient outcomes (trials are currently underway, e.g., WAFER) supplemented by universally accepted validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Clinical Audit Department - Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust issued approval N/A. Individual audits were registered, and approval for data collection was granted via the Clinical Audit Department - Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Elzagh et al.)

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet is named the WALANT technique. WALANT has had a major positive impact on cost, convenience, ecology, patient satisfaction, access to surgical care, and outcomes in hand surgery in the last 20 years. Safe and efficient application of the technique is based on two principles. The first principle is the tumescent injection of a large volume low concentration 0.25-1% lidocaine, with 1:100 000-1:400 000 epinephrine. The second principle of WALANT is that the proper injection should be almost painless, with the patient only feeling the first needle poke of a tiny 30G needle. This wide awake patient approach reduces pain, neuropraxia, and systemic side effects of sedation with preservation of motor control, thereby aiding balanced reconstruction in hand surgery.

The advent of minimal pain tumescent local anesthesia injection has improved patient safety by eliminating the need for sedation for many wide awake operations, especially in patients with significant medical comorbidities. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer is commonly performed under general anesthesia as it requires the dissection of the entire breast and an ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). General anesthesia has been shown to have a high risk in patients with severe medical comorbidities. We present a case of a 78-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with invasive ductal breast carcinoma, cardiac failure, and other metabolic abnormalities. Taking his comorbidities into account, we performed a wide awake MRM and ALND after tumescent minimal pain local anesthesia injection. The patient experienced the successful procedure safely with minimal discomfort., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Recently, the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique and relative motion extension (RME) splint changed practice in extensor tendon reconstruction and therapy. We wanted to share our approach for zones 5 to 8 extensor tendon management following the up-to-date developments. The impacts of surgery under WALANT and early active motion therapy with RME splinting were explained frankly and shown in several videos throughout the article., (© 2024 Society for Indian Hand Surgery and Micro Surgeons. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Wrist arthroscopy is an evolving procedure. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of diagnostic arthroscopy of the wrist using a new tool, the NanoScope, under wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT)., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 30 consecutive patients with suspected ligament tear after wrist trauma and remaining symptoms after initial conservative management. All patients had an MRI prior to the NanoScope procedure., Results: The patients comprised 17 men and 13 women, with a mean age of 31 years. One patient declined the NanoScope procedure following their MRI. In the remaining 29 patients, NanoScope wrist arthroscopy revealed 19 cases of triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) tears and 11 tears of the scapholunate (SL) or lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments. The correlation between preoperative MRI and the findings from NanoScope arthroscopy was poor. Six patients had additional surgery after the NanoScope arthroscopy, comprising three TFCC sutures, one SL and one LT ligament reconstruction respectively, and one wrist arthrodesis. No complications related to the NanoScope arthroscopies were noted., Conclusion: NanoScope arthroscopy of the wrist is safe, is well-suited for surgery in WALANT, and has superior diagnostic capacity compared to MRI. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of the NanoScope in the management of wrist ligament pathologies., Level of Evidence: This is a level 4 study., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Surgeons across all subspecialties had to adapt to the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic to triage patients and steward hospital resources. Hand surgeons found themselves in a unique position to move some hospital-based procedures to a clinic-based setting, which has now impacted their postpandemic practices. Performing procedures in the clinic using the wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet technique is interestingly similar to minor surgeries traditionally carried out in a general surgery clinic. By abstracting institutional case volumes from orthopedic, hand, and general surgery departments from 2019 to 2022, we identified trends that further support the potential for clinic-based procedures in hand surgery. This communication provides a foundation to compare cost and surgical indications for wide-awake local anesthesia across surgical disciplines., Competing Interests: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: This study examined the complication rate of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the clinic setting with field sterility at a single private practice. We hypothesized that WALANT is safe and effective with a low complication rate., Methods: This retrospective chart review included 1228 patients who underwent in-office WALANT hand procedures at a single private practice between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into groups based on type of procedure: carpal tunnel release, A1 pulley release, first dorsal compartment release, extensor tendon repair, mass excision, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy. Patient demographics and complications were recorded; statistical comparisons of cohort demographics and risk factors for complications were completed, and P < .05 was considered significant for all statistical comparisons., Results: The overall complication rate for all procedures was 2.77% for 1228 patients including A1 pulley release (n = 962, 2.7%), mass excision (n = 137, 3.7%), extensor tendon repair (n = 23, 4.3%), and first dorsal compartment release (n = 22, 8.3%). Carpal tunnel release, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy groups experienced no complications. No adverse events (e.g. vasovagal reactions, digital ischemia, local anesthetic toxicity, inadequate vasoconstriction) were observed in any group. Patients with known autoimmune disorders and those who were currently smoking had a statistically significant higher complication rate., Conclusions: Office-based WALANT procedures with field sterility are safe and effective for treating common hand maladies and have a similar complication profile when compared to historical controls from the standard operating room in an ambulatory center or hospital., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

• TKA and TKA is often associated with postoperative pain affecting recovery and rehabilitation. • Avoiding the use of tourniquet may improve postoperative recovery after total knee arthroplasty. • Bleeding is an important consideration after TKA and THA since there are concerns about the side effects and social costs of transfusions. • The efficient management of pain and bleeding is of paramount importance. • Tumescent and walant anaesthesia have been described to reduce bleeding during surgery. • PVI technique provides a satisfactory bloodless surgical field and comparable postoperative analgesia to LIA in TKA and THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to gauge whether patients with preexisting mental health conditions have desirable outcomes when undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery., Methods: A retrospective review of 133 patients who underwent WALANT surgery by 2 senior authors from August 2019 to October 2020 was performed. Patients were administered a 10-question postoperative survey detailing perioperative pain, experience, and satisfaction concerning their procedure. Analysis was performed for patient responses to the questionnaire, demographics, comorbidities, and patient-reported outcomes using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)., Results: There were 61 patients identified as having a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis compared to 70 patients without who underwent WALANT surgery. Comparing psychiatric diagnosis and nonpsychiatric diagnosis cohorts, there was no significant difference in preoperative anxiety (3.75 vs 3.30), pain during procedure (0.67 vs 0.56), or pain after surgery (4.89 vs 4.26). There was a significantly higher pain score with preoperative injection in the psychiatric diagnosis cohort (4.07 vs 2.93). When asked if they would have a WALANT procedure again, 95.1% of patients in the psychiatric diagnosis cohort and 98.6% of patients in the nonpsychiatric diagnosis group said they would. There was no significant difference in average preoperative SANE scores (59.67 [no psych diagnosis] vs 61.70 [psych diagnosis]) or postoperative SANE scores (82.82 [no psych diagnosis] vs 81.06 [psych diagnosis]) between the two cohorts., Conclusions: WALANT surgery was nearly as well tolerated in patients with a preexisting mental health diagnosis when compared to those without a preexisting diagnosis., Clinical Relevance: Surgeons who are currently or potentially performing WALANT surgery should not rule out patients as eligible candidates because of a prior diagnosis of a mental health condition., (© 2024 The Authors.)

The gold-standard for bone, ligament and joint surgery in the wrist is locoregional anesthesia in most countries. Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is commonly used for simple soft-tissue hand surgery procedures such as carpal tunnel or trigger finger release, and can now also be safely used in procedures such as proximal row carpectomy, scapholunate ligament repair or partial wrist fusion, to name but a few. This article describes the use of WALANT for complex surgery in the wrist. WALANT surgery offers many known benefits, such as enhanced patient safety and comfort, simplified perioperative process and avoidance of anesthesia-related risks, and also allows the surgeon to perform intraoperative testing of the repaired structures. Thus, the surgeon can tailor the rehabilitation program and shorten recovery time. We describe detailed guidelines for performing WALANT procedures safely and effectively, making it a favorable option for complex surgeries in the wrist., (Copyright © 2023 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Trigger finger release (TFR) is a common hand surgery, historically performed using a tourniquet. Recently, wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) has gained popularity due to ostensible advantages such as improved patient pain, satisfaction, lower rate of complications, and decreased cost. This systematic review compares outcomes of WALANT for TFR with local anesthesia with a tourniquet (LAWT). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. All English-language peer-reviewed randomized and observational studies assessing TFR in adults were included. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Eleven studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 7 observational) including 1233 patients were identified. In the WALANT group, pain on injection was statistically nonsignificantly lower (mean difference [MD]: -1.69 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -4.14 to 0.76, P = .18) and postoperative pain was statistically lower in 2 studies. Patient and physician satisfaction were higher and analgesic use was lower in WALANT. There were no significant differences between groups for functional outcomes or rates of adverse events. Preoperative time was longer (MD: 26.43 minutes, 95% CI = 15.36 to 37.51, P < .01), operative time similar (MD: -0.59 minutes, 95% CI = -2.37 to 1.20, P = .52), postoperative time shorter (MD: -27.72 minutes, 95% CI = -36.95 to -18.48, P < .01), and cost lower (MD: -52.2%, 95% CI = -79.9% to -24.5%) in WALANT versus LAWT. The GRADE certainty of evidence of these results ranges from very low to low. This systematic review does not confirm superiority of WALANT over LAWT for TFR due to moderate to high risk of bias of included studies; further robust trials must be conducted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

A wide array of intraoperative issues can arise during surgery involving the hand and upper extremity. An understanding of the common pitfalls within hand surgery may help practicing hand surgeons circumvent such issues. Within this manuscript, we first identify problems with the increasingly popular technique of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). Achieving appropriate hemostasis and anesthetic can be bothersome, especially for procedures proximal to the distal palmar crease. We discuss our local anesthetic timing and concentrations to help mitigate such issues, as well as other problems that may arise in WALANT procedures. There also lies a barrier in connecting the traumatized patient to care in the outpatient/ambulatory setting. Additionally, the polytraumatized patient increases the complexity of care coordination for not just the hand surgeon, but all surgical providers involved. The order in which multidisciplinary surgical procedures are performed is influenced by both the complexity of the patient's case as well as the institution's current protocol. All academic institutions are faced with challenges in providing optimal intraoperative education to trainees. We acknowledge that there should be a balance between the attending surgeon executing key portions of the procedure and the trainee gaining the appropriate hands-on experience. This manuscript elaborates on the issues of intraoperative education provided to residents and anecdotal methods that may help overcome such challenges. Resources within hand surgery can often be limited and become particularly problematic in the operative setting. Specific examples include but are not limited to the lack of dedicated teams, inability to obtain appropriate intraoperative imaging, access to appropriate hardware, and intraoperative complications in an ambulatory surgery center setting., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)