Search

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous group of hematological malignancies characterized by differentiation arrest, high relapse rates, and poor survival. The bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is recognized as a critical mediator of drug resistance and a primary site responsible for AML relapse. Our previous study reported that 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAr) induces AML cell differentiation by inhibiting pyrimidine synthesis and activating Checkpoint kinase 1. Although the protective effect of BM stroma on leukemia cells in response to cytotoxic drugs is well-documented, its effect on AML differentiation remains less explored. In this study, we investigated the impact of stromal cell lines and primary mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) on AML cell line differentiation triggered by AICAr and brequinar, a known dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor. Our findings indicate that the mouse MS-5 stromal cell line, known for its cytoprotective effects, does not inhibit AML cell differentiation induced by pyrimidine synthesis inhibitors. Interestingly, AICAr caused morphological changes and growth arrest in MS-5 stromal cells via an AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent pathway. Human stromal cell lines HS-5 and HS-27, as well as primary MSCs isolated from patient bone marrow, were superior in promoting AML differentiation compared with mouse cells in response to AICAr and brequinar, with the inhibitors not significantly affecting the stromal cells themselves. In conclusion, our study highlights the supportive role of human BM MSCs in enhancing the differentiation effects of pyrimidine synthesis inhibitors on AML cells, suggesting that AML treatment strategies focusing on differentiation rather than cell killing may be successful in clinical settings. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to demonstrate that human stromal cell lines and primary mesenchymal stromal cells from patients enhance the in vitro differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells induced by pyrimidine synthesis inhibitors, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAr), and brequinar. Furthermore, this is the first report to show that AICAr affects mouse bone marrow stromal cells by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and that human stromal cells are superior to mouse cells for testing the effects of drugs on AML differentiation.

Background: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a rare complication that can occur after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In patients with membranous nephropathy (MN) who have undergone allogeneic HSCT, a new antigen called protocadherin FAT1 has been identified. Our objective is to present a case series of MN patients after HSCT with a novel antigen-based stratification., Case Presentations: Patients who developed full-blown NS due to MN after an HSCT were enrolled in the University Hospital Centre Zagreb study. The first two patients were treated with an HSCT for acute myeloid leukaemia, and both developed NS after cessation of graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The first patient had reduced kidney function, while the second had completely preserved function. Kidney biopsy showed MN with only subepithelial deposits. A thorough examination revealed that there was no secondary cause of the disease. The patients achieved complete remission after undergoing immunosuppression treatment. The third patient underwent HSCT for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. He developed both acute and chronic GVHD and also experienced avascular hip necrosis. After sixteen years, the patient developed NS with preserved kidney function. The kidney specimen showed membranous nephropathy (MN) with mesangial and subepithelial deposits. Extensive research was conducted, but no secondary cause for the MN was detected. All three cases tested negative for anti-PLA2R antibodies. Biopsy tissue samples were analysed using laser microdissection and tandem mass spectrometry of glomeruli for the detection of different specific antigens. Patients one and two tested positive for FAT1, whereas patient three tested positive for PCSK6., Conclusions: MN can develop at various time intervals after HSCT. Specific antigen testing can help establish the relationship between MN and HSCT. In the future, serum testing for anti-FAT1 antibodies in HSCT patients could be significant in diagnosing FAT1-associated MN, similar to how anti-PLA2R antibodies are significant in diagnosing PLA2R-associated MN., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: We hypothesized that fit older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with decitabine (DEC) would report better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes than those receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC). We conducted a phase 3 randomized trial to compare DEC (10-day schedule) with IC (3+7) in older fit patients with AML. HRQoL was a secondary end point, and it was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in conjunction with its elderly module (EORTC QLQ-ELD14). The following scales were a priori selected for defining the primary end point: physical and role functioning, fatigue, pain, and burden of illness. HRQoL was assessed at baseline, at regeneration from cycle 2, and at 6 and 12 months after randomization, and also before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and 100 days after transplantation. Overall, 606 patients underwent randomization. At 2 months, the risk of HRQoL deterioration was lower in the DEC arm than in the 3+7 arm; 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69-82) vs 88% (95% CI, 82-93); odds ratio, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24-0.76; P = .003). No statistically significant HRQoL differences were observed between treatment arms at the long-term evaluation combining assessments at 6 and 12 months. HRQoL deteriorations between baseline and after allo-HSCT were observed in both arms. However, these deteriorations were not clinically meaningful in patients randomized to DEC, whereas this was the case for those in the 3+7 arm, in 4 of 5 primary HRQoL scales. Our HRQoL findings suggest that lower-intensity treatment with DEC may be preferable to current standard IC (3+7) in fit older patients with AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02172872., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a serious late complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)., Methods: This multicenter analysis determined the cumulative incidence (CI) of cGvHD and late acute GvHD (laGvHD) and its impact on transplantation-related mortality (TRM), relapse (R), and overall survival (OS) in 317 patients [296 adults, 21 pediatrics (<12 years of age)] who underwent their first allo-HSCT in 2017., Results: The CI of laGvHD was 10.5% in adults and 4.8% in pediatrics, and the CI of cGvHD was 43.0% in all adult transplant patients and 50.2% in the adult at-risk cohort at the study end. The onset of cGvHD was de novo in 42.0% of patients, quiescent in 52.1%, and progressive in 5.9%. In adults, prophylactic use of antithymocyte globulin or posttransplant cyclophosphamide was associated with a significantly lower incidence of cGvHD (28.7%) vs. standard prophylaxis with calcineurin inhibitors (30.6%) and methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil (58.4%) (all p  < 0.01). TRM was significantly higher in patients with aGvHD (31.8%) vs. cGvHD (12.6%) and no GvHD (6.3%) (all p  = 0.0001). OS in the adult at-risk cohort was significantly higher in patients with cGvHD (78.9%) vs. without (66.2%; p  = 0.0022; HR 0.48) due to a significantly lower relapse rate (cGvHD: 14.5%; without cGvHD: 27.2%; p  = 0.00016, HR 0.41). OS was also significantly higher in patients with mild (80.0%) and moderate (79.2%) cGvHD vs. without cGvHD (66.2%), excluding severe cGvHD (72.7%) (all p  = 0.0214)., Discussion: The negative impact of severe cGvHD on OS suggests a focus on prevention of severe forms is warranted to improve survival and quality of life., Competing Interests: DW received research funds from Novartis and honoraria from Amgen, Neovii, Novartis, Mallinckrodt, Behring, and Takeda. RV received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, and MSD. AL received honoraria from Novartis. JM received honoraria for participation in an advisory board from Novartis. HG received honoraria for participation in advisory boards and speakers' bureau from Gilead, Novartis, Neovii, Sanofi, Takeda, and Therakos. SG is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. AP received honoraria from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis and Mallinckrodt. DP received honoraria from Novartis and Takeda. LD received honoraria from Novartis and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Langer, Lelas, Rittenschober, Piekarska, Sadowska-Klasa, Sabol, Desnica, Greinix, Dickinson, Inngjerdingen, Lawitschka, Vrhovac, Pulanic, Güneş, Klein, Moritz Middeke, Grube, Edinger, Herr and Wolff.)

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests OP received honoraria or travel support from Gilead, Jazz, Merck, Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Pfizer, and Therakos; received research support from Incyte and Priothera; and is a member of advisory boards to Equillium Bio, Jazz, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, Omeros, Priothera, Sanofi, Shionogi, and SOBI. FP has received travel support and was member of advisory board of GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Roche, and Janssen. HG received honoraria for participation in advisory boards and speakers' bureau from Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Therakos. HS reports having received personal fees from Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, and from the Belgian Hematological Society (BHS); reports research grants from Novartis and the BHS; and has received non-financial support (travel grants) from Gilead, Pfizer, the European Society for Blood and Marrow transplantation and the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Research. MAr is on the advisory board of Neovii and reports research support from Therakos and Roche. NK received honoraria from Kite–Gilead, Jazz, MSD, Neovii Biotech, Novartis, Riemser, Pfizer, BMS; and research support from Neovii, Riemser, Novartis and Deutsche Knochenmarksperderdatei. AS has received honoraria from Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb–Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, Kite–Gilead, Sanofi, Roche, and Alexion; is a consultant to Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb–Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi; and has received research support from Takeda. FB participated in advisory board meetings and received speaker fees from NEOVII, Sanofi, Takeda, and Novartis. SG received honoraria or travel support from Novartis and Janssen, and is member of advisory boards to Novartis and Janssen. ZP received honoraria from Sanofi and Therakos. DW received a research grant from Novartis, and received honoraria from Novartis, Takeda, Mallinckrodt, Sanofi, Incyte, Behring, and NEOVII., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)