Search

Background. Staff shortages in healthcare, especially nurses, are a worldwide problem with negative effects for both nurses and patients. Supporting nurses is important for job motivation and to strengthen connectedness and intention to stay. Extensive research has been performed in the past on managerial support, but this is not the case for coworker support for nurses. Therefore, it is important to gain knowledge about areas of focus of coworker support impacting nurses' motivation to prevent the loss of motivation and turnover. Aim. To provide an overview of the current insights regarding coworker support's impact on nurses' motivation. Evaluation. A review was conducted using three computerized databases, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. A total of 15 studies matched the inclusion criteria (association between nurses' motivation and perceived coworker support and participants fulfilling the role of nurse). Coworker support was one of the main focuses of the included papers. Review Methods. Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) method of the integrative literature review was used, together with the critical appraisal tool by Hawker et al. (2002) to guide the methodological rigor appraisal of the included research studies. Result. Three main themes regarding associations related to the effect of perceived coworker support on nurses were identified, namely, job satisfaction, intention to stay, and stress. Conclusions. This review shows multiple areas of focus where coworker support is important for the perceived support of nurses, with emphasis on job satisfaction, intention to stay, and stress. Support foresees job satisfaction. With the intention to stay, the effect of experienced support is especially seen among the newly qualified nurses, where lack of support increases the likelihood of leaving their jobs prematurely. Experienced support from coworkers also has a stress‐reducing effect. Implications for Nursing Forum. Support from coworkers is essential for nurses, as it has a positive effect on work satisfaction, intention to stay, and stress reduction. It is important to create a work environment that offers room for coworker support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient participation is fundamental in nursing care and has yielded benefits for patient outcomes. However, despite their compassionate care approach, nurses do not always incorporate patients' needs and wish into evidence‐based practice, quality improvement or learning activities. Therefore, a shift to continuous quality improvement based on evidence‐based practice is necessary to enhance the quality of care. The patient's opinion is an essential part of this process. To establish a more sustainable learning culture for evidence‐based quality improvement, it is crucial that nurses learn alongside their patients. However, to promote this, nurses require a deeper understanding of patients' care preferences. Objective: To explore patients' needs and wishes towards being involved in care processes that nurses can use in developing an evidence‐based quality improvement learning culture. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in two hospital departments and one community care team. In total, 18 patients were purposefully selected for individual semi‐structured interviews with an average of 15 min. A framework analysis based on the fundamental of care framework was utilised to analyse the data deductively. In addition, inductive codes were added to patients' experiences beyond the framework. For reporting this study, the SRQR guideline was used. Results: Participants needed a compassionate nurse who established and sustained a trusting relationship. They wanted nurses to be present and actively involved during the care delivery. Shared decision‐making improved when nurses offered fair, clear and tailored information. Mistrust or a disrupted nurse–patient relationship was found to be time‐consuming and challenging to restore. Conclusions: Results confirmed the importance of a durable nurse–patient relationship and showed the consequences of nurses' communication on shared decision‐making. Insights into patients' care preferences are essential to stimulate the development of an evidence‐based quality improvement learning culture within nursing teams and for successful implementation processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS), the set of actions to ensure appropriate antimicrobial use, is increasingly considered a multidisciplinary endeavour. However, it is unclear how Dutch hospital-based nurses envision their contribution to AMS. Objective: To explore the views and visions of Dutch bedside nurses on their role regarding appropriate antimicrobial use. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Fourteen bedside nurses in nine different Dutch hospitals participated. Data were analysed using a thematic content analysis. Results: Nurses considered their role regarding appropriate use of antibiotics as an integral part of their daily nursing practice. They envisioned their future role as an expansion of their current practice, improving or intensifying this contribution. Prompting review of antimicrobial treatment by nurses was seen as regular practice. Ward rounds were considered the best moment to exert their nursing role, by showing leadership in communicating about different aspects of AMS. Patient advocacy ("striving for the best possible care for their patient") appears to be a driver of the nursing contribution. Nurses perceived a shared responsibility with prescribers on certain aspects of the antimicrobial treatment and wished for a clarification of this role. Education and cognitive reminders such as antibiotic checklist to be used in ward rounds, can support the uptake of the nurses' role. Conclusion: Nurses envision their future role in AMS as an enhanced, elaborated and empowered version of their current daily practice. Education, formal acknowledgment and increased awareness of the nursing role, may advance the contributing role nurses already have. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To explore potential areas of low‐value home‐based nursing care practices, their prevalence and related influencing factors of nurses and nursing assistants working in home‐based nursing care. Design: A quantitative, cross‐sectional design. Methods: An online survey with questions containing scaled frequencies on five‐point Likert scales and open questions on possible related influencing factors of low‐value nursing care. The data collection took place from February to April 2022. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to summarize and analyse the results. Results: A nationwide sample of 776 certified nursing assistants, registered nurses and nurse practitioners responded to the survey. The top five most delivered low‐value care practices reported were: (1) 'washing the client with water and soap by default', (2) 'application of zinc cream, powders or pastes when treating intertrigo', (3) 'washing the client from head to toe daily', (4) 're‐use of a urinary catheter bag after removal/disconnection' and (5) 'bladder irrigation to prevent clogging of urinary tract catheter'. The top five related influencing factors reported were: (1) 'a (general) practitioner advices/prescribes it', (2) 'written in the client's care plan', (3) 'client asks for it', (4) 'wanting to offer the client something' and (5) 'it is always done like this in the team'. Higher educational levels and an age above 40 years were associated with a lower provision of low‐value care. Conclusion: According to registered nurses and certified nursing assistants, a number of low‐value nursing practices occurred frequently in home‐based nursing care and they experienced multiple factors that influence the provision of low‐value care such as (lack of) clinical autonomy and handling clients' requests, preferences and demands. The results can be used to serve as a starting point for a multifaceted de‐implementation strategy. Reporting Method: STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies. Patient or Public Contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care: Nursing care is increasingly shifting towards the home environment.Not all nursing care that is provided is effective or efficient and this type of care can therefore be considered of low‐value.Reducing low‐value care and increasing appropriate care will free up time, improve quality of care, work satisfaction, patient safety and contribute to a more sustainable healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundObjectiveDesignMethodsResultsConclusionTransformation of healthcare is necessary to ensure patients receive high-quality care. Working with the evidence-based practice (EBP) principles enables nurses to make this shift. Although working according to these principles is becoming more common, nurses base their actions too much on traditions and intuition. Therefore, to promote EBP in nursing practice and improve related education, more insight into nurses’ needs is necessary to overcome existing EBP barriers.To identify the current needs to work with EBP principles among hospital and community care nurses and student nurses.A qualitative, exploratory approach with focus group discussionsData was collected between February and December 2020 through 5 focus group discussions with 25 nurses and student nurses from a hospital, a community care organisation, and nursing education schools (bachelor and vocational). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and the main themes were synchronised to the seven domains from the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist.Nurses and student nurses experience EBP as complex and require more EBP knowledge and reliable, ready-to-use evidence. They wanted to be facilitated in access to evidence, the opportunity to share insights with colleagues and more time to work on EBP. The fulfilment of these needs serves to enhance motivation to engage with evidence-based practice (EBP), facilitate personal development, and empower nurses and student nurses to take more leadership in working according to EBP principles and improve healthcare delivery.Nurses experience difficulties applying EBP principles and need support with their implementation. Nurses’ and student nurses’ needs include obtaining more EBP knowledge and access to tailored and ready-to-use information. They also indicated the need for role models, autonomy, incentives, dedicated time, and incorporation of EBP in daily work practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Design Methods Results Conclusion Impact Report Method Patient or Public Contribution To develop a reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants to support the implementation of the Dutch Informal Care guideline in daily care.Design‐based research.A design group and four test groups of community nurses and nursing assistants were formed to develop a reflection method that aligns with the needs and preferences of its end‐users. The design and test group meetings were video recorded. The video data were iteratively discussed and analysed thematically to adapt and refine the method and to identify its key features.A final reflection method was developed. Five main themes were identified from the analysis: the group, reflective triggers, knowledge about the guidelines, the coach and preconditions. The themes are linked to nine key features representing the building blocks of the reflection method. The key features are group size, participants with different (educational) backgrounds, pairs of participants, expressing thoughts, video feedback, reflection game, making the connection with the guideline, coaching as a process facilitator and meeting organizational and contextual conditions for implementation.An evidence‐ and practice‐based reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants is developed to support the implementation. By involving community nurses and certified nursing assistants, the method closely matches their needs and preferences. Critical elements of the reflection method are a game element, video feedback and working in pairs in a group of participants from different (educational) backgrounds. Guidance is needed to make the transfer from theory to practice.A reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants was developed to enhance care work according to guideline recommendations, aiming to improve the care provided by informal caregivers.The COREQ guideline was used.This reflection method was developed in close collaboration with all stakeholders during the entire study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Quality improvements (QIs) in dynamic and complex health care contexts require resilience and take variability into account in quality improvement. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) helps us understand resilience and gain insight into (un)desirable variability in the complex system of daily practice. We explored how using FRAM in the Deming cycle of a QI project can help professionals and researchers learn from, reflect upon, and improve complex processes. We used FRAM in a Dutch hospital to study a QI: Critical Care Outreach Service (CCOS)., Methods: The aim was to use FRAM before and after implementation to create a FRAM model and reflect to health care professionals the mismatch between Work As Imagined (WAI) and Work As Done (WAD). The WAI FRAM model was co-created with professionals before the implementation of CCOS. We used descriptions of tasks and processes for ICU nurses and verified them in 30-minute semistructured interviews (N = 2). WAD was created by input of semistructured interviews with key professionals in CCOS (N = 21) and 3 nonparticipant observations of trained CCOS nurses. We validated WAD in 2 dialogue sessions with key professionals (N = 11). Data collection continued until saturation., Results: Juxtaposing the WAI and WAD models showed that WAD contained additional functions and highlighted unexpectedly complex functions. Reflecting on the application of FRAM with health care professionals revealed opportunities and challenges, especially time investment., Conclusions: FRAM helps professionals outline processes and tasks (WAI), learn from, and reflect upon their daily practice (WAD). FRAM models help professionals identify variability proactively to improve practices that enhance resilient performance., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)