1. Appropriateness guidelines for inferior vena cava filter utilization: A contemporary review.
- Author
-
Banks CA and Passman MA
- Subjects
- Humans, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Prosthesis Implantation standards, Clinical Decision-Making, Evidence-Based Medicine standards, Venous Thrombosis therapy, Venous Thrombosis prevention & control, Risk Assessment, Prosthesis Design, Venous Thromboembolism prevention & control, Vena Cava Filters standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic standards
- Abstract
Concern regarding the exponential increase in optional utilization of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in the early 2000s with a persistent low retrieval rate nationwide has resulted in increased scrutiny regarding clinical application of IVCFs. IVCFs are used in a variety of clinical scenarios, ranging from thromboembolic protection in patients with deep venous thrombosis and contraindication to anticoagulation to prophylactic deployment in multitrauma and critically ill patients. Evidence supporting IVCFs as mechanical thromboembolic protection in certain clinical scenarios has been established through evidenced-based guidelines. As an adjunct to evidence-based guidelines, appropriateness criteria to address specific clinical scenarios and facilitate clinical decision making when considering placement of an IVCF have been developed. In this review, current evidence-based and appropriateness guidelines are summarized., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF