Search

Abstract Here, we present a new method for evaluating questions on chemical reactions in the context of remote education. This method can be used when binary grading is not sufficient as some tolerance may be acceptable. In order to determine a grade, the developed workflow uses the pairwise similarity assessment of two considered reactions, each encoded by a single molecular graph with the help of the Condensed Graph of Reaction (CGR) approach. This workflow is part of the ChemMoodle project and is implemented as a Moodle Plugin. It uses the Chemdoodle engine for reaction drawing and visualization and communicates with a REST server calculating the similarity score using ISIDA fragment descriptors. The plugin is open-source, accessible in GitHub ( https://github.com/Laboratoire-de-Chemoinformatique/moodle-qtype_reacsimilarity ) and on the Moodle plugin store ( https://moodle.org/plugins/qtype_reacsimilarity?lang=en ). Both similarity measures and fragmentation can be configured. Scientific contribution This work introduces an open-source method for evaluating chemical reaction questions within Moodle using the CGR approach. Our contribution provides a nuanced grading mechanism that accommodates acceptable tolerances in reaction assessments, enhancing the accuracy and flexibility of the grading process.

Abstract Accurate prediction of thermodynamic solubility by machine learning remains a challenge. Recent models often display good performances, but their reliability may be deceiving when used prospectively. This study investigates the origins of these discrepancies, following three directions: a historical perspective, an analysis of the aqueous solubility dataverse and data quality. We investigated over 20 years of published solubility datasets and models, highlighting overlooked datasets and the overlaps between popular sets. We benchmarked recently published models on a novel curated solubility dataset and report poor performances. We also propose a workflow to cure aqueous solubility data aiming at producing useful models for bench chemist. Our results demonstrate that some state-of-the-art models are not ready for public usage because they lack a well-defined applicability domain and overlook historical data sources. We report the impact of factors influencing the utility of the models: interlaboratory standard deviation, ionic state of the solute and data sources. The herein obtained models, and quality-assessed datasets are publicly available.

Abstract The cutaneous absorption parameters of xenobiotics are crucial for the development of drugs and cosmetics, as well as for assessing environmental and occupational chemical risks. Despite the great variability in the design of experimental conditions due to uncertain international guidelines, datasets like HuskinDB have been created to report skin absorption endpoints. This review updates available skin permeability data by rigorously compiling research published between 2012 and 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been selected to build the most harmonized and reusable dataset possible. The Generative Topographic Mapping method was applied to the present dataset and compared to HuskinDB to monitor the progress in skin permeability research and locate chemotypes of particular concern. The open-source dataset (SkinPiX) includes steady-state flux, maximum flux, lag time and permeability coefficient results for the substances tested, as well as relevant information on experimental parameters that can impact the data. It can be used to extract subsets of data for comparisons and to build predictive models.

Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a global healthcare threat. To decrease the spread of AMR and associated mortality, methods for rapid selection of optimal antibiotic treatment are urgently needed. Machine learning (ML) models based on genomic data to predict resistant phenotypes can serve as a fast screening tool prior to phenotypic testing. Nonetheless, many existing ML methods lack interpretability. Therefore, we present a methodology for visualization of sequence space and AMR prediction based on the non‐linear dimensionality reduction method – generative topographic mapping (GTM). This approach, applied to AMR data of >5000 S. aureus isolates retrieved from the PATRIC database, yielded GTM models with reasonable accuracy for all drugs (balanced accuracy values ≥0.75). The Generative Topographic Maps (GTMs) represent data in the form of illustrative maps of the genomic space and allow for antibiotic‐wise comparison of resistant phenotypes. The maps were also found to be useful for the analysis of genetic determinants responsible for drug resistance. Overall, the GTM‐based methodology is a useful tool for both the illustrative exploration of the genomic sequence space and AMR prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kinetic aqueous or buffer solubility is important parameter measuring suitability of compounds for high throughput assays in early drug discovery while thermodynamic solubility is reserved for later stages of drug discovery and development. Kinetic solubility is also considered to have low inter‐laboratory reproducibility because of its sensitivity to protocol parameters [1]. Presumably, this is why little efforts have been put to build QSPR models for kinetic in comparison to thermodynamic aqueous solubility. Here, we investigate the reproducibility and modelability of kinetic solubility assays. We first analyzed the relationship between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data, and then examined the consistency of data from different kinetic assays. In this contribution, we report differences between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data that are consistent with those reported by others [1, 2] and good agreement between data from different kinetic solubility campaigns in contrast to general expectations. The latter is confirmed by achieving high performing QSPR models trained on merged kinetic solubility datasets. The poor performance of QSPR model trained on thermodynamic solubility when applied to kinetic solubility dataset reinforces the conclusion that kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities do not correlate: one cannot be used as an ersatz for the other. This encourages for building predictive models for kinetic solubility. The kinetic solubility QSPR model developed in this study is freely accessible through the Predictor web service of the Laboratory of Chemoinformatics (https://chematlas.chimie.unistra.fr/cgi‐bin/predictor2.cgi). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Molecules are complex dynamic objects that can exist in different molecular forms (conformations, tautomers, stereoisomers, protonation states, etc.) and often it is not known which molecular form is responsible for observed physicochemical and biological properties of a given molecule. This raises the problem of the selection of the correct molecular form for machine learning modeling of target properties. The same problem is common to biological molecules (RNA, DNA, proteins)—long sequences where only key segments, which often cannot be located precisely, are involved in biological functions. Multi‐instance machine learning (MIL) is an efficient approach for solving problems where objects under study cannot be uniquely represented by a single instance, but rather by a set of multiple alternative instances. Multi‐instance learning was formalized in 1997 and motivated by the problem of conformation selection in drug activity prediction tasks. Since then MIL has found a lot of applications in various domains, such as information retrieval, computer vision, signal processing, bankruptcy prediction, and so on. In the given review we describe the MIL framework and its applications to the tasks associated with ambiguity in the representation of small and biological molecules in chemoinformatics and bioinformatics. We have collected examples that demonstrate the advantages of MIL over the traditional single‐instance learning (SIL) approach. Special attention was paid to the ability of MIL models to identify key instances responsible for a modeling property. This article is categorized under:Data Science > ChemoinformaticsData Science > Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dimensionality reduction is an important exploratory data analysis method that allows high-dimensional data to be represented in a human-interpretable lower-dimensional space. It is extensively applied in the analysis of chemical libraries, where chemical structure data - represented as high-dimensional feature vectors-are transformed into 2D or 3D chemical space maps. In this paper, commonly used dimensionality reduction techniques - Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), and Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM) - are evaluated in terms of neighborhood preservation and visualization capability of sets of small molecules from the ChEMBL database., (© 2024 The Author(s). Molecular Informatics published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Visualization and analysis of large chemical reaction networks become rather challenging when conventional graph-based approaches are used. As an alternative, we propose to use the chemical cartography ("chemography") approach, describing the data distribution on a 2-dimensional map. Here, the Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM) algorithm - an advanced chemography approach - has been applied to visualize the reaction path network of a simplified Wilkinson's catalyst-catalyzed hydrogenation containing some 10 5 structures generated with the help of the Artificial Force Induced Reaction (AFIR) method using either Density Functional Theory or Neural Network Potential (NNP) for potential energy surface calculations. Using new atoms permutation invariant 3D descriptors for structure encoding, we've demonstrated that GTM possesses the abilities to cluster structures that share the same 2D representation, to visualize potential energy surface, to provide an insight on the reaction path exploration as a function of time and to compare reaction path networks obtained with different methods of energy assessment., (© 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)