Search

Introduction: Alcohol use is common in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We examined the impact of alcohol use on direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy outcome and the clinical course of liver disease and 2‐year survival for patients receiving HCV DAA therapy. Methods: Adults (n = 2624) recruited from 26 Australian hospital liver clinics during 2016–2021 were followed up for 2 years. Risky alcohol use was defined by a combination of self‐report (≥40 g/day of ethanol), physician‐reported history of problematic alcohol use, and anti‐craving medication prescription via population‐based database linkage. We examined factors associated with advanced liver fibrosis and survival using multivariable logistic and Cox regression. Results: Among 1634 patients (62.3%) with risky alcohol use, 24.6% reported consuming ≥40 g/day of alcohol, 98.3% physician‐reported problematic alcohol use; only 4.1% were dispensed naltrexone/acamprosate. One hundred and forty‐three patients with cirrhosis reported ≥40 g/day of alcohol, 6 (4.3%) were prescribed naltrexone/acamprosate. Risky alcohol use was associated with advanced fibrosis (adjusted‐odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.32–2.17) and patients were over‐represented for cirrhosis (45.1% vs. 25.6% in no‐risky alcohol use [p < 0.001]) and hepatocellular carcinoma (5.7% vs. 2.5% [p < 0.001]). Sustained viral response (p = 0.319) and 2‐year survival (adjusted‐hazard ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 0.84–4.63) after DAA therapy were not associated with risky alcohol use. Discussion and Conclusions: Risky alcohol use in HCV patients was prevalent, but did not reduce HCV cure. Treatment for alcohol dependence was low. Risky alcohol use may be under‐recognised in liver clinics. Better integration of addiction medicine into liver services and increased resourcing and addiction medicine training opportunities for hepatologists may help address this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic morbidity. We compared the incidence of cancers in adults admitted to Queensland hospitals with MASLD with that for the Queensland population and examined the association between cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes and the development of extrahepatic cancers. Methods: In this retrospective study, we identified all cancers (Queensland Cancer Registry) after the first hospitalization with MASLD during Jul‐2007 to Dec‐2019, estimated age‐standardized incidence (ASI) of cancers, and compared that with the ASI in the Queensland population (incidence rate ratios [IRR]). Among the MASLD cohort, we examined the association between diabetes and cancer risk (Cox regression). Median follow‐up was 3.8 years (54 204 person‐years). Results: Totally 1104 new cancers were diagnosed in 1018 patients (8.9% of 9771 non‐cirrhotic and 1712 adults with cirrhosis). The ASI (all cancers) of 1668.2 per 100 000 person‐years in men (95% CI 1523.7–1827.4) and 1284.0 per 100 000 person‐years in women (95% CI 1169.6–1408.2) was 2‐fold higher than that of the Queensland population (IRR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.75–2.16 and IRR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.78–2.22, respectively). Incidence of stomach cancer, unknown primary, and pancreas was 3‐ to 5‐fold higher compared to the general population (all P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis of the MASLD cohort, older age (e.g. ≥70 years adjusted hazard ratio [adj‐HR] = 4.59, 95% CI 3.61–5.83), male gender (adj‐HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.37), and cirrhosis (adj‐HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.11–1.70) were independently associated with extrahepatic cancer risk, while diabetes was not. Conclusions: Our findings will help to raise awareness among clinicians about the importance of cancer vigilance in this patient group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) lead to excellent rates of sustained virological response (SVR). However, loss to follow‐up (LTFU) for SVR testing remains a challenge. We examine factors associated with LTFU in a real‐world setting. Methods: Adults who received DAA therapy for HCV in one of 26 centers across Australia during 2016–2021 were followed up for 2 years. Data sources included the patient medical records and the national Pharmaceutical and Medicare Benefits Schemes. Linkage to Medicare provided utilization data of other health‐care providers and re‐treatment with DAAs. LTFU was defined as no clinic attendance for SVR testing by at least 52 weeks after DAA treatment commencement. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with LTFU. Results: In 3619 patients included in the study (mean age 52.0 years; SD = 10.5), 33.6% had cirrhosis (69.4% Child–Pugh class B/C), and 19.3% had HCV treatment prior to the DAA era. Five hundred and fifteen patients (14.2%) were LTFU. HCV treatment initiation in 2017 or later (adj‐OR = 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–3.54), younger age (adj‐OR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.80–3.84), Indigenous identification (adj‐OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.23–3.21), current injection drug use or opioid replacement therapy (adj‐OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.25–2.20), depression treatment (adj‐OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.17–1.90), and male gender (adj‐OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.66) were associated with LTFU. Conclusions: These findings stress the importance of strengthening the network of providers caring for patients with HCV. In particular, services targeting vulnerable groups of patients such as First Nations Peoples, youth health, and those with addiction and mental health disorders should be equipped to treat HCV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although clinical guidelines endorse screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with advanced fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the feasibility of and barriers and considerations relevant to implementing this approach in the community remain unclear., Methods: Sequential adults with T2D attending selected community clinics during 2021-2023 were invited to receive a "liver health check" (n=543). A further 95 participants were referred directly from their general practitioner (GP) or self-referred to the study. A total of 302 participants underwent a point of care assessment of hepatic steatosis and stiffness (FibroScan) and were advised to see their GP to discuss the results. "Template" letters containing key results, their interpretation and advice about management of cardiometabolic risk, patient follow-up and referral criteria, were sent to participants' GPs., Results: Referral to a tertiary liver clinic was advised in GP letters for 45 (15%) participants with an increased risk of clinically significant fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement ≥8), 15 participants with 'red flags' (eg splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia) and 2 with unsuccessful FibroScan examinations. A referral from GPs to the liver clinic was received for 27 (44%) of these 62 participants. Approximately 90% of GPs rated the "template" letters favourably on a Likert rating scale., Conclusion: The low rate of participation in the "liver health check" and liver clinic referral reflects a real-world scenario and may stem from societal under-recognition and engagement with MASLD, competing health priorities or under-appreciation of the link between liver fibrosis severity and mortality risk. Further studies need to address strategies to enhance participation in liver health assessments and determine their impact on liver-related morbidity/mortality and overall survival., Competing Interests: There are no financial disclosures. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the manuscript., (© 2024 Gracen et al.)