Search

Objective: To describe our own approach using buccal mucosal grafting and to assess the outcome of this approach., Materials and Methods: A total of 42 patients underwent ventral onlay BMG by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2022. A longitudinal incision along the length of the urethra was made through the anterior vaginal wall and the periurethral fascia was incised to create 2 flaps. This ventral urethrotomy ran from the meatus into the proximal healthy urethra above the level of the stricture. A buccal mucosal graft was harvested and sutured to the margins of the urethral mucosa itself and the flaps of periurethral fascia. The vaginal wall was then closed., Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.6 ± 12.8 years. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, 41 patients (98%) were stricture-free. Peak flow rate improved from a mean of 7.7 ± 3.2 mL/s preoperatively to 25.9 ± 5.9 mL/s postoperatively. No patient developed incontinence. One patient developed a recurrent urethral stricture which was treated by redo urethroplasty., Conclusion: The surgical technique applied has proved efficiency. The ventral BMG preserves the urethral sphincter and so avoids postoperative incontinence. The use of periurethral fascia represents a good vascular and mechanical support for the graft., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Treatments against urogenital cancers frequently have fertility side-effects. The strategy to preserve fertility after oncologic treatments is still a matter of debate with a lack of evidence and international guidelines. The aim of this study is to investigate fertility preservation practices before urogenital cancer treatments and to compare national habits., Material and Methods: An online anonymous survey was submitted from January to June 2021 to six European urological societies. The 31-items questionnaire included questions about demography, habits of evaluation, and management of fertility preservation in case of urogenital cancer treatments., Results: Two hundred twenty-eight urologists from six urological societies in five different countries (Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Finland) filled out the survey. Three quarter (74%; n = 166) usually propose a cryopreservation before orchidectomy. In case of oligo/azoo-spermia, the technique performed for the sperm extraction during orchidectomy varies among the sample: 70.5% (n = 160) of the responders do not perform a Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) nor a Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (PESA). The cryopreservation for prostate cancer treatments is never proposed in 48.17% (n = 105) of responders but conversely it is always proposed in 5.05% (n = 11). The cryopreservation before bladder cancer treatments is not commonly proposed (67.5%, n = 154)., Conclusion: Our study showed variable country specific tendencies in terms of fertility preservation in the period of treatment of urological cancers. These differences seem to be related to national guidelines recommendations. Standardization of international guidelines is urgently needed in the field of fertility for urological cancer patients., (© 2024 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.)