Search

Objectives  Pituitary tumor treatment is hampered by the relative rarity of the disease, absence of a multicenter collaborative platform, and limited translational-clinical research partnerships. Prior studies offer limited insight into the formation of a multicenter consortium. Design  The authors describe the establishment of a multicenter research initiative, Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID), to encourage quality improvement and research, promote scholarship, and apply innovative solutions in outcomes research. Methods  The challenges encountered during the formation of other research registries were reviewed with those lessons applied to the development of RAPID. Setting/Participants  RAPID was formed by 11 academic U.S. pituitary centers. Results  A Steering Committee, bylaws, data coordination center, and leadership team have been established. Clinical modules with standardized data fields for nonfunctioning adenoma, prolactinoma, acromegaly, Cushings disease, craniopharyngioma, and Rathkes cleft cyst were created using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based platform. Currently, RAPID has received institutional review board approval at all centers, compiled retrospective data and agreements from most centers, and begun prospective data collection at one site. Existing institutional databases are being mapped to one central repository. Conclusion  The RAPID consortium has laid the foundation for a multicenter collaboration to facilitate pituitary tumor and surgical research. We sought to share our experiences so that other groups also contemplating this approach may benefit. Future studies may include outcomes benchmarking, clinically annotated biobank tissue, multicenter outcomes studies, prospective intervention studies, translational research, and health economics studies focused on value-based care questions.

This article discusses the establishment of a national pituitary surgical research platform called RAPID, which aims to improve patient care and surgical outcomes for pituitary disorders. The initial focus of the collaboration is on Cushing's disease. The study provides an overview of the patient cohort, surgical outcomes, and lays the foundation for future research. The data collected from nine academic pituitary centers shows that 528 patients with Cushing's disease were treated by 26 neurosurgeons from 2003 to 2023. The report highlights insights into surgical outcomes and disease recurrence rates across different surgeons and environments. The collaboration is expected to advance the standard of care for patients with pituitary disorders. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Objectives: Despite growing interest in how patient frailty affects outcomes (eg, in neuro-oncology), its role after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease (CD) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of frailty on CD outcomes using the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) data set from a collaboration of US academic pituitary centers., Methods: Data on consecutive surgically treated patients with CD (2011-2023) were compiled using the 11-factor modified frailty index. Patients were classified as fit (score, 0-1), managing well (score, 2-3), and mildly frail (score, 4-5). Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine outcomes., Results: Data were analyzed for 318 patients (193 fit, 113 managing well, 12 mildly frail). Compared with fit and managing well patients, mildly frail patients were older (mean ± SD 39.7 ± 14.2 and 48.9 ± 12.2 vs 49.4 ± 8.9 years, P < .001) but did not different by sex, race, and other factors. They had significantly longer hospitalizations (3.7 ± 2.0 and 4.5 ± 3.5 vs 5.3 ± 3.5 days, P = .02), even after multivariable analysis (β = 1.01, P = .007) adjusted for known predictors of prolonged hospitalization (age, Knosp grade, surgeon experience, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, complications, frailty). Patients with mild frailty were more commonly discharged to skilled nursing facilities (0.5% [1/192] and 4.5% [5/112] vs 25% [3/12], P < .001). Most patients underwent gross total resection (84.4% [163/193] and 79.6% [90/113] vs 83% [10/12]). No difference in overall complications was observed; however, venous thromboembolism was more common in mildly frail (8%, 1/12) than in fit (0.5%, 1/193) and managing well (2.7%, 3/113) patients (P = .04). No difference was found in 90-day readmission rates., Conclusion: These results demonstrate that mild frailty predicts CD surgical outcomes and may inform preoperative risk stratification. Frailty-influenced outcomes other than age and tumor characteristics may be useful for prognostication. Future studies can help identify strategies to reduce disease burden for frail patients with hypercortisolemia., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)