Search

Objectives: Cochlear implantation is the most effective treatment for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Much scientific work has been published since their inception. There is a need for a critical reflection on how and what we publish on cochlear implantation. Methods: All Science Citation Index Expanded featured articles between 1980 and 2022 with the word 'cochlear implants' or 'cochlear implantation' were collected from the Web of Science database. Separate characteristics, such as the publication dates, the journals, the number of citations, the countries of origin, the authors, the institutions and co-occurring keywords, were assessed. Results: 13,934 articles were included in the data analysis. The journals of of Otology and Neurotology, Ear and Hearing and of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology represent the top three most publishing journals. Hannover Medical School, the University of Melbourne and the University of Northern Iowa represent the top three most publishing institutions. Discussion: The amount of scientific publications on cochlear implant technology has increased for the last 40 years. Besides the focus on speech perception, the research landscape on cochlear implantation is broad and diverse. The number of countries and institutions contributing to these publications is limited. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis serves as a quantitative overview of the research landscape on cochlear implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundAims/ObjectivesMaterial and methodsResultsConclusions and significanceIn cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice.The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when.We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing.We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. GJB2 testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative GJB2 test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for GJB2 variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening.A common approach is to perform cCMV and GJB2 testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) is to access the inner ear with minimal trauma. High-resolution imaging, empowered with a highly accurate navigation system can enable the planning of a direct keyhole drilling trajectory toward the inner ear. The time has come to (re)define the ideal trajectory into the inner ear with robot-assisted tools that can drill with the highest accuracy. The trajectories of past RACIS procedures were analysed to gain insight into how to calculate the most ideal trajectory and to determine which trajectory parameters influence the course of the procedure. Data-analysis was performed on three groups of previously performed RACIS-procedures. Group 1 included the RACIS-procedures with a round window (RW) approach. Group 2 included the RACIS-procedures with difficulty entering the inner ear. Group 3 included the converted cases to conventional CI surgery due to inadequate intra-operative safety margins. The RW diameter was significantly smaller and its orientation significantly less favourable in group 2 compared to group 1. A smaller surface size and an unfavourable orientation of the RW in relation to the drilling trajectory are thus associated with a more difficult electrode array insertion in RACIS. Both must be taken into account when planning a drilling trajectory into the inner ear., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)