Search

Background Despite studies confirming that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present with dyslipidaemia, the associations between IBD and the serum lipid profile have not been determined. The present study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between the serum lipid profile and IBD risk and elucidate the nature of the interactions between them.Methods Two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was performed to investigate the causal links between total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A (Apo A), apolipoprotein B (Apo B) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and IBD. The study was carried out using the R TwoSampleMR and Mendelian randomisation packages.Results All MR methods, including the weighted median, weighted mode, inverse-variance weighted model, MR-PRESSO, contamination mixture and MR Egger, supported a null causal relationship between TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, Apo A, Apo B and Lp(a) and between IBD, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Null causal effects of lipid indices on IBD were validated through independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS), indicating that the findings are robust.Conclusion Our findings suggest that none of the seven lipid indices may be a potential risk factor for the onset of IBD. However, additional research is needed since our MR analyses cannot assess the potential non-linear causal relationship between serum lipids and IBD.

AimThis study aimed to examine the association of liver enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT), with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk, particularly their dose-response relationship.MethodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled participants aged >20 years old who underwent physical examination at our local hospital from November 2022 to May 2023. A generalized additive model (GAM) was fit to assess the dose-response relationship between liver enzymes and T2D risk. Furthermore, data from the UK Biobank (n=217,533) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2011-2018; n= 15,528) were analyzed to evaluate whether the dose-response relationship between liver enzymes and T2D differed by population differences.ResultsA total of 14,100 participants were included (1,155 individuals with T2D and 12,945 individuals without diabetes) in the analysis. GAM revealed a non-linear relationship between liver enzymes and T2D risk (Pnon-linear < 0.001). Specifically, T2D risk increased with increasing ALT and GGT levels (range, 50 IU/L. Elevated AST within a certain range (range, 35 IU/L) became a risk factor for T2D. The UK Biobank and NHANES data analysis also showed a similar non-linear pattern between liver enzymes and T2D incidence.ConclusionLiver enzymes were non–linearly associated with T2D risk in different populations, including China, the UK, and the US. Elevated ALT and GGT levels, within a certain range, could increase T2D risk. More attention should be given to liver enzyme levels for early lifestyle intervention and early T2D prevention. Further studies are necessary to explore the mechanism of the non-linear association between liver enzymes and T2D risk.

Epidemiological studies have shown that the levels of serum adipokine such as leptin and resistin are associated with the risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nevertheless, whether either leptin or resistin has causal impacts on the risk of SLE is still unknown. In this study, two-sample univariable MR analyses and multivariable MR analysis were performed to explore the causal relationships between adipokines and SLE. Additionally, the potential causal effects of SLE on major adipokines were evaluated using reverse MR analyses. The results of inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode and MR‒Egger methods concordantly supported that major adipokines have no causal effects on the risk of SLE. In the multivariable MR IVW analysis with leptin and resistin as covariates, neither leptin (odds ratio (OR) = 3.093, P = 0.067) nor resistin (OR = 0.477, P = 0.311) was identified as an independent risk factor for SLE, which is in line with the univariable MR results. In conclusion, our analyses revealed no evidence to support that these three major adipokines are risk factors for SLE.

BackgroundObservational studies have demonstrated an association between white blood cells (WBC) subtypes and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. However, it is unknown whether this relationship is causal. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal effect of WBC subtypes on T2D and glycemic traits.MethodsThe summary data for neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts were extracted from a recent genome-wide association study (n = 173,480). The DIAGRAM and MAGIC consortia offered summary data pertaining to T2D and glycemic characteristics, including fasting glucose (FG) (n = 133,010), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (n = 46,368), and homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (n = 37,037). A series of MR analyses (univariable MR, multivariable MR, and reverse MR) were used to investigate the causal association of different WBC subtypes with T2D and glycemic traits.ResultsUsing the inverse-variance weighted method, we found one standard deviation increases in genetically determined neutrophil [odd ratio (OR): 1.086, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.877-1.345], lymphocyte [0.878 (0.766-1.006)], monocyte [1.010 (0.906-1.127)], eosinophil [0.995 (0.867-1.142)], and basophil [0.960 (0.763-1.207)] were not causally associated with T2D risk. These findings were consistent with the results of three pleiotropy robust methods (MR-Egger, weighted median, and mode-based estimator) and multivariable MR analyses. Reverse MR analysis provided no evidence for the reverse causation of T2D on WBC subtypes. The null causal effects of WBC subtypes on FG, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR were also identified.ConclusionsWBCs play no causal role in the development of insulin resistance and T2D. The observed association between these factors may be explained by residual confounding.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has a poor prognosis. Circadian genes such as TIMELESS have been associated with several pathologies, including cancer. The expression of TIMELESS and the relationship between TIMELESS, infiltration of tumors and prognosis in LUAD requires further investigation. In this study, we investigated the expression of TIMELESS and its association with survival across several types of human cancer using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression Program. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) regulating overexpression of TIMELESS in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were explored with expression, correlation, and survival analyses. Immune cell infiltration and biomarkers were analyzed between different TIMELESS expression levels. The relationship between TIMELESS expression and immunophenoscores, which were used to predict response to immunotherapy, was evaluated. TIMELESS was identified as a potential oncogene in LUAD. NcRNA analysis showed MIR4435-2HG/hsa-miR-1-3p may interact with TIMELESS in a competitive endogenous RNA network in LUAD tumor tissues. Most immune cells were significantly decreased in TCGA LUAD tumor tissues with high TIMELESS expression except for CD4+T cells and Th2 cells. TIMELESS expression in LUAD tumor tissues was significantly negatively correlated with neutrophil biomarkers, dendritic cell biomarkers (HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, CD1C) and an immunophenoscore that predicted outcomes associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. These findings imply that ncRNAs-mediated TIMELESS overexpression in LUAD tumor tissues correlated with poor prognosis, reduced immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, and poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.