Search

Objectives: Working Alliance (WA) is important in the care of patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD). This study aims to determine which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with WA, as assessed by patients and staff members in Residential Facilities (RFs), and may predict WA dyads' discrepancies. Methods: Three hundred and three SSD patients and 165 healthcare workers were recruited from 98 RFs and characterized for sociodemographic features. WA was rated by the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) for patients (WAIP) and staff members (WAI- T). SSD patients were assessed for the severity of psychopathology and psychosocial functioning. Results: Pearson's correlation revealed a positive correlation (ρ = .314; p < .001) between WAI- P and WAI- T ratings. Linear regression showed that patients with higher education reported lower WAI- P ratings (β = -.50, p = .044), while not being engaged in work or study was associated with lower WAI- T scores (β = -4.17, p = .015). A shorter lifetime hospitalization was associated with higher WAI- P ratings (β = 5.90, p = .008), while higher psychopathology severity negatively predicted WAI- T (β = -.10, p = .002) and WAI- P ratings (β = -.19, p < .001). Better functioning level positively foresaw WAI- T (β = .14, p < .001) and WAI- P ratings (β = .12, p < .001). Regarding discrepancies, staff members' age was associated with higher dyads discrepancy in Total scale and Agreement subscale scores, which were also associated with more severe negative symptoms, while patients' age was negatively correlated to Relationship subscale discrepancy. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the factors that influence WA in SSD patients and health workers in RFs. The findings address interventions to improve WA and ultimately patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Positivity (POS) indicates the proclivity to see life and experiences in a positive light. There is limited research on its effects on individuals with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD). Very little is known about the relationship between POS and daily activities in people with SSD. Aim: The study aims to compare the POS rated by patients with SSD with those obtained in an Italian normative sample matched by age and sex and to use the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to investigate the association between POS and daily time use (i.e. productive activities, leisure activities), functioning and mood in individuals with SSD. Method: 620 SSD patients were recruited from mental health services in Italy as part of the DiAPAson project. POS, symptom severity, functioning, and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. POS scores were compared to a normative sample of 5,002 Italian citizens. Additionally, a subset of 102 patients underwent 7-day assessments using mobile EMA. Results: People with SSD did not significantly differ from the Italian normative sample in POS levels (0.035, p =.190). POS showed a significant inverse association with support network (−0.586, p =.036) and symptomatology (BPRS −0.101; 95% p <.001; BNSS B = −0.113, p <.001). A significant direct association was found between POS and QoL (B = 0.310, p <.001) and functioning (B = 0.058, p <.001). In the subsample using EMA, POS ratings showed significant associations with Positive Emotions (B = 0.167, p <.001) and Negative Emotions (B = −0.201, p <.001). Conclusion: People with SSD exhibited comparable levels of POS to the normative sample. Higher POS was linked to better functioning, QoL, fewer severe symptoms, and increased positive emotions. However, it did not relate to increased productivity or engagement in leisure activities. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between POS and time use in individuals with SSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evaluating emotional experiences in the life of people with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) is fundamental for developing interventions aimed at promoting well‐being in specific times and contexts. However, little is known about emotional variability in this population. In DiAPAson project, we evaluated between‐ and within‐person differences in emotional intensity, variability, and instability between people with SSD and healthy controls, and the association with psychiatric severity and levels of functioning. Methods: 102 individuals diagnosed with SSD (57 residential patients, 46 outpatients) and 112 healthy controls were thoroughly evaluated. Daily emotions were prospectively assessed with Experience Sampling Method eight times a day for a week. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, correlations, and generalized linear models. Results: Participants with SSD, and especially residential patients, had a higher intensity of negative emotions when compared to controls. Moreover, all people with SSD reported a greater between‐person‐variability of both positive and negative emotions and greater intra‐variability of negative emotions than healthy controls. In addition, the emotion variability in people with SSD does not follow a linear or quadratic trend but is more "chaotic" if compared to controls. Conclusions: Adequate assessments of positive and negative emotional experiences and their time course in people with SSD can assist mental health professionals with well‐being assessment, implementing targeted interventions through the identification of patterns, triggers, and potential predictors of emotional states. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The work and teaching of Franco Basaglia - Italian psychiatrist and neurologist - has shown that it is possible to respond to the needs of people with mental health and addiction problems without applying restrictive measures, or resorting to large depersonalizing institutions, but in a welfare system whose keywords are community, proximity, home care, integrated approach. Today, however, the challenge is on training, where the current contribution of the university does not seem sufficient. There are many skills that require adequate training: from the development of personalized therapeutic-rehabilitative pathways aimed at pursuing goals of capacitation and social inclusion (and not only pharmacological containment of symptoms), to the clinical and psychosocial management of complex cases; from the relationship between psychiatry and justice for offenders with psychiatric disorders, to the relationship with the social policies of local authorities for social and health integration activities.