1. Short- and long-term immunosuppressive effects of melanoma influence the prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node status.
- Author
-
DeTemple VK, Ritter C, Srinivas N, Spassova I, Gambichler T, Hüning S, Gräger N, Gutzmer R, Bröcker EB, Ugurel S, Schrama D, and Becker JC
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Aged, Adult, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Time Factors, Neoplasm Micrometastasis, Melanoma immunology, Melanoma pathology, Sentinel Lymph Node pathology, Sentinel Lymph Node immunology, Skin Neoplasms immunology, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Lymphatic Metastasis
- Abstract
Background: Presence of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is currently used to assess prognosis of melanoma patients. The immunoactivity within the SLN is known to be influenced by the primary tumor (PT), which may in turn impact the SLNs' metastatic state., Aim: We characterize the temporal dependence and underlying mechanisms of the immunological effects of the PT on the SLN., Methods: The prognostic value of SLN state as a function of PT removal time was evaluated. To put the results into a functional context, selected PTs and corresponding SLNs were analyzed for gene and protein expression patterns., Results: In a cohort of 202 patients with known distant metastasis and similar PT prognostic characteristics, SLNs removed before or within one week after the PT (IM-SLN) had a higher incidence of micrometastases than those removed at least one week after the PT (DEL-SLN). The immunoactivity in IM-SLN was found to be lower than in DEL-SLN. Specifically, in IM-SLNs, T helper 17 / regulatory T-cells were predominant, whereas in DEL-SLNs, cytotoxic γδT-cells were more frequent. The higher immune activity in DEL-SLNs was probably facilitated by CD209
+ antigen-presenting cells. Indeed, in PT with high TGFβ expression CD209+ cells appear to be trapped and no increased immunoactivity was observed in DEL-SLN., Conclusions: Presence of micrometastases in DEL-SLNs have a higher negative prognostic value as in IM-SLNs since they indicate not only a melanoma's propensity to metastasize, but possibly also its capacity to escape immune responses., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. VKD received a research grant, honoraria for talks and travel support from SUN Pharma. CR is employed by Merck Serono. TG reports receiving speakers and/or advisory board honoraria from BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Roche, Abbvie, Almirall, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. SH has acted as a consultant and / or received travel assistance from BMS, Kyowa Kirin. RG received honoraria as speaker from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Almirall Hermal, SUN, Sanofi, Pierre-Fabre, as advisory board member from BMS, Novartis, Almirall Hermal, MSD, Amgen, SUN, Sanofi, Pierre-Fabre, 4SC, MerckSerono, Pfizer, Immunocore, Delcath, for meeting support from SUN, Pierre-Fabre, Boehringer Ingelheim and for research projects (to institution) from Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Merck-Serono, SUN Pharma, Sanofi, Kyowa-Kirin, Admiral-Hermal. SU declares research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Serono; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Roche, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pierre Fabre. JCB is receiving speaker’s bureau honoraria from Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma, is a paid consultant/advisory board member/DSMB member for Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, ICON, MerckSerono, Pfizer, and Sanofi. His group receives research grants from Merck Serono, IQVIA, and Alcedis. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF