Search

Background: Treatment of patients with low-grade and high-grade gliomas is highly variable due to the large difference in survival expectancy. New non-invasive tools are needed for risk stratification prior to treatment. The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is expressed in several cancers, associated with poor prognosis and may be non-invasively imaged using uPAR-PET. We aimed to investigate the uptake of the uPAR-PET tracer [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-AE105 in primary gliomas and establish its prognostic value regarding overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, we analyzed the proportion of uPAR-PET positive tumors to estimate the potential number of candidates for future uPAR-PRRT. Methods: In a prospective phase II clinical trial, 24 patients suspected of primary glioma underwent a dynamic 60-min PET/MRI following the administration of approximately 200 MBq (range: 83–222 MBq) [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-AE105. Lesions were considered uPAR positive if the tumor-to-background ratio, calculated as the ratio of TumorSUVmax-to-Normal-BrainSUVmean tumor-SUVmax-to-background-SUVmean, was ≥ 2.0. The patients were followed over time to assess OS and PFS and stratified into high and low uPAR expression groups based on TumorSUVmax. Results: Of the 24 patients, 16 (67%) were diagnosed with WHO grade 4 gliomas, 6 (25%) with grade 3, and 2 (8%) with grade 2. Two-thirds of all patients (67%) presented with uPAR positive lesions and 94% grade 4 gliomas. At median follow up of 18.8 (2.1–45.6) months, 19 patients had disease progression and 14 had died. uPAR expression dichotomized into high and low, revealed significant worse prognosis for the high uPAR group for OS and PFS with HR of 14.3 (95% CI, 1.8-112.3; P = 0.011), and HR of 26.5 (95% CI, 3.3–214.0; P = 0.0021), respectively. uPAR expression as a continuous variable was associated with worse prognosis for OS and PFS with HR of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5–4.8; P = 0.0012), and HR of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5–4.2; P = 0.00073), respectively. Conclusions: The majority of glioma patients and almost all with grade 4 gliomas displayed uPAR positive lesions underlining the feasibility of 68Ga-NOTA-AE105 PET/MRI in gliomas. High uPAR expression is significantly correlated with worse survival outcomes for patients. Additionally, the high proportion of uPAR positive gliomas underscores the potential of uPAR-targeted radionuclide therapy in these patients. Trail Registration: EudraCT No: 2016-002417-21; the Scientific Ethics Committee: H-16,035,303; the Danish Data Protection Agency: 2012-58-0004; clinical trials registry: NCT02945826, 26Oct2016, URL: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02945826. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hyperlactatemia is common during tumor craniotomy, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear. This study measured simultaneous arterial and jugular‐bulb lactate concentrations in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy to investigate the hypothesis that hyperlactatemia was associated with a net cerebrovascular lactate input. In 20 patients, arterial and jugular‐bulb blood was collected hourly from the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively for measurement of lactate, glucose, and oxygen concentration. For each marker, data were analyzed using a linear mixed‐effects model with jugular‐bulb concentration as dependent variable, arterial concentration as fixed effect, and patient as random effect. Furthermore, we generated regression lines between arterial and jugular‐bulb concentrations. The slope of the regression line between arterial and jugular‐bulb lactate was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.97, R2 = 0.98), indicating that increasing arterial lactate levels were associated with an increasingly positive net cerebrovascular balance (net input). The line crossed the identity line at 2.86 (95% CI 0.57–5.16) mmol/L, indicating that lower levels of lactate were associated with a negative net cerebrovascular balance (net output). This suggests a switch from net lactate output during normolactatemia towards net input during hyperlactatemia. Hyperlactatemia in tumor‐craniotomy patients probably does not originate from the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This Danish cohort study aims to (1) compare patterns of care (POC) and survival of patients with multifocal glioblastoma (mGBM) to those with unifocal glioblastoma (uGBM), and (2) explore the association of patient-related factors with treatment assignment and prognosis, respectively, in the subgroup of mGBM patients. Methods Data on all adults with newly diagnosed, pathology-confirmed GBM between 2015 and 2019 were extracted from the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. To compare POC and survival of mGBM to uGBM, we applied multivariable logistic and Cox regression analysis, respectively. To analyze the association of patient-related factors with treatment assignment and prognosis, we established multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. Results In this cohort of 1343 patients, 231 had mGBM. Of those, 42% underwent tumor resection and 41% were assigned to long-course chemoradiotherapy. Compared to uGBM, mGBM patients less often underwent a partial (odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2–0.6), near-total (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.07–0.2), and complete resection (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.07–0.2) versus biopsy. mGBM patients were furthermore less often assigned to long-course chemoradiotherapy (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.97). Median overall survival was 7.0 (95% CI 5.7–8.3) months for mGBM patients, and multifocality was an independent poor prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5). In mGBM patients, initial performance, O[6]-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promotor methylation status, and extent of resection were significantly associated with survival. Conclusions Patients with mGBM were treated with an overall less intensive approach. Multifocality was a poor prognostic factor for survival with a moderate effect. Prognostic factors for patients with mGBM were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The reliability of near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for measuring cerebral oxygenation (ScO2) is controversial due to the possible contamination from extracranial tissues. We compared ScO2 measured with the NIRS optode on the forehead, the skull and the dura mater in anaesthetised patients undergoing craniotomy. We hypothesised that ScO2 measured directly on the skull and the dura mater would differ from ScO2 measured on the skin. Methods: This prospective observational study included 17 adult patients scheduled for elective craniotomy. After induction of general anaesthesia, ScO2 was measured on the forehead skin, as well as on the skull and on the dura mater in the surgical field. The primary comparison was the difference in ScO2 measured on the dura mater and on ScO2 measured on the skin; secondary comparisons were the differences in ScO2 on the skull and ScO2 on the skin and the dura mater, respectively. Data were described with median (5%–95% range) and analysed with the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results: ScO2 values on the dura mater were obtained in 11 patients, and median ScO2 (48%, 29%–95%) did not differ significantly from ScO2 on the skin (73%, 49%–92%; p =.052), median difference −25% (−35.6% to −1.2%). ScO2 on the skull (N = 16) was lower than that on the skin (63% [43%–79%] vs. 75% [61%–94%]; p =.0002), median difference −10% (−20.8 to −3.0). Conclusion: In adults undergoing craniotomy, NIRS‐based ScO2 measured on the dura mater did not reach statistically significantly lower values than ScO2 measured on the skin, whereas values on the skull were lower than on the skin, indicating a contribution from scalp tissue to the signal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of patients with low-grade and high-grade gliomas is highly variable due to the large difference in survival expectancy. New non-invasive tools are needed for risk stratification prior to treatment. The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is expressed in several cancers, associated with poor prognosis and may be non-invasively imaged using uPAR-PET. We aimed to investigate the uptake of the uPAR-PET tracer [ 68 Ga]Ga-NOTA-AE105 in primary gliomas and establish its prognostic value regarding overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, we analyzed the proportion of uPAR-PET positive tumors to estimate the potential number of candidates for future uPAR-PRRT., Methods: In a prospective phase II clinical trial, 24 patients suspected of primary glioma underwent a dynamic 60-min PET/MRI following the administration of approximately 200 MBq (range: 83-222 MBq) [ 68 Ga]Ga-NOTA-AE105. Lesions were considered uPAR positive if the tumor-to-background ratio, calculated as the ratio of TumorSUVmax-to-Normal-BrainSUVmean tumor-SUVmax-to-background-SUVmean, was ≥ 2.0. The patients were followed over time to assess OS and PFS and stratified into high and low uPAR expression groups based on TumorSUVmax., Results: Of the 24 patients, 16 (67%) were diagnosed with WHO grade 4 gliomas, 6 (25%) with grade 3, and 2 (8%) with grade 2. Two-thirds of all patients (67%) presented with uPAR positive lesions and 94% grade 4 gliomas. At median follow up of 18.8 (2.1-45.6) months, 19 patients had disease progression and 14 had died. uPAR expression dichotomized into high and low, revealed significant worse prognosis for the high uPAR group for OS and PFS with HR of 14.3 (95% CI, 1.8-112.3; P = 0.011), and HR of 26.5 (95% CI, 3.3-214.0; P = 0.0021), respectively. uPAR expression as a continuous variable was associated with worse prognosis for OS and PFS with HR of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P = 0.0012), and HR of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5-4.2; P = 0.00073), respectively., Conclusions: The majority of glioma patients and almost all with grade 4 gliomas displayed uPAR positive lesions underlining the feasibility of 68 Ga-NOTA-AE105 PET/MRI in gliomas. High uPAR expression is significantly correlated with worse survival outcomes for patients. Additionally, the high proportion of uPAR positive gliomas underscores the potential of uPAR-targeted radionuclide therapy in these patients., Trail Registration: EudraCT No: 2016-002417-21; the Scientific Ethics Committee: H-16,035,303; the Danish Data Protection Agency: 2012-58-0004; clinical trials registry: NCT02945826, 26Oct2016, URL: https://classic., Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT02945826 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)