Search

Atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular disease. Its prevalence increases with aging. However, atherosclerosis may also affect young subjects without significant exposure to the classical risk factors. Recent evidence indicates clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) as a novel cardiovascular risk factor that should be suspected in young patients. CHIP represents a link between impaired bone marrow and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis may present with an acute symptomatic manifestation or subclinical events that favor plaque growth. The outcome of a plaque relies on a balance of innate and environmental factors. These factors can influence the processes that initiate and propagate acute plaque destabilization leading to intraluminal thrombus formation or subclinical vessel healing. Thirty years ago, the first autopsy study revealed that coronary plaques can undergo rupture even in subjects without a known cardiovascular history. Nowadays, cardiac magnetic resonance studies demonstrate that this phenomenon is not rare. Myocardial infarction is mainly due to plaque rupture and plaque erosion that have different pathophysiological mechanisms. Plaque erosion carries a better prognosis as compared to plaque rupture. Thus, a tailored conservative treatment has been proposed and some studies demonstrated it to be safe. On the contrary, plaque rupture is typically associated with inflammation and anti-inflammatory treatments have been proposed in response to persistently elevate biomarkers of systemic inflammation. In conclusion, atherosclerosis may present in different forms or phenotypes. Vulnerable patient phenotypes, identified by using intravascular imaging techniques, biomarkers, or even genetic analyses, are characterized by distinctive pathophysiological mechanisms. These different phenotypes merit tailored management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the ongoing global pandemic, and the continuous emergence of novel variants threatens fragile populations, such as immunocompromised patients. This subgroup of patients seems to be seriously affected by intrahost viral changes, as the pathogens, which are keen to cause replication inefficiency, affect the impaired immune system, preventing efficient clearance of the virus. Therefore, these patients may represent an optimal reservoir for the development of new circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. The following study aimed to investigate genomic changes in SARS-CoV-2-positive immunocompromised patients over time., Methods: SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at different time points for each patient (patient A and patient B), extracted and then analyzed through next-generation sequencing (NGS). The resulting sequences were examined to determine mutation frequencies, describing viral evolution over time., Case Presentation: Patient A was a 53-year-old patient with onco-hematological disease with prolonged infection lasting for 51 days from May 28th to July 18th, 2022. Three confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive samples were collected on May 28th, June 15th and July 4th. Patient B was 75 years old and had onco-hematological disease with prolonged infection lasting for 146 days. Two confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples were collected at the following time points: May 21st and August 18th., Conclusion: Heat map construction provided evidence of gain and/or loss of mutations over time for both patients, suggesting within-host genomic evolution of the virus. In addition, mutation polymorphisms and changes in the SARS-CoV-2 lineage were observed in Patient B. Sequence analysis revealed high mutational pattern variability, reflecting the high complexity of viral replication dynamics in fragile patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events (RCE). Non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure are the main causes of RCEs. We sought to identify the incidence and predictors of RCEs., Methods: Eight hundred thirty patients with STEMI were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. All patients underwent blood test analysis at hospital admission, at 1-month and at 12-month follow-up times. Patients were divided into RCE group and control group. RCE group was further categorized into non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure subgroups., Results: Among 830 patients with STEMI, 63 patients had a RCE (7.6%). At hospital admission, HDL was numerically lower in RCE group, while LDL at both 1-month and 12-month follow-up times were significantly higher in RCE group. Both HDL at hospital admission and LDL at 12-month follow-up were independently associated with RCEs (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99 and OR 1.041, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, respectively). RCEs were due to non-culprit plaque progression in 47.6% of cases, while in 36.5% due to stent failure. The mean time frame between pPCI and RCE was significantly greater for non-culprit plaque progression subgroup as compared to stent failure subgroup (27 ± 18 months and 16 ± 14 months, P  = 0.032)., Conclusion: RCEs still affect patients after pPCI. Low levels of HDL at admission and high levels of LDL at 12 months after pPCI significantly predicted RCEs. A RCE results in non-culprit plaque progression presents much later than an event due to stent failure., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Heart failure (HF) is a growing issue in developed countries; it is often the result of underlying processes such as ischemia, hypertension, infiltrative diseases or even genetic abnormalities. The great majority of the affected patients present a reduced ejection fraction (≤40%), thereby falling under the name of "heart failure with reduced ejection fraction" (HFrEF). This condition represents a major threat for patients: it significantly affects life quality and carries an enormous burden on the whole healthcare system due to its high management costs. In the last decade, new medical treatments and devices have been developed in order to reduce HF hospitalizations and improve prognosis while reducing the overall mortality rate. Pharmacological therapy has significantly changed our perspective of this disease thanks to its ability of restoring ventricular function and reducing symptom severity, even in some dramatic contexts with an extensively diseased myocardium. Notably, medical therapy can sometimes be ineffective, and a tailored integration with device technologies is of pivotal importance. Not by chance, in recent years, cardiac implantable devices witnessed a significant improvement, thereby providing an irreplaceable resource for the management of HF. Some devices have the ability of assessing (CardioMEMS) or treating (ultrafiltration) fluid retention, while others recognize and treat life-threatening arrhythmias, even for a limited time frame (wearable cardioverter defibrillator). The present review article gives a comprehensive overview of the most recent and important findings that need to be considered in patients affected by HFrEF. Both novel medical treatments and devices are presented and discussed., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.