Search

Key content: The perinatal period confers an elevated risk of both relapses and new onset of mental illness. Suboptimal treatment can have a profound impact on maternal mortality and morbidity, neonatal outcomes and longer term child development.Most psychotropic medication can be used safely in pregnancy, with some notable exceptions.While decisions on the use of psychotropic medications in pregnancy are often complex and should be multidisciplinary, it is imperative that obstetricians and gynaecologists familiarise themselves with current literature to provide evidence‐based counselling and care.Existing guidelines on the use of psychotropic medication are largely aimed at psychiatrists, and to date there has been a lack of concise, digestible information with a focus on core knowledge for obstetricians and gynaecologists.We summarise existing evidence on the use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers and sedatives in the perinatal period. For each drug class we describe the teratogenicity, impact on pregnancy, breastfeeding and the newborn. Learning objectives: To be familiar with common psychotropic medication used in pregnancy and the postpartum period.To understand key evidence on the safety profile of psychiatric medication in the perinatal period and apply this to individualised counselling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To create a sensorised surgical glove that can accurately identify obstetric anal sphincter injury to facilitate timely repair, reduce complications and aid training. Design: Proof‐of‐concept. Setting: Laboratory. Sample: Pig models. Methods: Flexible triboelectric pressure/force sensors were mounted onto the fingertips of a routine surgical glove. The sensors produce a current when rubbed on materials of different characteristics which can be analysed. A per rectum examination was performed on the intact sphincter of pig cadavers, analogous to routine examination for obstetric anal sphincter injuries postpartum. An anal sphincter defect was created by cutting through the vaginal mucosa and into the external anal sphincter using a scalpel. The sphincter was then re‐examined. Data and signals were interpreted. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the glove in detecting anal sphincter injury. Results: In all, 200 examinations were performed. The sensors detected anal sphincter injuries in a pig model with sensitivities between 98% and 100% and a specificity of 100%. The current produced when examining an intact sphincter and sphincter with a defect was significantly different (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this preliminary study, the sensorised glove accurately detected anal sphincter injury in a pig model. Future plans include its clinical translation, starting with an in‐human study on postpartum women, to determine whether it can accurately detect different types of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Methods Results Conclusion To evaluate the accuracy of combined models of maternal biophysical factors, ultrasound, and biochemical markers for predicting stillbirths.A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women undergoing first‐trimester pre‐eclampsia screening at 11–13 gestational weeks was conducted. Maternal characteristics and history, mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) ultrasound, maternal ophthalmic peak ratio Doppler, and placental growth factor (PlGF) serum were collected during the visit. Stillbirth was classified as placental dysfunction‐related when it occurred with pre‐eclampsia or birth weight <10th percentile. Combined prediction models were developed from significant variables in stillbirths, placental dysfunction‐related, and controls. We used the area under the receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity based on a specific cutoff to evaluate the model's predictive performance by measuring the capacity to distinguish between stillbirths and live births.There were 13 (0.79%) cases of stillbirth in 1643 women included in the analysis. The combination of maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI, and PlGF, significantly contributed to the prediction of stillbirth. This model was a good predictor for all (including controls) types of stillbirth (AUC 0.879, 95% CI: 0.799–0.959, sensitivity of 99.3%, specificity of 38.5%), and an excellent predictor for placental dysfunction‐related stillbirth (AUC 0.984, 95% CI: 0.960–1.000, sensitivity of 98.5, specificity of 85.7).Screening at 11–13 weeks' gestation by combining maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI, and PlGF, can predict a high proportion of stillbirths. Our model has good accuracy for predicting stillbirths, predominantly placental dysfunction‐related stillbirths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To create a sensorised surgical glove that can accurately identify obstetric anal sphincter injury to facilitate timely repair, reduce complications and aid training., Design: Proof-of-concept., Setting: Laboratory., Sample: Pig models., Methods: Flexible triboelectric pressure/force sensors were mounted onto the fingertips of a routine surgical glove. The sensors produce a current when rubbed on materials of different characteristics which can be analysed. A per rectum examination was performed on the intact sphincter of pig cadavers, analogous to routine examination for obstetric anal sphincter injuries postpartum. An anal sphincter defect was created by cutting through the vaginal mucosa and into the external anal sphincter using a scalpel. The sphincter was then re-examined. Data and signals were interpreted., Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the glove in detecting anal sphincter injury., Results: In all, 200 examinations were performed. The sensors detected anal sphincter injuries in a pig model with sensitivities between 98% and 100% and a specificity of 100%. The current produced when examining an intact sphincter and sphincter with a defect was significantly different (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In this preliminary study, the sensorised glove accurately detected anal sphincter injury in a pig model. Future plans include its clinical translation, starting with an in-human study on postpartum women, to determine whether it can accurately detect different types of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vivo., (© 2024 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)