Search

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is little evidence supporting its use in older adults. Low-dose daily carboplatin combined with thoracic radiotherapy is considered a standard regimen for this population. To establish a simple and feasible carboplatin administration method, we conducted a study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for older adults with locally advanced NSCLC., Methods: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial included patients aged ≥75 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients received chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions plus concurrent weekly carboplatin at an area under curve of 2 mg mL -1  min -1 ). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: From July 2020 to June 2022, 37 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The ORR was 63.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6-77.5). Median PFS was 14.6 months (95% CI = 9.1-18.1). Median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI = 17.4-not reached). Grade 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in one patient (2.8%) each., Conclusion: Weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy was safe in older adults with locally advanced NSCLC, and promising activity was observed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Thoracic Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less invasive than surgery. However, differences in lifetime costs and patient outcomes remain unclear. In this study, a cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared with surgery for Japanese patients with operable stage I NSCLC was conducted., Methods and Materials: A partitioned survival model was constructed using each treatment arm's overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data. The data for the SBRT arm were extracted from the Japanese multicenter cohort study, which enrolled 678 medically operable patients with stage I NSCLC, and patient registry data were used for the surgery arm. The 5-year OS rate was 78.2% for SBRT and 74.8% for surgery from both studies. The 5-year PFS rate was 57.0% for SBRT and 63.4% for surgery. The quality of life values of PFS and progressive disease were obtained from domestic and overseas literature (PFS: 0.74, progressive disease: 0.65). The time horizon was set to 10 years. The expected costs and quality-adjusted life years for each treatment group were calculated. All costs are expressed in Japanese yen converted to US dollars (USD)., Results: SBRT was the dominant strategy, reducing treatment costs by 4,443.8 USD and increasing quality-adjusted life years by 0.131 compared with surgery. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of SBRT being dominant and cost-effective was 50.6% and 72.4%, respectively. Under the budget impact analysis, the total savings for the patients with stage I NSCLC in Japan was 6,252,870.0 USD (n = 1,407)., Conclusions: SBRT is a more cost-effective option than surgery in patients with medically operable stage I NSCLC in Japan. Large-scale epidemiologic studies that reflect the latest clinical realities, such as OS/PFS, will be needed to validate this study's robustness., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: To investigate the toxicity and survival outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer who are eligible for lobectomy., Materials and Methods: This multicenter nationwide prospective cohort study included patients with operable early-stage lung cancer. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy was performed according to the schedule stipulated in the unified treatment policy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated., Results: A total of 274 patients were enrolled and included in efficacy and safety analyses. The most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (44 %), while 105 cases (38 %) were not histologically confirmed or diagnosed clinically. Overall, 250 (91 %) of the 274 patients had tumors that were peripherally situated, while 138 (50 %) and 136 (50 %) patients were treated by proton and carbon ion radiotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 42.8 months (IQR 36.7-49.0). Grade 3 or severe treatment-related toxicity was observed in 4 cases (1.5 %). Three-year PFS was 80.5 % (95 % CI: 75.7 %-85.5 %) and OS was 92.5 % (95 % CI: 89.3 %-95.8 %). Pathological confirmation and clinical stage were factors significantly associated with PFS, while tumor location and particle-ion type were not. Meanwhile, clinical stage was significantly associated with OS, but pathological confirmation, tumor location, and particle-ion type were not., Conclusions: Particle therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer resulted in excellent 3-year OS and PFS in each subset. In this disease context, proton and carbon ion beam therapies are feasible alternatives to curative surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that would directly affect the research reported in this paper. Hideyuki Harada received Honoraria from Astrazeneca, Accuray, Chugai pharmaceutical, Takeda pharmaceutical, MSD, Eizai pharmaceutical, Phizer, Brainlab, Hitachi, Novartis, Guerbet Japan, GE Healthcare, Nihon Medi-Physics and Taiho pharmaceutical outside this work. Keita Mori received Honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo and Eli Lilly Japan outside this work. Hitoshi Ishikawa received Honoraria from Boston Scientific Corporation and MSD outside this work. Masaki Nakamura received Honoraria from Astrazeneca outside this work. Nobuteru Kubo received Honoraria from Astrazeneca outside this work. Miyako Satouchi received Honoraria from Chugai pharmaceutical, Astrazeneca,Eli Lilly Japan, Ono pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck Janssen Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Taiho pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Takeda pharmaceutical, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Japan and Bayer pharmaceutical and research funding from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Taiho pharmaceutical, Ono pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Eisai outside this work. Yoshiyuki Shioyama received Honoraria from Astrazeneca outside this work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The standard therapy for stage I NSCLC is surgery, but some operable patients refuse this option and instead undergo radiotherapy. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a type of radiotherapy. The Japanese prospective nationwide registry study on CIRT began in 2016. Here, we analyzed real-world clinical outcomes of CIRT for operable patients with stage I NSCLC., Methods: All patients with operable stage I NSCLC treated with CIRT in Japan between 2016 and 2018 were enrolled. The dose fractionations for CIRT were selected from several options approved by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. CIRT was delivered to the primary tumor, not to lymph nodes., Results: The median follow-up period was 56 months. Among 136 patients, 117 (86%) had clinical stage IA NSCLC and 19 (14%) had clinical stage IB NSCLC. There were 50 patients (37%) diagnosed clinically without having been diagnosed histologically. Most tumors (97%) were located in the periphery. The 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, progression-free survival, and local control rate were 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.1-89.2), 91.2% (95% CI: 86.0-96.8), 65.9% (95% CI: 58.2-74.6), and 95.8% (95% CI: 92.3-99.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age as a significant factor for overall survival (p = 0.018), whereas age and consolidation/tumor ratio (p = 0.010 and p = 0.004) were significant factors for progression-free survival. There was no grade 4 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in one patient., Conclusions: This study reports the long-term outcomes of CIRT for operable NSCLC in the real world. CIRT for operable patients has been found to have favorable outcomes, with tolerable toxicity., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study presents the surgical and oncological outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) after carbon ion radiotherapy at a single institution., Methods: Patients who underwent salvage RARP for local recurrence after carbon ion radiotherapy at Kyushu University Hospital between 2020 and 2023 were included. A single surgeon performed salvage RARP with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected and electronically recorded., Results: Ten cases were included. The preoperative clinical T-stage was T2, except for one case with T3a. The median console time was 171 min (range, 135-226 min). No severe perioperative or postoperative complications were noted. The pathological T-stage was T2, T3a, and T3b in four, four, and two cases, respectively. Biochemical recurrence was observed in one patient at 31.2 months after surgery. For patients with more than 1 year of follow-up, urinary continence recovery with ≤1 pad was achieved in two cases within 1 year, whereas four cases did not recover urinary continence within 1 year., Conclusions: This case series demonstrated the feasibility of salvage RARP after carbon ion radiotherapy. Although the urinary continence recovery was modest, short-term disease control was favorable., (© 2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)