Search

Objectives: To develop and assess the validity of a novel allergy‐specific domain for the 22‐item sino‐nasal outcomes test (SNOT‐22), to provide a new tool that efficiently quantifies the impact of allergic rhinitis (AR) concurrent with chronic rhinosinusitis. Study Design: Prospective validation study. Setting: Tertiary care hospital and community‐based clinic. Methods: Proposed items were developed based on clinician and patient input, and further assessed via factor analysis and for internal consistency (n = 1987). Items were then additionally assessed for convergent and discriminant validity (n = 415), applying data from concurrent completions of the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness Scale (NOSE), Mini‐Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality‐of‐Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ), and validated global health assessments. Assessments of intra‐rater reliability, responsiveness to change, and qualitative input were also performed. Results: Factor analysis demonstrated that proposed allergy items mapped to a single domain. Items were internally consistent (Cronbach α: 0.80 within domain, 0.91 within all SNOT). In assessments of convergent validity, domain scores were associated with MiniRQLQ (Spearman's ρ: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30‐0.59) and NOSE scores (0.36, 95% CI: 0.27‐0.44). The novel items also discriminated among clinical states: a 1‐point increase in domain score was associated with an 8.32 (95% CI: 5.43‐12.75) increase in the odds of prompting a visit for allergy‐related symptoms and a 1.52 (95% CI: 1.13‐2.05) increase in the odds of positive allergy testing. Intra‐rater reliability was substantial (Cohen's κ: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.8‐0.9), and responsiveness to change was demonstrated (mean difference: −0.6, 95% CI: −0.8 to −0.4). Conclusions: This novel domain is a valid, efficient measure of AR alongside rhinosinusitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Although patient-reported outcomes provide valuable insights, these subjective data may not align with objective test results. Hearing loss is a pervasive problem, such that concordance between subjective perceptions of hearing ability and objective audiogram assessments would be beneficial., Objectives: To determine (1) whether psychological status is an effect modifier of the association between subjective patient reports of hearing ability and objective audiometry results, and (2) whether any effect modification observed in standard static questionnaires would be either mitigated or exacerbated by adaptive testing based on Item Response Theory analyses., Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study at a tertiary care center and community-based practice included consecutive adults who presented with queries related to hearing loss. Participants were recruited and enrolled and data analyses occurred from 2022 to 2024., Exposures: Participants prospectively reported their hearing-specific abilities through either a standard static or adaptive version of the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) scale, alongside validated measures of their mental health and audiometry. Word recognition scores (WRS) and pure tone averages (PTA) were used to analyze audiometric testing., Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between subjective Inner EAR results and audiometry was evaluated. Stratified analyses were used to assess for effect modification by psychological status. The results of standard static and adaptive testing were compared., Results: In this study of 395 patients (mean [range] age, 55.9 [18-89] years; 210 [53.2%] female), standard static Inner EAR mean scores were appropriately higher in patients with higher (better) WRS (50.7, 95% CI, 46.4-54.9), compared with patients with lower (worse) WRS (34.7, 95% CI, 24.3-45.1). However, among patients with worse mental health, there was no association between standard static Inner EAR scores and WRS. In contrast, adaptive Inner EAR mean scores were significantly higher for those with better WRS, regardless of mental health status. Thus, effect modification was observed in standard static assessments, whereas adaptive testing remained durably associated with audiometry, regardless of mental health., Conclusions and Relevance: Psychological status was an effect modifier of the association between standard Inner EAR scale scores and audiometry, with a positive association observed only in those with better mental health. Adaptive testing scores, however, remained significantly associated with audiometry, even when mental status was worse. Adaptive testing may stabilize the association between subjective and objective hearing outcomes.

Objectives: Silk-hyaluronic acid (silk-HA) is a novel vocal fold augmentation material used in humans since July 2020. We aim to describe indications, voice outcomes, and longevity data for silk-HA injectable when used for vocal fold injection (VFI) augmentation in a large cohort of patients with longer-term follow-up than preliminary clinical studies., Methods: Retrospective chart review of Silk-HA injections for glottic insufficiency (GI) and follow-up between July 2020 and November 2023. Subject demographics, diagnoses, volume of material injected, VHI-10 data, time from injection, need for reinjection, and complications were collected. Blinded perceptual voice analysis of randomly selected pre- and post-intervention voice samples for unilateral vocal fold paralysis patients was performed by three voice-specialized speech-language pathologists, and changes in VHI-10 determined at various time intervals up to 1year and beyond., Results: A total of 160 silk-HA injection procedures were performed: 59% female, with a mean age of 66± 13 (range 21-90) years. Ninety-four subjects had unilateral paralysis (58.4%); the remainder had scar, atrophy, paresis, or a combination thereof. Mean volume of silk-HA injected was 0.24± 0.14 cc. Major complications were rare, most notable for laryngoscopic evidence of hemilaryngeal edema (n = 6, 3.8%), with a readmission rate to hospital of 1.3% (n = 2). There was a statistically significant decrease in paired ΔVHI-10 and CAPE-V ratings for each of the postoperative follow-up intervals. A total of 24 (27.2%) repeat medialization procedures were recommended following silk-HA injection for unilateral paralysis., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that silk-HA is a safe product for VFI augmentation, and effective injectable for the treatment of GI due to unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Based on the current data, it is reasonable to counsel patients that they should expect benefit for several months following the injection. If patients reach 1year from their injection with a stable and satisfactory outcome, the majority experience ongoing benefit without need for additional procedures, however, the final duration of clinical effect appears to be years, but it is yet to be determined., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)