Search

Diffusion cells play a crucial role in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic fields by assessing the release and permeation of active pharmaceutical ingredients across membranes. However, commercially available glass-based devices, such as Franz diffusion cells, are expensive and fragile. The emergence of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology enables the creation of diffusion cells with cost-effective polymeric materials and resins, offering exceptional precision and custom geometries. Nonetheless, there are challenges associated with interactions between 3D printing materials and drug molecules. This work aimed to develop inert coatings for 3D-printed diffusion models. Diffusion devices were designed and 3D-printed with a stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer, and different coatings were applied. Then, two model drugs were used to evaluate drug retention by coated devices. Among the tested coatings, one of them showed great potential in preventing drug retention and was selected for subsequent experiments with different drugs and conditions. Finally, voriconazole eyedrops were used to confirm the viability of 3D-printed Franz diffusion cells as a drug release diffusion model. The favourable results obtained with the coating promote the use of 3D printing as a cost-effective manufacturing technology, capable of producing diffusion cells tailored to specific study requirements., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite the high success rates of dental implants, peri-implantitis is currently the most common complication in dental implantology. Peri-implantitis has an inflammatory nature, it is associated with the accumulation of plaque in the peri-implant tissues, and its evolution can be progressive depending on various factors, comorbidities, and poor oral health. Prophylaxis and different treatment methods have been widely discussed in recent decades, and surgical and non-surgical techniques present both advantages and disadvantages. In this work, a literature review of different studies on the application of adjuvant treatments, such as local and systemic antibiotics and antiseptic treatments, was conducted. Positive outcomes have been found in the short (up to one year after treatment) and long term (up to ten years after treatment) with combined therapies. However, there is still a need to explore new therapies based on the use of advanced drug delivery systems for the effective treatment of peri-implantitis in the long term and without relapses. Hence, micro- and nanoparticles, implants, and injectable hydrogels, among others, should be considered in future peri-implantitis treatment with the aim of enhancing overall therapy outcomes.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is revolutionising the way that medicines are manufactured today, paving the way towards more personalised medicine. However, there is limited in vivo data on 3D printed dosage forms, and no studies to date have been performed investigating the intestinal behaviour of these drug products in humans, hindering the complete translation of 3D printed medications into clinical practice. Furthermore, it is unknown whether conventional in vitro release tests can accurately predict the in vivo performance of 3D printed formulations in humans. In this study, selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing technology has been used to produce two placebo torus-shaped tablets (printlets) using different laser scanning speeds. The printlets were administered to 6 human volunteers, and in vivo disintegration times were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In vitro disintegration tests were performed using a standard USP disintegration apparatus, as well as an alternative method based on the use of reduced media volume and minimal agitation. Printlets fabricated at a laser scanning speed of 90 mm/s exhibited an average in vitro disintegration time of 7.2 ± 1 min (measured using the USP apparatus) and 25.5 ± 4.1 min (measured using the alternative method). In contrast, printlets manufactured at a higher laser scanning speed of 130 mm/s had an in vitro disintegration time of 2.8 ± 0.8 min (USP apparatus) and 18.8 ± 1.9 min (alternative method). When tested in humans, printlets fabricated at a laser scanning speed of 90 mm/s showed an average disintegration time of 17.3 ± 7.2 min, while those manufactured at a laser scanning speed of 130 mm/s exhibited a shorter disintegration time of 12.7 ± 6.8 min. Although the disintegration times obtained using the alternative method more closely resembled those obtained in vivo, no clear correlation was observed between the in vitro and in vivo disintegration times, highlighting the need to develop better in vitro methodology for 3D printed drug products., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Alvaro Goyanes reports a relationship with FabRx that includes equity or stocks. Abdul Basit reports a relationship with FabRx that includes equity or stocks., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)