Search

Aims In ∼5–15% of all cases of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have unobstructed coronaries on angiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has proven useful to identify in most patients the underlying diagnosis associated with this presentation. However, the role of CMR to reclassify patients from the initial suspected condition has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with suspected MINOCA, or non-MINOCA, that CMR reclassifies with an alternative diagnosis from the original clinical suspicion. Methods and results A retrospective cohort of patients in a tertiary cardiology centre was identified from a registry database. Patients who were referred for CMR for investigation of suspected MINOCA, and a diagnosis pre- and post-CMR was recorded to determine the proportion of diagnoses reclassified. A total of 888 patients were identified in the registry. CMR reclassified diagnosis in 78% of patients. Diagnosis of MINOCA was confirmed in only 243 patients (27%), whilst most patients had an alternative diagnosis (73%): myocarditis n = 217 (24%), Takotsubo syndrome n = 115 (13%), cardiomyopathies n = 97 (11%), and normal CMR/non-specific n = 216 (24%). Conclusion In a large single-centre cohort of patients presenting with ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries, most patients had a non-MINOCA diagnosis (73%) (myocarditis, Takotsubo, cardiomyopathies, or normal CMR/non-specific findings), whilst only a minority had confirmed MINOCA (27%). Performing CMR led to reclassifying patients' diagnosis in 78% of cases, thus confirming its important clinical role and underscoring the clinical challenge in diagnosing MINOCA and non MINOCA conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human CD16 + monocytes (hCD16 + Ms) have proangiogenic properties. We assessed the feasibility, safety and efficacy of hCD16 + Ms in a porcine model of myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods and Results: A total of 27 female Large White pigs underwent MI with reperfusion and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Five days later, animals received intramyocardial injections of hCD16 + Ms in saline ( n  = 13) or saline only ( n  = 14). hCD16 + Ms were selected from leucocyte cones. Feasibility/safety endpoints included injury at injected sites, malignant arrhythmias, cancer, haematoma, left ventricular (LV) dilatation, troponin release and downstream organ injury. Co-primary efficacy outcome included LV scar and ejection fraction (LVEF) at 30-day post-injections by CMR. Immunohistochemistry included neo-angiogenesis, fibrosis, markers of myofibroblast and inflammation. Four animals were excluded before injections due to untreatable malignant arrhythmias or lung injury. Median cell number and viability were 48.75 million and 87%, respectively. No feasibility/safety concerns were associated with the use of hCD16 + Ms. The LV scar dropped by 14.5gr (from 25.45 ± 8.24 to 10.8 ± 3.4 gr; -55%) and 6.4gr (from 18.83 ± 5.06 to 12.4 ± 3.9gr; -30%) in the hCD16 + Ms and control groups, respectively ( p  = 0.015). The 30-day LVEF did not differ between groups, but a prespecified sub-analysis within the hCD16 + Ms group showed that LVEF was 2.8% higher and LV scar 1.9gr lower in the subgroup receiving a higher cell dose. Higher tissue levels of neo-angiogenesis, myofibroblast and IL-6 and lower levels of TGF-β were observed in the hCD16 + Ms group., Conclusions: The use of hCD16 + Ms in acute MI is feasible, safe and associated with reduced LV scar size, increased tissue levels of neo-angiogenesis, myofibroblasts and IL-6 and reduced pro-fibrotic TGF-β at 30-day post-injections. A higher cell dose might increase the LVEF effect while reducing scar size, but this warrants validation in future studies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Ascione, Bruno, Johnson, Sammut, Bond, Lopez-Baz, Deutsch, Bailey, Chiribiri, Patel, Baker and Modarai.)