Search

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020–2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Lefamulin (Xenleta™), a pleuromutilin antibiotic, was approved for the oral and IV treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults in 2019/2020. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of lefamulin and comparators against 19 584 unique bacterial isolates collected from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections and hospitalized patients with pneumonia within the global SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2015–21. Methods Isolates were susceptibility tested by the CLSI broth microdilution method, and resistance mechanisms were investigated in isolates with elevated lefamulin MICs. Results Lefamulin exhibited potent antibacterial activity against the most common and typical CABP pathogens tested, including Streptococcus pneumoniae [MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 mg/L; 99.9% susceptible (S)], Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L; 99.6% S), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 99.1% S) and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L; 100.0% S). Potent activity was also observed against the less common pneumonia pathogens: β-haemolytic (MIC50/90 of 0.03/0.06 mg/L) and viridans group Streptococcus spp. (MIC50/90 of 0.06/0.25 mg/L) and Haemophilus parainfluenzae (MIC50/90 of 1/4 mg/L). Lefamulin's activity was not adversely affected by resistance to macrolides, penicillin, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones and other resistance phenotypes. Non-susceptibility/resistance to lefamulin was rare and primarily determined by ribosomal protection through vga (A) variants in S. aureus, overexpression of AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in H. influenzae or modifications in L3, L4 and 23SrRNA in Streptococcus spp. Conclusions Based on the coverage of the most important CABP pathogens and lacking cross-resistance, lefamulin may represent a valuable empirical treatment option for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with CABP, particularly in settings with high prevalence of resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study reports the activity of cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter spp. isolates collected from the United States and Europe, including Israel and Turkey, from 2020 to 2021. Among Enterobacterales, 2.8% were carbapenem nonsusceptible (CNSE); cefiderocol inhibited 96.6%/85.1% [Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)/European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints] of these isolates. Imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam displayed susceptibilities lower than cefiderocol against CNSE isolates (67.4-84.6% susceptible, CLSI). Cefiderocol was the only agent active against CNSE isolates carrying metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) carbapenemase or multiple carbapenemase genes (84.6%-92.3% susceptible, CLSI). Approximately 18% of carbapenem-susceptible Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Proteus mirabilis carried extended-spectrum-β-lactamases and/or plasmid-borne AmpC-encoding genes; cefiderocol inhibited 99.8%-100.0% (CLSI) of these genotypic groups. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotypes were observed in 16.9% and 52.5% of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii-calcoaceticus isolates, respectively. Carbapenemase genes were rare (4.9%) among cephalosporin and/or carbapenem nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa , compared to 87.6% carriage in A. baumannii-calcoaceticus , respectively. Against the MDR and carbapenemase-carrying P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii-calcoaceticus subsets, cefiderocol was active against 98.6%/98.7% and 97.1%/97.4% (CLSI), respectively. Only 69 isolates (0.3%) across all species groups were identified as cefiderocol nonsusceptible per CLSI criteria (>4 mg/L). Cefiderocol was the most active agent in vitro against Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp., with uniform activity against all phenotypic- and genotypic-resistant subsets. Coupled with the low incidence of nonsusceptibility observed across species groups, these results demonstrate cefiderocol as an important option for treating infections caused by pathogens with diverse mechanisms of resistance in US and European hospitals.IMPORTANCEThe worldwide spread of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter spp. poses a serious challenge in healthcare settings as infections caused by these organisms are commonly refractory to many frontline therapeutic agents. Multiple global health organizations highlighted these pathogens as critical priorities for new antibiotic development, thus necessitating continued surveillance of the activities of currently available antimicrobial agents and circulating mechanisms of resistance. To meet this need, this study phenotypically and genotypically characterized priority Gram-negative pathogens collected from patients in US and European hospitals to examine the activity of cefiderocol and other currently available treatment options, including carbapenems and β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The results presented here provide a detailed perspective to healthcare practitioners of cefiderocol's broad applicability, manifested in high activity and low nonsusceptibility rates, across phenotypic and genotypic organism groups relative to other agents and further support its use against the most intransigent infections.

The in vitro susceptibility testing interpretive criteria (STIC) for TZP against Enterobacterales were recently updated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST) also recently reviewed TZP STIC for Enterobacterales and arrived at different STIC for Enterobacterales and herein we explain our recommendations and rationale behind them. Based on our review of the available data, USCAST does not recommend TZP STIC for certain Enterobacterales species that have a moderate to high likelihood of clinically significant AmpC production (E. cloacae, C. freundii, and K. aerogenes only) or for third-generation cephalosporin-non-susceptible (3GC-NS) Enterobacterales. USCAST recommends a TZP susceptibility breakpoint of ≤ 16/4 mg/L for third-generation cephalosporin-susceptible (3GC-S) Enterobacterales but only endorses the use of extended infusion TZP regimens for patients with infections due to these pathogens., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)