Search

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although various risk models have been developed for PAH, their comparative prognostic potential requires further exploration. Additionally, the applicability of risk scores in PH groups beyond group 1 remains to be investigated., Research Question: Are risk scores originally developed for PAH predictive in PH groups 1 through 4?, Study Design and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of outcomes among patients with incident PH enrolled in the multicenter worldwide Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep meta-registry. Analyses were performed across PH groups 1 through 4 and further subgroups to evaluate the predictive value of PAH risk scores, including the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Mangement (REVEAL) Lite 2, REVEAL 2.0, European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2022, Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 3-strata, and COMPERA 4-strata., Results: Eight thousand five hundred sixty-five patients were included in the study, of whom 3,537 patients were assigned to group 1 PH, whereas 1,807 patients, 1,635 patients, and 1,586 patients were assigned to group 2 PH, group 3 PH, and group 4 PH, respectively. Pulmonary hemodynamics were impaired with median mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 42 mm Hg (interquartile range, 33-52 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7 Wood units (WU) (interquartile range, 4-11 WU). All risk scores were prognostic in the entire PH population and in each of the PH groups 1 through 4. The REVEAL scores, when used as continuous prediction models, demonstrated the highest statistical prognostic power and granularity; the COMPERA 4-strata risk score provided subdifferentiation of the intermediate-risk group. Similar results were obtained when separately analyzing various subgroups (PH subgroups 1.1, 1.4.1, and 1.4.4; PH subgroups 3.1 and 3.2; group 2 with isolated postcapillary PH vs combined precapillary and postcapillary PH; patients of all groups with concomitant cardiac comorbidities; and severe [> 5 WU] vs nonsevere PH)., Interpretation: This comprehensive study with real-world data from 15 PH centers showed that PAH-designed risk scores possess predictive power in a large PH cohort, whether considered as common to the group or calculated separately for each PH group (1-4) and various subgroups., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05329714; URL: www., Clinicaltrials: gov., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: A. Y. has received personal fees from MSD. H. G. has received personal fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, GossamerBio, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. M. R. W. reports personal fees from MorphogenIX, Janssen, Chiesi, and Aerami; grants from British Heart Foundation and NIHR; and personal fees from MSD, Benevolent AI, and Tiakis Biotech, outside the submitted work. L. H. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Janssen and personal fees from MSD, Gossamer, and Altavant. D. G. K. reports support for the present manuscript from the Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre and consulting fees and other payments from Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Ferrer, Altavant, MSD, and United therapeutics. P. M. H. reports personal fees from Merck Co. S. Y. C. reports personal fees from Janssen, Bayer, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Acceleron Pharma and is a director, officer, and shareholder of Synhale Therapeutics. S. O. reports personal fees from MSD, Janssen, and Gallenica-Ferrer. H. A. G. has received fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. M. J. R. has received support from Janssen Pharmaceutica and Bayer Pharma AG and speaker fees from Janssen Pharmaceutica and OMT. S. S. reports personal fees from Gossamer Bio, Merck, Keros, Janssen, United Therapeutics, and Liquidia. K. T. has received personal fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Gossamer. W. S. has received consultancy fees from United Therapeutics, Tiakis Biotech AG, Liquidia, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Abivax, Pfitzer, and Medspray BV. None declared (M. Fünderich, A.L., Y. S., O. T., A. J. S., R. T. Z., P. G. W., M. Frauendorf, A. Arvanitaki, G. G., K. S., H. R. C., R. F., I. A. G., E. B., J. S. A., A. P., S. G., A. Anthi, R. W. M., J. W., F. G.), (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Limited data are available on Lp(a) testing from the Middle-East region. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the utilization and yield of Lp(a) testing over time and characterize CVD profiles of patients with abnormal Lp(a) tasting at a single-quaternary-care center in the United Arab Emirates., Methods: Unique Lp(a) tests conducted between 07/2017 and 10-2023 were included. Overtime trends in Lp(a) test utilization and abnormal Lp(a) [defined as Lp(a) > 125 nmol/L] test findings were described. CVD rates in patients with abnormal Lp(a) were compared to those with Lp(a) ≤ 125 nmol/L using appropriate methods., Results: In our center, 0.95% of the patients ( n  = 5,677) had their Lp(a) measured, with a median level of 32 [11-82] nmol/L. Lp(a) was abnormal in 15.9% of the tests. Over the years 2018-2022, there was a 109% increase in Lp(a) testing, with concomitant up-trends in findings of abnormal Lp(a) (11.8% to 16.4%, P  = 0.02). Compared to patients with Lp(a) ≤ 125 nmol/I, those with abnormal Lp(a) had higher rates of any prevalent CVD (34% vs. 25.1%, P  < 0.001), CAD (25.6% vs. 17.7%, P  < 0.001), HF (6.5% vs. 3.8%, P  < 0.001), and stroke (7.1% vs. 4.4%, P  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Almost one in six patients tested for Lp(a) had abnormally elevated Lp(a), and CVD was prevalent in one-third of the patients who tested abnormal for Lp(a). The study highlights the growing awareness of the relevance of Lp(a) for CVD risk stratification and prevention., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (© 2024 Manla, AbdelWareth, Shantouf, Aljabery, St John, Sabbour, Piechowski-Jozwiak and Almahmeed.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk modification in patients with optimal weight loss (OWL) versus suboptimal weight loss SWL following MBS., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis. The 10-year risk CVD was estimated before and after one year of surgery using the "Framingham Score"., Results: 191 patients were included in our study. Mean baseline Framingham score was 7.2 ​± ​6.9%. According to the score, 54% of patients were classified as low risk (n ​= ​104), 23% as moderate (n ​= ​43), 20% moderately high (n ​= ​39) and 3% as high risk (n ​= ​5). One year after surgery, 91% of the patients showed reduction of their Framingham score. Mean CVD risk score decreased significantly to 4.1 ​± ​3.7% when compared to baseline (p-value is ​< ​0.001); 80% of patients classified as low risk (n ​= ​153), 13% as moderate (n ​= ​25), 7% moderately high (n ​= ​13) and 0% as high risk (n ​= ​0)., Conclusion: Weight loss after bariatric surgery reduces CVD risk scores and the magnitude of effect correlates with the degree of weight loss., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggest that combination therapy with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is associated with improvement in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels. However, a systematic review of available real-world evidence may facilitate clinical decision-making in the real-world scenario. This meta-analysis assessed the safety and effectiveness of combinations of SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs with a focus on their cardioprotective effects along with glucose-lowering ability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-world setting., Methods: Electronic searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, PROQuest, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases. Qualitative analyses and meta-analyses were performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute SUMARI software package and Review Manager v5.4, respectively., Results: The initial database search yielded 1445 articles; of these, 13 were included in this study. The analyses indicated that SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs combinations were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality when compared with individual therapies (odds ratio [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 [0.41, 0.60]; p < 0.00001). Significant reductions in BMI (- 1.71 [- 2.74, - 0.67]; p = 0.001), SBP (- 6.35 [- 10.17, - 2.53]; p = 0.001), HbA1c levels (- 1.48 [- 1.75, - 1.21]; p < 0.00001), and FPG (- 2.27 [- 2.78, - 1.76]; p < 0.00001) were associated with the simultaneous administration of the combination. Changes in total cholesterol levels and differences between simultaneous and sequential combination therapies for this outcome were not significant., Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis based on real-world data suggests that the combination of SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs is associated with lower all-cause mortality and favorable improvements in cardiovascular, renal, and glycemic measurements. The findings drive a call-to-action to incorporate this combination early and simultaneously in managing T2DM patients and achieve potential cardiovascular benefits and renal protection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Patients with hyperlipidemia treated with statins remain at a residual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids hold the potential to mitigate the residual CV risk in statin-treated patients, with persistently elevated triglyceride (TG) levels., Method: We reviewed the current evidence on the use of icosapent ethyl (IPE), an omega-3 fatty acid yielding a pure form of eicosapentaenoic acid., Results: REDUCE-IT reported a significant 25% reduction in CV events, including the need for coronary revascularization, the risk of fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and CV death in patients on IPE, unseen with other omega-3 fatty acids treatments. IPE was effective in all patients regardless of baseline CV risk enhancers (TG levels, type-2 diabetes status, weight status, prior revascularization, or renal function). Adverse events (atrial fibrillation/flutter) related to IPE have occurred mostly in patients with prior atrial fibrillation. Yet, the net clinical benefit largely exceeded potential risks. The combination with other omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, in particular DHA, eliminated the effect of EPA alone, as reported in the STRENGTH and OMEMI trials. Adding IPE to statin treatment seems to be cost-effective, especially in the context of secondary prevention of CVD, decreasing CV event frequency and subsequently the use of healthcare resources., Conclusion: Importantly, IPE has been endorsed by 20 international medical societies as a statin add-on treatment in patients with dyslipidemia and high CV risk. Robust medical evidence supports IPE as a pillar in the management of dyslipidemia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)