Search

Background Methods Results Conclusions Skin cancer incidence increases globally, requiring effective preventive measures and evidence‐based treatment strategies. Current guidelines advocate for surgical excision as a first‐line treatment for most early skin cancers. The study investigated practices regarding changing scalpel blades when excising multiple skin lesions in the same patient during the same visit (CSB) and explored how beliefs about iatrogenic seeding influence individual norms of practice.A multidisciplinary survey was conducted among 173 medical specialists involved in skin cancer care. Participants provided demographic information, years of experience, and practices regarding CSB in four clinical scenarios (first excised tumor: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma suspect, and evident melanoma). Practice variations based on specialty, experience, and beliefs about seeding risk were statistically assessed.Surgeons exhibited a significantly higher tendency to change blades compared to non‐surgeons across all diagnoses. Iatrogenic seeding (56.52%) and clinical training (18.84%) were the main reasons provided for CSB. Beliefs about seeding risk did not differ significantly between specialties.Although the practice of CSB lacks strong scientific rationale, the approach to this practice significantly varies among different medical specialties. Healthcare professionals should critically evaluate and standardize evidence‐based practices to ensure optimal patient care and mitigate potential harm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) arising within scar tissue is a rare but clinically significant phenomenon. This comprehensive review aims to provide a succinct overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the etiological factors, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of BCC. This study constitutes a literature review pertaining to BCC, with a particular emphasis on BCC developing within scar tissue. It also provides a clinical case presentation of a patient who had developed BCC in a BCG post-vaccination scar and a review of analogous findings available in the existing literature. Despite the fact that an array of mechanisms play a role in injury-related BCC growth, the main mechanism remains ambiguous and yet to be elucidated. The review also includes a detailed description of the various therapeutic options available for BCC, ranging from surgical interventions to novel pharmacological treatments. By examining these intersections, the review seeks to elucidate the potential mechanisms, identify risk factors, and suggest considerations for clinical practice. The findings underscore the importance of vigilant dermatological assessment in patients with scar tissue and those recently vaccinated, aiming to improve early detection and optimize management strategies for BCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acne is a common skin condition affecting both adolescents and adults, and it can profoundly impact patients' quality of life and mental well-being. This prospective cross-sectional study aims to explore the differences in psychosocial aspects between male and female acne patients in Poland. A total of 104 consecutive acne patients were included in this study. Clinical severity, patients' quality of life, stigmatization levels, and psychiatric disturbances were evaluated using the following instruments: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI), 6-Item Stigmatization Scale (6-ISS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This study found that female patients exhibited significantly less severe acne and experienced significantly decreased quality of life and increased levels of stigmatization. Furthermore, anxiety levels among female patients exceeded those observed in their male counterparts. Notably, no disparities in the severity of depression were observed between the two gender groups. Correlations were discerned among all psychosocial parameters in the entire study cohort and in the female subgroup, while such correlations were not uniformly observed among male participants. This study underscores the importance of considering psychosocial aspects and implementing routine measurements in the management of acne to improve patients' well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]