Search

Despite efforts to ban asbestos mining and manufacturing, mesothelioma deaths in the United States have remained stable at approximately 2500 cases annually. This trend is not unique to the United States but is also a global phenomenon, associated with increased aging of populations worldwide. Although geoeconomic factors such as lack of regulations and continued asbestos manufacturing in resource-poor countries play a role, it is essential to consider biological factors such as immune senescence and increased genetic instability associated with aging. Recognizing that mesothelioma shares genetic instability and immune system effects with other age-related cancers is crucial because the impact of aging on mesothelioma is frequently assessed in the context of disease latency after asbestos exposure. Nevertheless, the long latency period, often cited as a reason for mesothelioma's elderly predominance, should not overshadow the shared mechanisms. This communication focuses on the role of immune surveillance in mesothelioma, particularly exploring the impact of immune escape resulting from altered TSG function during aging, contributing to the phylogenetic development of gene mutations and mesothelioma oncogenesis. The interplay between the immune system, TSGs, and aging not only shapes the immune landscape in mesothelioma but also contributes to the development of heterogeneous tumor microenvironments, significantly influencing responses to immunotherapy approaches and survival rates. By understanding the complex interplay between aging, TSG decline, and immune senescence, health care professionals can pave the way for more effective and personalized immunotherapies, ultimately offering hope for better outcomes in the fight against mesothelioma., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Asbestosis, defined as diffuse pulmonary fibrosis caused by inhalation of asbestos fibers, occurs after heavy exposures to asbestos dust over several decades. Because workplace exposures have been significantly curtailed since the banning of asbestos in insulation products, we were interested in examining the clinicopathological characteristics of cases diagnosed in the 21 st century. The consultation files of one of the authors (VLR) were reviewed for cases of asbestosis diagnosed since 1/1/2001. 102 cases were identified, with a median age of 75 years (range: 45-89). There were 100 men and 2 women. The women were from Turkey and Brazil (none from the United States). Malignancies were present in 78 cases, including 38 lung cancers, 29 pleural mesotheliomas, and 8 peritoneal mesotheliomas. The grade of asbestosis was available in 88 cases (median severity of 2; scale: 1-4). Pleural plaque was present in 94% of cases. The most common exposure categories were insulators (39), shipyard workers (16), asbestos manufacturing (9), boiler workers (8) and pipefitter/welders (6). The median duration of exposure was 33 years (range: 2-49 years). Lung fiber burden analysis was performed in 34 cases, with amosite being the predominant fiber type. Results were compared with similar information for 475 cases diagnosed prior to 1/1/2001.

Background: The diagnosis of mesothelioma may be challenging. We investigated a large database of cases in order to determine the frequency with which a diagnosis of mesothelioma was made incorrectly and the most frequent causes of error., Design: A database including more than 4000 consultation cases of histologically confirmed mesothelioma was examined to identify cases in which mesothelioma was diagnosed by at least one pathologist when the available information pointed towards a different diagnosis., Results: There were 311 cases misdiagnosed as mesothelioma. The most common category was metastatic carcinoma to the pleura or peritoneum (129 cases: 73 lung carcinomas, 15 renal cell carcinomas). The next most common category was primary lung cancer (111 cases: 55 sarcomatoid carcinoma, 56 pseudomesotheliomatous carcinoma). The third most common category was primary malignancies arising from or near the serosal membranes (33 cases). The fourth most common category was fibrous pleurisy (38 cases). The most common errors were failure to consider important radiographic information regarding the gross distribution of tumor, lack of awareness or consideration of another malignancy, overreliance on certain immunohistochemical results, and failure to perform certain diagnostic histochemical, immunohistochemical, or ultrastructural studies., Conclusions: There are a number of diagnostic pitfalls that can lead to the over diagnosis of mesothelioma. Careful attention to clinical and radiographic information as well as performance of appropriate ancillary tests can help to prevent such misdiagnoses. Detailed examples will be presented to assist in the avoidance of these pitfalls with emphasis on the most commonly observed errors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Roggli has consulted with plaintiff and defense attorneys in asbestos litigation cases. Dr. Pavlisko and Dr. Carney have consulted with defense attorneys in asbestos litigation cases. Drs. Glass and Pina-Oviedo have no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)