Search

Abstract Introduction The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Arabic translation of the Mukbang Addiction Scale (MAS) among Arabic-speaking adults from the general population. Specifically, it aimed to assess the factorial structure through a confirmatory factor analysis, determine the composite reliability through Cronbach alpha and McDonald’s omega scores, assess gender invariance, and evaluate the convergent validity by examining its correlation to eating addiction and psychological distress. Methods A total of 370 individuals with a mean age of 21.94 ± 2.29 years participated in this study, which was conducted using an online platform. The participants were surveyed on demographic information, mukbang addiction, food addiction, and psychological distress. Translation was conducted using the forward and backward technique. Results The findings demonstrated excellent internal consistency of the Arabic MAS (McDonald’s omega coefficient = 0.93). Confirmatory factor analyses validated the one-factor structure of the scale, while establishing measurement invariance across sex at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. No sex differences were observed in the Mukbang addiction levels. Lastly, the MAS scores were significantly and positively correlated with food addiction and psychological distress, supporting their convergent validity. Conclusion The current research provides evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the MAS as a self-report method for assessing addictive Mukbang watching. While further validations are needed to corroborate the present findings, this measure can be effectively utilized across different fields, including schools, mental health centers, and researchers aiming to understand this global phenomenon. Plain English Summary Mukbang refers to individuals or hosts consuming large quantities of food while interacting with their audiences through recorded video or a live stream. The Mukbang phenomenon has gained substantial popularity among young individuals over the past years, rising concerns about its potential impact on their eating habits and health, especially when overconsumed. Overconsumption of mukbang content, or Mukbang addiction, aligns with the core features of addiction, including compulsive engagement, tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms, making it comparable to other addictive behaviors. Mukbang addiction can lead to detrimental effects on mental and physical health, including neglect of balanced nutrition, disordered eating habits, obesity, feelings of guilt, shame, poor self-esteem, distorted self-images, body dissatisfaction, heightened anxiety or depression, and social isolation. Given these significant impacts, valid and reliable tools are crucial to enable an accurate assessment of Mukbang addiction. This study proposes to translate, adapt and examine the psychometric properties of the Mukbang Addiction Scale (MAS) in a sample of Arabic-speaking individuals from the general population. Findings showed that the six MAS items loaded on a single factor with strong internal consistency and good convergent validity, preliminarily indicating its potential validity and reliability for assessing addictive mukbang-watching among Arabic-speaking individuals.

Abstract Background Depression, anxiety, and stress are the commonly encountered mental health conditions among medical students. Overseas environment may add additional burden to the existing environment. However, comparison of the rate and associated factors of depression, anxiety, stress among domestic and overseas students has not been attempted in Bangladesh. We aimed to assess the rate and associated factors of depression, anxiety, stress among domestic and overseas medical students in the country. Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted among 360 undergraduate medical students in 2021. Data were collected by self‐reporting instruments by a stratified random sampling method by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale‐21 scale. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were done by computing crude odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval to identify the associated factors. Results Among the 360 undergraduate medical students, 181 were domestic and 179 overseas ones. 44.8% of domestic students reported depressive symptoms, 45.3% reported anxiety symptoms, and 33.1% reported stress. On the other hand, half of overseas students experienced depression (50.3%) and anxiety (52.5%), and 41.3% experienced stress. Female medical students were found vulnerable for developing depression, anxiety, and stress than males. Conclusions The study revealed higher rates of depression, anxiety, and stress among overseas undergraduate medical students enrolled in a private medical school of Bangladesh. Private medical college authorities could consider special services for overseas students to ensure adequate psychosocial support.

The stigma among caregivers is significantly creating stress for them, which is ultimately disturbing their well-being and quality of life. The aim of the current study is to translate and validate the Family Stigma Stress Scale (FSSS) in Urdu among caregivers of patients with mental illness in Pakistan. A purposive sample of 421 caregivers above 18 years of age (M=39.43, SD=12.41) participated in the present research, where 42.3% were men and 57.7% were women. All the participants completed FSSS and self-structured demographic sheet. For translating the scale, WHO guidelines were followed. Data were analysed through SPSS version 26 and AMOS version 24. To test the internal consistency of the translated scale, we apply the alpha reliability test. The result indicated that the internal consistency of the overall FSSS is good (α=0.85), while its subscale perceived harm (α=0.90) and perceived coping resources (α=0.87) also showed excellent internal consistency. To check that the translated version confirmed the same items, we applied confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through AMOS version 24. The results of CFA showed that the model is in the acceptable to good fit range with χ2/df (3.16), CFI (0.98), TLI (0.97), IFI (0.98), NFI (0.97), and RMSEA (0.07). An independent sample t-test was used to check the gender difference and illness differences related to caregiving on subscales of FSSS. Results of t-test showed that significant gender differences were observed only on perceived harm indicating that women caregivers perceived more harm as compared to men caregivers of patients with mental illness. Moreover, we also found that caregivers of patients with psychotic disorders perceived more coping resources than caregivers of patients with neurotic disorders. By integrating the FSSS into routine assessments and screenings in healthcare settings, professionals can identify caregivers experiencing high levels of stigma-related stress accurately. Healthcare professionals can advocate for policies and social programs that reduce stigma surrounding mental illness and provide resources for caregivers. Apart from these implications, there are some limitations in the present research, and this scale may not fully account for cultural sensitivity which potentially impacts the scale’s applicability and generalizability. Participants may provide socially desirable responses, especially when dealing with sensitive topics like family stigma. This response bias can affect the accuracy and validity of the scale. Future researchers should focus on these limitations and try to fill these gaps.